Application of toxicogenomics to genetic toxicology risk assessment

Based on the assumption that compounds having similar toxic modes of action induce specific gene expression changes, the toxicity of unknown compounds can be predicted after comparison of their molecular fingerprints with those obtained with compounds of known toxicity. These predictive models will therefore rely on the characterization of marker genes. Toxicogenomics (TGX) also provides mechanistic insight into the mode of toxicity, and can therefore be used as an adjunct to the standard battery of genotoxicity tests. Promising results, highlighting the ability of TGX to differentiate genotoxic from non‐genotoxic carcinogens, as well as DNA‐reactive from non‐DNA reactive genotoxins, have been reported. Additional data suggested the possibility of ranking genotoxins according to the nature of their interactions with DNA. This new approach could contribute to the improvement of risk assessment. TGX could be applied as a follow‐up testing strategy in case of positive in vitro genotoxicity findings, and could contribute to improve our ability to identify the molecular mechanism of action and to possibly better assess dose–response curves. TGX has been found to be less sensitive than the standard genotoxicity end‐points, probably because it measures the whole cell population response, when compared with standard tests designed to detect rare events in a small number of cells. Further validation will be needed (1) to better link the profiles obtained with TGX to the established genotoxicity end‐points, (2) to improve the gene annotation tools, and (3) to standardise study design and data analysis and to better evaluate the impact of variability between platforms and bioinformatics approaches. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 48:369‐379, 2007. © 2007 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  Angela J Harris,et al.  Comparison of basal gene expression profiles and effects of hepatocarcinogens on gene expression in cultured primary human hepatocytes and HepG2 cells. , 2004, Mutation research.

[2]  R. Lempicki,et al.  Evaluation of gene expression measurements from commercial microarray platforms. , 2003, Nucleic acids research.

[3]  Eliot Marshall,et al.  Getting the Noise Out of Gene Arrays , 2004, Science.

[4]  G. Warnes,et al.  Differentiation of DNA reactive and non-reactive genotoxic mechanisms using gene expression profile analysis. , 2004, Mutation research.

[5]  Seokjoo Yoon,et al.  Identification of potential biomarkers of genotoxicity and carcinogenicity in L5178Y mouse lymphoma cells by cDNA microarray analysis , 2005, Environmental and molecular mutagenesis.

[6]  E Zeiger,et al.  Strategy for genotoxicity testing: hazard identification and risk assessment in relation to in vitro testing. , 2007, Mutation research.

[7]  David Jacobson-Kram,et al.  Use of Genotoxicity Data to Support Clinical Trials or Positive Genetox Findings on a Candidate Pharmaceutical or Impurity …. Now What? , 2005, International journal of toxicology.

[8]  J. Barrett,et al.  Identification and chromosomal assignment of two heterozygous mutations in the Trp53 gene in L5178Y/Tk(+/-)-3.7.2C mouse lymphoma cells. , 1998, Mutagenesis.

[9]  N. Kruhlak,et al.  An analysis of genetic toxicity, reproductive and developmental toxicity, and carcinogenicity data: I. Identification of carcinogens using surrogate endpoints. , 2006, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[10]  J. Trent,et al.  Microarrays and toxicology: The advent of toxicogenomics , 1999, Molecular carcinogenesis.

[11]  Michael D Waters,et al.  Toxicogenomic approach for assessing toxicant-related disease. , 2003, Mutation research.

[12]  Michael D Waters,et al.  The impact of new technologies on human population studies. , 2003, Mutation research.

[13]  G. Rubin,et al.  Generation and initial analysis of more than 15,000 full-length human and mouse cDNA sequences , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  Stefan Michiels,et al.  Prediction of cancer outcome with microarrays: a multiple random validation strategy , 2005, The Lancet.

[15]  Lue Ping Zhao,et al.  Phenotypic anchoring of global gene expression profiles induced by N-hydroxy-4-acetylaminobiphenyl and benzo[a]pyrene diol epoxide reveals correlations between expression profiles and mechanism of toxicity. , 2005, Chemical research in toxicology.

