Inactivation of Pol θ and C-NHEJ eliminates off-target integration of exogenous DNA

Off-target or random integration of exogenous DNA hampers precise genomic engineering and presents a safety risk in clinical gene therapy strategies. Genetic definition of random integration has been lacking for decades. Here, we show that the A-family DNA polymerase θ (Pol θ) promotes random integration, while canonical non-homologous DNA end joining plays a secondary role; cells double deficient for polymerase θ and canonical non-homologous DNA end joining are devoid of any integration events, demonstrating that these two mechanisms define random integration. In contrast, homologous recombination is not reduced in these cells and gene targeting is improved to 100% efficiency. Such complete reversal of integration outcome, from predominately random integration to exclusively gene targeting, provides a rational way forward to improve the efficacy and safety of DNA delivery and gene correction approaches.Random off-target integration events can impair precise gene targeting and poses a safety risk for gene therapy. Here the authors show that repression of polymerase θ and classical non-homologous recombination eliminates random integration.

[1]  M. Stoker.  Effect of X-Irradiation on Susceptibility of Cells to Transformation by Polyoma Virus , 1963, Nature.

[2]  N. Maitland,et al.  Biochemical transformation of mouse cells by fragments of herpes simplex virus DNA , 1977, Cell.

[3]  S. Bacchetti,et al.  Transfer of the gene for thymidine kinase to thymidine kinase-deficient human cells by purified herpes simplex viral DNA. , 1977, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  K. Yamanishi,et al.  Biochemical transformation of mouse cells by varicella-zoster virus. , 1981, The Journal of general virology.

[5]  M. Botchan,et al.  DNA-mediated gene transfer efficiency is enhanced by ionizing and ultraviolet irradiation of rodent cells in vitro. I. Kinetics of enhancement. , 1985, Radiation research.

[6]  M. Botchan,et al.  Association of crossover points with topoisomerase I cleavage sites: a model for nonhomologous recombination. , 1985, Science.

[7]  M. Monk,et al.  HPRT-deficient (Lesch–Nyhan) mouse embryos derived from germline colonization by cultured cells , 1987, Nature.

[8]  T. Petes,et al.  Integration of DNA fragments by illegitimate recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  M. Jasin,et al.  Ku80-deficient Cells Exhibit Excess Degradation of Extrachromosomal DNA* , 1996, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[10]  C. Stevens,et al.  Ionizing radiation greatly improves gene transfer efficiency in mammalian cells. , 1996, Human gene therapy.

[11]  G. Thomas,et al.  Chromosome translocation based on illegitimate recombination in human tumors. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  A. Porter,et al.  Therapeutic gene targeting , 1998, Gene Therapy.

[13]  K. Vasquez,et al.  Manipulating the mammalian genome by homologous recombination , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  N. Ellis,et al.  Ku DNA end-binding protein modulates homologous repair of double-strand breaks in mammalian cells. , 2001, Genes & development.

[15]  M. Jasin,et al.  BRCA2 is required for homology-directed repair of chromosomal breaks. , 2001, Molecular cell.

[16]  H. Würtele,et al.  Illegitimate DNA integration in mammalian cells , 2003, Gene Therapy.

[17]  S. West,et al.  Eme1 is involved in DNA damage processing and maintenance of genomic stability in mammalian cells , 2003, The EMBO journal.

[18]  M. Gellert,et al.  Mechanism of illegitimate recombination: Common sites for recombination and cleavage mediated by E. coli DNA gyrase , 2004, Molecular and General Genetics MGG.

[19]  G. Testa,et al.  BAC engineering for the generation of ES cell-targeting constructs and mouse transgenes. , 2004, Methods in molecular biology.

[20]  R. Lussier,et al.  Characterization of in vivo recombination activities in the mouse embryo , 2005, Molecular Genetics and Genomics.

[21]  J. Rogers,et al.  A genome-wide, end-sequenced 129Sv BAC library resource for targeting vector construction. , 2005, Genomics.

