Catch-up cycles and changes in industrial leadership:Windows of opportunity and responses of firms and countries in the evolution of sectoral systems ☆

This study proposes a framework that aims to explain why successive changes in industry leadership (called also the catch-up cycle) occur over time in a sector. In catch-up cycles, latecomer firms and countries emerge as international leaders, whereas incumbents lose their previous positions. New leaders are then dethroned by newcomers. To identify factors at the base of catch-up cycles, this article adopts a sectoral system framework and identifies windows of opportunity that may emerge during the long-run evolution of an industry. This study proposes three windows related to the specific dimensions of a sectoral system. One dimension is related to changes in knowledge and technology. The second dimension pertains to changes in demand, and the third includes changes in institutions and public policy. The combination of the opening of a window (technological, demand, or institutional/policy) and the responses of firms and other components of the sectoral system of the latecomer and incumbent countries determines changes in industrial leadership and catch-up. Sectors differ according to the type of windows that may open and the responses of firms and other components of systems. Empirical evidence of catch-up cycles is presented from six sectors, namely mobile phones, cameras, semiconductors, steel, mid-sized jets, and wines.

[1]  S. Mani.  Keeping pace with globalisation innovation capability in Korea's telecommunications equipment industry , 2007 .

[2]  S. Lall.  Competitiveness Indices and Developing Countries: An Economic Evaluation of the Global Competitiveness Report , 2001 .

[3]  Keun Lee,et al.  Rise of latecomers and catch-up cycles in the world steel industry , 2016 .

[4]  A. Morrison,et al.  AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF WINE ECONOMISTS AAWE WORKING PAPER No . 148 Business GRADUAL CATCH UP AND ENDURING LEADERSHIP IN THE GLOBAL WINE INDUSTRY , 2014 .

[5]  S. Ramani,et al.  Explaining divergence in catching-up in pharma between India and Brazil using the NSI framework , 2012 .

[6]  R. Vernon.  International investment and international trade in the product cycle , 1966 .

[7]  R. Nelson.  National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis , 1993 .

[8]  Keun Lee,et al.  Catching‐Up or Leapfrogging in the Indian IT Service Sector: Windows of Opportunity, Path‐Creating, and Moving Up the Value Chain , 2014 .

[9]  Keun Lee,et al.  The capability of the Samsung group in project execution and vertical integration: Created in Korea, replicated in China , 2009 .

[10]  R. Chandy,et al.  The Incumbent's Curse? Incumbency, Size, and Radical Product Innovation , 2000 .

[11]  Ron Adner,et al.  A demand‐based perspective on sustainable competitive advantage , 2006 .

[12]  Linsu Kim,et al.  Imitation to Innovation: The Dynamics of Korea's Technological Learning , 1997 .

[13]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  Corporate effects and dynamic managerial capabilities , 2003 .

[14]  International competitiveness , 2018, OECD Compendium of Productivity Indicators.

[15]  Kathryn Graziano.  The innovator's dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail , 1998 .

[16]  F. Malerba.  Sectoral systems of innovation and production , 2002 .

[17]  Bart Verspagen,et al.  The Role of Innovation in Development , 2010 .

[18]  Martti Häikiö.  Nokia: The Inside Story , 2002 .

[19]  John A. Mathews,et al.  Competitive Advantages of the Latecomer Firm: A Resource-Based Account of Industrial Catch-Up Strategies , 2002 .

[20]  R. Chandy,et al.  Organizing for Radical Product Innovation: The Overlooked Role of Willingness to Cannibalize , 1998 .

[21]  Keun Lee,et al.  Sectoral Innovation System and a Technological Catch-up: The Case of the Capital Goods Industry in Korea , 2008 .

[22]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of , 1990 .

[23]  M. Bell,et al.  Technological Accumulation and Industrial Growth: Contrasts Between Developed and Developing Countries , 1993 .

[24]  Jaeyong Song,et al.  Innovation and Recurring Shifts in Industrial Leadership: Three Phases of Change and Persistence in the Camera Industry , 2017 .

[25]  Claudio Giachetti,et al.  Evolution of firms' product strategy over the life cycle of technology-based industries: A case study of the global mobile phone industry, 1980–2009 , 2010 .

[26]  D. Vértesy.  Preconditions, windows of opportunity and innovation strategies: Successive leadership changes in the regional jet industry , 2017 .

[27]  Franco Malerba,et al.  Learning and catching up in different sectoral systems: evidence from six industries , 2011 .

[28]  Franco Malerba,et al.  Sectoral systems of innovation , 2014 .

[29]  Franco Malerba,et al.  Sectoral systems of innovation and production in developing countries : actors, structure and evolution , 2009 .

[30]  Keun Lee,et al.  Knowledge diffusion, market segmentation and technological catch-up: The case of the telecommunication industry in China , 2005 .

[31]  Franco Malerba,et al.  A history-friendly model of the successive changes in industrial leadership and the catch-up by latecomers , 2017 .

[32]  Keun Lee,et al.  Emerging digital technology as a window of opportunity and technological leapfrogging: catch-up in digital TV by the Korean firms , 2005, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[33]  B. Lundvall,et al.  China's System and Vision of Innovation: An Analysis in Relation to the Strategic Adjustment and the Medium- to Long-Term S&T Development Plan (2006–20) , 2009 .

[34]  Claudio Giachetti.  Competitive Dynamics in the Mobile Phone Industry , 2013 .

[35]  Keun Lee,et al.  Schumpeterian Analysis of Economic Catch-up , 2013 .

[36]  F. Malerba.  Sectoral Systems of Innovation: Concepts, Issues and Analyses of Six Major Sectors in Europe , 2009 .

[37]  C. Freeman.  Technology policy and economic performance : lessons from Japan , 1987 .

[38]  Keun Lee,et al.  Technological Regimes, Catching-Up and Leapfrogging: Findings from the Korean Industries , 2001 .

[39]  Richard R. Nelson,et al.  The Co-evolution of Technology, Industrial Structure, and Supporting Institutions , 1994 .

[40]  M. Tushman,et al.  Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments , 1986 .

[41]  J. Mathews,et al.  South Korea and Taiwan , 2012 .

[42]  R. V. Wyk.  Innovation: The attacker's advantage : Richard N. Foster 316 pages, £14.95 (London, Macmillan, 1986) , 1987 .

[43]  Luc Soete,et al.  Catching up in technology: entry barriers and windows of opportunity , 1988 .

[44]  David C. Mowery,et al.  Sources of Industrial Leadership , 1999 .

[45]  Hiroshi Ohashi,et al.  Effects of Technology Adoption on Productivity and Industry Growth: A Study of Steel Refining Furnaces , 2008 .

[46]  Bengt-Åke Lundvall,et al.  National Systems of Innovation: towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning London: Pint , 1995 .

[47]  Claudio Giachetti,et al.  Successive changes in leadership in the worldwide mobile phone industry: The role of windows of opportunity and firms’ competitive action , 2017 .

[48]  F. Malerba,et al.  Related yet diverging sectoral systems: telecommunications equipment and semiconductors in China , 2017 .

[49]  Jang-Sup Shin.  Dynamic Catch-Up Srategy, Capability Expansion and Changing Windows of Opportunity in the Memory Industry , 2015 .

[50]  J. Mathews.  Strategy and the Crystal Cycle , 2005 .

[51]  S. Winter,et al.  An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change.by Richard R. Nelson; Sidney G. Winter , 1987 .

[52]  J. Fagerberg,et al.  The Competitiveness of Nations: Why Some Countries Prosper While Others Fall Behind , 2007 .