[16]  Jiri Aubrecht,et al.  The utility of DNA microarrays for characterizing genotoxicity. , 2004, Environmental health perspectives.

[17]  Frank D Sistare,et al.  Alterations in gene expression profiles and the DNA‐damage response in ionizing radiation‐exposed TK6 cells , 2005, Environmental and molecular mutagenesis.

[18]  Daniel J. Park,et al.  A sequence-oriented comparison of gene expression measurements across different hybridization-based technologies , 2006, Nature Biotechnology.

[19]  Lee Bennett,et al.  Prediction of compound signature using high density gene expression profiling. , 2002, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[20]  Raffaella Corvi,et al.  How to reduce false positive results when undertaking in vitro genotoxicity testing and thus avoid unnecessary follow-up animal tests: Report of an ECVAM Workshop. , 2007, Mutation research.

[21]  D. Melton,et al.  "Stemness": Transcriptional Profiling of Embryonic and Adult Stem Cells , 2002, Science.

[22]  Hanlee P. Ji,et al.  Data quality in genomics and microarrays , 2006, Nature Biotechnology.

[23]  D. Watson,et al.  Relationships between genomic, cell cycle, and mutagenic responses of TK6 cells exposed to DNA damaging chemicals. , 2005, Mutation research.

[24]  P. Bushel,et al.  Identification of distinct and common gene expression changes after oxidative stress and gamma and ultraviolet radiation , 2003, Molecular carcinogenesis.

[25]  John T. Dimos,et al.  A Stem Cell Molecular Signature , 2002, Science.

[26]  Lee Bennett,et al.  Gene expression analysis reveals chemical-specific profiles. , 2002, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[27]  L. Ein-Dor,et al.  Thousands of samples are needed to generate a robust gene list for predicting outcome in cancer. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  L. Samson,et al.  Global response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to an alkylating agent. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  Jiri Aubrecht,et al.  Differentiating mechanisms of toxicity using global gene expression analysis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2005, Mutation research.

[30]  Bryan Frank,et al.  Independence and reproducibility across microarray platforms , 2005, Nature Methods.

[31]  H. Ellinger-Ziegelbauer,et al.  Comparison of the expression profiles induced by genotoxic and nongenotoxic carcinogens in rat liver. , 2005, Mutation research.

[32]  Lutz Müller,et al.  Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens I. Sensitivity, specificity and relative predictivity. , 2005, Mutation research.

[33]  J. Kleinjans,et al.  Discrimination of genotoxic from non-genotoxic carcinogens by gene expression profiling. , 2004, Carcinogenesis.

[34]  R. Storer,et al.  The mouse lymphoma L5178Y Tk+/- cell line is heterozygous for a codon 170 mutation in the p53 tumor suppressor gene. , 1997, Mutation research.

[35]  Weida Tong,et al.  QA/QC: challenges and pitfalls facing the microarray community and regulatory agencies , 2004, Expert review of molecular diagnostics.

[36]  M. Cimino,et al.  Comparative overview of current international strategies and guidelines for genetic toxicology testing for regulatory purposes , 2006, Environmental and molecular mutagenesis.

[37]  Philip M. Long,et al.  Comment on " 'Stemness': Transcriptional Profiling of Embryonic and Adult Stem Cells" and "A Stem Cell Molecular Signature" (I) , 2003, Science.

[38]  Hiroyuki Ogata,et al.  KEGG: Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes , 1999, Nucleic Acids Res..

[39]  Marilyn J Aardema,et al.  Identification of a gene expression profile that discriminates indirect-acting genotoxins from direct-acting genotoxins. , 2004, Mutation research.

[40]  Chang Hee Kim,et al.  Three microarray platforms: an analysis of their concordance in profiling gene expression , 2005, BMC Genomics.

[41]  Micheline Kirsch-Volders,et al.  Indirect mechanisms of genotoxicity. , 2003, Toxicology letters.

[42]  M. Aardema,et al.  Laboratory variability does not preclude identification of biological functions impacted by hydroxyurea , 2005, Environmental and molecular mutagenesis.

[43]  Martha M Moore,et al.  Use of genetic toxicology information for risk assessment , 2005, Environmental and molecular mutagenesis.

