Transfusion strategies for acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

BACKGROUND The hemoglobin threshold for transfusion of red cells in patients with acute gastrointestinal bleeding is controversial. We compared the efficacy and safety of a restrictive transfusion strategy with those of a liberal transfusion strategy. METHODS We enrolled 921 patients with severe acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding and randomly assigned 461 of them to a restrictive strategy (transfusion when the hemoglobin level fell below 7 g per deciliter) and 460 to a liberal strategy (transfusion when the hemoglobin fell below 9 g per deciliter). Randomization was stratified according to the presence or absence of liver cirrhosis. RESULTS A total of 225 patients assigned to the restrictive strategy (51%), as compared with 61 assigned to the liberal strategy (14%), did not receive transfusions (P<0.001) [corrected].The probability of survival at 6 weeks was higher in the restrictive-strategy group than in the liberal-strategy group (95% vs. 91%; hazard ratio for death with restrictive strategy, 0.55; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.33 to 0.92; P=0.02). Further bleeding occurred in 10% of the patients in the restrictive-strategy group as compared with 16% of the patients in the liberal-strategy group (P=0.01), and adverse events occurred in 40% as compared with 48% (P=0.02). The probability of survival was slightly higher with the restrictive strategy than with the liberal strategy in the subgroup of patients who had bleeding associated with a peptic ulcer (hazard ratio, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.26 to 1.25) and was significantly higher in the subgroup of patients with cirrhosis and Child-Pugh class A or B disease (hazard ratio, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.11 to 0.85), but not in those with cirrhosis and Child-Pugh class C disease (hazard ratio, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.45 to 2.37). Within the first 5 days, the portal-pressure gradient increased significantly in patients assigned to the liberal strategy (P=0.03) but not in those assigned to the restrictive strategy. CONCLUSIONS As compared with a liberal transfusion strategy, a restrictive strategy significantly improved outcomes in patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding. (Funded by Fundació Investigació Sant Pau; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00414713.).

[1]  M. Gladwin,et al.  Nitric oxide, hemolysis, and the red blood cell storage lesion: interactions between transfusion, donor, and recipient , 2012, Transfusion.

[2]  B. Chaitman,et al.  Liberal or restrictive transfusion in high-risk patients after hip surgery. , 2011, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  J. West,et al.  Reductions in 28-Day Mortality Following Hospital Admission for Upper Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage , 2011, Gastroenterology.

[4]  S. Travis,et al.  Outcomes following early red blood cell transfusion in acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding , 2010, Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics.

[5]  M. Halland,et al.  Characteristics and Outcomes of Upper Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage in a Tertiary Referral Hospital , 2010, Digestive Diseases and Sciences.

[6]  R. Hunt,et al.  International Consensus Recommendations on the Management of Patients With Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding , 2010, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[7]  P. Marik,et al.  Efficacy of red blood cell transfusion in the critically ill: A systematic review of the literature* , 2008, Critical care medicine.

[8]  A. Barkun,et al.  Management of acute bleeding from a peptic ulcer. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  T. Mihaljevic,et al.  Duration of red-cell storage and complications after cardiac surgery. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  E. Vamvakas,et al.  Transfusion-related immunomodulation (TRIM): an update. , 2007, Blood reviews.

[11]  J. Collet,et al.  Transfusion strategies for patients in pediatric intensive care units. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  R. Franchis,et al.  Revising consensus in portal hypertension: report of the Baveno V consensus workshop on methodology of diagnosis and therapy in portal hypertension. , 2005, Journal of hepatology.

[13]  A. Meyer,et al.  Blood transfusion is an independent predictor of increased mortality in nonoperatively managed blunt hepatic and splenic injuries. , 2005, The Journal of trauma.

[14]  A. Barkun,et al.  Consensus Recommendations for Managing Patients with Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding , 2003, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[15]  Thomas M Scalea,et al.  Blood transfusion, independent of shock severity, is associated with worse outcome in trauma. , 2003, The Journal of trauma.

[16]  K. Palmer.  Non-variceal upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage: guidelines , 2002, Gut.

[17]  J. Duggan.  Review article: transfusion in gastrointestinal haemorrhage—if, when and how much? , 2001, Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics.

[18]  J. Boadas,et al.  Somatostatin treatment and risk stratification by continuous portal pressure monitoring during acute variceal bleeding. , 2001, Gastroenterology.

[19]  P. Pizcueta,et al.  Effects of blood volume restitution following a portal hypertensive–related bleeding in anesthetized cirrhotic rats , 2001, Hepatology.

[20]  I. Kwan,et al.  Is the normalisation of blood pressure in bleeding trauma patients harmful? , 2001, The Lancet.

[21]  G. Wells,et al.  A multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial of transfusion requirements in critical care. Transfusion Requirements in Critical Care Investigators, Canadian Critical Care Trials Group. , 1999, The New England journal of medicine.

[22]  N. Mcintyre,et al.  Why portal hypertensive varices bleed and bleed: a hypothesis. , 1995, Gut.

[23]  R. Greenhalgh,et al.  Effect of early blood transfusion on gastrointestinal haemorrhage , 1986, The British journal of surgery.

[24]  R. Groszmann,et al.  Splanchnic and systemic hemodynamics in portal hypertensive rats during hemorrhage and blood volume restitution. , 1986, Gastroenterology.

[25]  S. Travis,et al.  Red cell transfusion for the management of upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage. , 2009, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[26]  R. de Franchis.  Updating consensus in portal hypertension: report of the Baveno III Consensus Workshop on definitions, methodology and therapeutic strategies in portal hypertension. , 2000, Journal of hepatology.

[27]  C. Apezteguía,et al.  [Acute anemia in high digestive hemorrhage. Margins of security for their handling without transfusion of red globules]. , 1999, Acta gastroenterologica Latinoamericana.