[22]  J. Mcwhir,et al.  Down‐regulation of PARP‐1, but not of Ku80 or DNA‐PKcs, results in higher gene targeting efficiency , 2006, Cell biology international.

[23]  A. Bradley,et al.  Generation of an inducible and optimized piggyBac transposon system , 2007, Nucleic acids research.

[24]  S. Kosak,et al.  Integration site analysis in transgenic mice by thermal asymmetric interlaced (TAIL)-PCR: segregating multiple-integrant founder lines and determining zygosity , 2008, Transgenic Research.

[25]  H. Koyama,et al.  Impact of non-homologous end-joining deficiency on random and targeted DNA integration: implications for gene targeting , 2008, Nucleic acids research.

[26]  D. G. Gibson,et al.  Enzymatic assembly of DNA molecules up to several hundred kilobases , 2009, Nature Methods.

[27]  D. Roth,et al.  Roles for NBS1 in alternative nonhomologous end-joining of V(D)J recombination intermediates. , 2009, Molecular cell.

[28]  J. Dahm-Daphi,et al.  The alternative end-joining pathway for repair of DNA double-strand breaks requires PARP1 but is not dependent upon microhomologies , 2010, Nucleic acids research.

[29]  M. McVey,et al.  Dual Roles for DNA Polymerase Theta in Alternative End-Joining Repair of Double-Strand Breaks in Drosophila , 2010, PLoS genetics.

[30]  B. Van Houten,et al.  Crucial roles for DNA ligase III in mitochondria but not in XRCC1-dependent repair , 2011, Nature.

[31]  Quentin Geissmann,et al.  OpenCFU, a New Free and Open-Source Software to Count Cell Colonies and Other Circular Objects , 2012, PloS one.

[32]  David A. Scott,et al.  Genome engineering using the CRISPR-Cas9 system , 2013, Nature Protocols.

[33]  R. Kanaar,et al.  Caffeine suppresses homologous recombination through interference with RAD51-mediated joint molecule formation , 2013, Nucleic acids research.

[34]  Wouter Koole,et al.  A Polymerase Theta-dependent repair pathway suppresses extensive genomic instability at endogenous G4 DNA sites , 2014, Nature Communications.

[35]  M. Lieber,et al.  Non-homologous end joining often uses microhomology: implications for alternative end joining. , 2014, DNA repair.

[36]  Stephen J. Elledge,et al.  Homologous recombination-deficient tumors are hyper-dependent on POLQ-mediated repair , 2015, Nature.

[37]  Kyle M. Miller,et al.  Mammalian polymerase θ promotes alternative NHEJ and suppresses recombination , 2015, Nature.

[38]  A. Datta,et al.  Genetically modified (GM) crops: milestones and new advances in crop improvement , 2016, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[39]  J. Duan,et al.  Ligase I and ligase III mediate the DNA double-strand break ligation in alternative end-joining , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[40]  S. Sarkar,et al.  A role for human homologous recombination factors in suppressing microhomology-mediated end joining , 2016, Nucleic acids research.

[41]  M. Tijsterman,et al.  T-DNA integration in plants results from polymerase-θ-mediated DNA repair , 2016, Nature Plants.

[42]  N. Adachi,et al.  Advances in the Development of Gene-Targeting Vectors to Increase the Efficiency of Genetic Modification. , 2016, Biological & pharmaceutical bulletin.

[43]  D. Trouche,et al.  Control of alternative end joining by the chromatin remodeler p400 ATPase , 2015, Nucleic acids research.

[44]  Sailan Shui,et al.  Delivery methods for site-specific nucleases: Achieving the full potential of therapeutic gene editing. , 2016, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[45]  Kefei Yu,et al.  Redundant function of DNA ligase 1 and 3 in alternative end-joining during immunoglobulin class switch recombination , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[46]  Ryo Maeda,et al.  Dual loss of human POLQ and LIG4 abolishes random integration , 2017, Nature Communications.