[44]  Howard J Federoff,et al.  Dysregulation of Gene Expression in the 1-Methyl-4-Phenyl-1,2,3,6-Tetrahydropyridine-Lesioned Mouse Substantia Nigra , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[45]  Peter J. Tonellato,et al.  The Rat Genome Database (RGD): developments towards a phenome database , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..

[46]  S M Morris,et al.  Gene expression profiles and genetic damage in benzo(a)pyrene diol epoxide-exposed TK6 cells. , 2004, Mutation research.

[47]  D. Kirkland,et al.  Interpretation of the biological relevance of genotoxicity test results: the importance of thresholds. , 2000, Mutation research.

[48]  John Quackenbush,et al.  Multiple-laboratory comparison of microarray platforms , 2005, Nature Methods.

[49]  Kenneth H Buetow,et al.  Interlaboratory comparability study of cancer gene expression analysis using oligonucleotide microarrays. , 2005, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[50]  P. Kasper,et al.  Effects of chlorpromazine with and without UV irradiation on gene expression of HepG2 cells. , 2005, Mutation research.

[51]  Simon Frantz,et al.  An array of problems , 2005, Nature reviews. Drug discovery.

[52]  S. Seidel,et al.  Identification of transcriptome profiles for the DNA‐damaging agents bleomycin and hydrogen peroxide in L5178Y mouse lymphoma cells , 2003, Environmental and molecular mutagenesis.

[53]  Chang-Woo Song,et al.  cDNA microarray gene expression profiling of hydroxyurea, paclitaxel, and p‐anisidine, genotoxic compounds with differing tumorigenicity results , 2003, Environmental and molecular mutagenesis.

[54]  A. Fornace,et al.  Genotoxic‐Stress‐Response Genes and Growth‐Arrest Genes , 1992, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[55]  E. Pereira,et al.  Gene expression profiles in human cells submitted to genotoxic stress. , 2003, Mutation research.

[56]  Ryszard Maleszka,et al.  Microarray reality checks in the context of a complex disease , 2004, Nature Biotechnology.

[57]  J W Green,et al.  A review of the genotoxicity of marketed pharmaceuticals. , 2001, Mutation research.

[58]  J. Kleinjans,et al.  Comparison of supervised clustering methods to discriminate genotoxic from non-genotoxic carcinogens by gene expression profiling. , 2005, Mutation research.

[59]  Tao Han,et al.  Cross-platform comparability of microarray technology: Intra-platform consistency and appropriate data analysis procedures are essential , 2005, BMC Bioinformatics.

[60]  Jason E. Stewart,et al.  Minimum information about a microarray experiment (MIAME)—toward standards for microarray data , 2001, Nature Genetics.

[61]  B. Glickman,et al.  Identification of genes responsive to BPDE treatment in HeLa cells using cDNA expression assays , 2000, Environmental and molecular mutagenesis.

[62]  Lutz Müller,et al.  Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens II. Further analysis of mammalian cell results, relative predictivity and tumour profiles. , 2006, Mutation research.

[63]  P. Kasper,et al.  Human biological relevance and the use of threshold-arguments in regulatory genotoxicity assessment: experience with pharmaceuticals. , 2000, Mutation research.

[64]  Jiri Aubrecht,et al.  Gene expression profile analysis: an emerging approach to investigate mechanisms of genotoxicity. , 2005, Pharmacogenomics.

[65]  M. Bittner,et al.  Fluorescent cDNA microarray hybridization reveals complexity and heterogeneity of cellular genotoxic stress responses , 1999, Oncogene.

[66]  W. von der Hude,et al.  Threshold effects in genetic toxicity: perspective of chemicals regulation in Germany. , 2000, Mutation research.

[67]  N. Kruhlak,et al.  An analysis of genetic toxicity, reproductive and developmental toxicity, and carcinogenicity data: II. Identification of genotoxicants, reprotoxicants, and carcinogens using in silico methods. , 2006, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[68]  Kennedy Gc The impact of genomics on therapeutic drug development. , 2000 .