Multisensory simultaneity recalibration: storage of the aftereffect in the absence of counterevidence

Recent studies show that repeated exposure to an asynchrony between auditory and visual stimuli shifts the point of subjective simultaneity. Usually, the measurement stimuli used to assess this aftereffect are interleaved with short re-exposures to the asynchrony. In a first experiment, we show that the aftereffect declines during measurement in spite of the use of re-exposures. In a second experiment, we investigate whether the observed decline is either due to a dissipation of the aftereffect with the passage of time, or the result of using measurement stimuli with a distribution of asynchronies different from the exposure stimulus. To this end, we introduced a delay before measuring the aftereffects and we compared the magnitude of the aftereffect with and without delay. We find that the aftereffect does not dissipate during the delay but instead is stored until new sensory information in the form of measurement stimuli is presented as counterevidence (i.e., stimuli with an asynchrony that differs from the one used during exposure).

[1]  L. Harris,et al.  Simultaneity constancy: detecting events with touch and vision , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[2]  David Whitaker,et al.  Adaptation minimizes distance-related audiovisual delays. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[3]  Charles Spence,et al.  Temporal recalibration during asynchronous audiovisual speech perception , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[4]  David Whitaker,et al.  Duration channels mediate human time perception , 2011, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[5]  David R. Wozny,et al.  Recalibration of Auditory Space following Milliseconds of Cross-Modal Discrepancy , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[6]  A. Mizuno,et al.  A change of the leading player in flow Visualization technique , 2006, J. Vis..

[7]  Katsumi Aoki,et al.  Recent development of flow visualization , 2004, J. Vis..

[8]  Charles Spence,et al.  Adaptation to audiotactile asynchrony , 2007, Neuroscience Letters.

[9]  H. Helson.  Adaptation-level as frame of reference for prediction of psychophysical data. , 1947, The American journal of psychology.

[10]  D. Whitaker,et al.  Recalibration of perceived time across sensory modalities , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[11]  J. Vroomen,et al.  Temporal recalibration to tactile–visual asynchronous stimuli , 2008, Neuroscience Letters.

[12]  P. Montague,et al.  Motor-Sensory Recalibration Leads to an Illusory Reversal of Action and Sensation , 2006, Neuron.

[13]  Neil W. Roach,et al.  Attention regulates the plasticity of multisensory timing , 2010, The European journal of neuroscience.

[14]  P. Bertelson,et al.  Multisensory integration, perception and ecological validity , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[15]  J. Juola,et al.  Audiovisual synchrony and temporal order judgments: Effects of experimental method and stimulus type , 2008, Perception & psychophysics.

[16]  L. Harris,et al.  The effect of exposure to asynchronous audio, visual, and tactile stimulus combinations on the perception of simultaneity , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[17]  C. Spence,et al.  Multisensory Integration: Maintaining the Perception of Synchrony , 2003, Current Biology.

[18]  P. Bertelson,et al.  Recalibration of temporal order perception by exposure to audio-visual asynchrony. , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[19]  Massimiliano Di Luca,et al.  Recalibration of multisensory simultaneity: cross-modal transfer coincides with a change in perceptual latency. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[20]  A. King,et al.  Multisensory Integration: Strategies for Synchronization , 2005, Current Biology.

[21]  Jean Vroomen,et al.  No effect of auditory–visual spatial disparity on temporal recalibration , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[22]  H. Helson.  Adaptation-level theory : an experimental and systematic approach to behavior , 1964 .

[23]  C. Spence,et al.  Audiovisual temporal adaptation of speech: temporal order versus simultaneity judgments , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[24]  C. Spence,et al.  Adaptation to audiovisual asynchrony modulates the speeded detection of sound , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[25]  M Di Luca,et al.  Recalibration of audiovisual simultaneity , 2010 .

[26]  Charles Spence,et al.  Exposure to asynchronous audiovisual speech extends the temporal window for audiovisual integration. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[27]  S. Kitazawa,et al.  Bayesian calibration of simultaneity in tactile temporal order judgment , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[28]  F A Wichmann,et al.  Ning for Helpful Comments and Suggestions. This Paper Benefited Con- Siderably from Conscientious Peer Review, and We Thank Our Reviewers the Psychometric Function: I. Fitting, Sampling, and Goodness of Fit , 2001 .

[29]  Katsumi Watanabe,et al.  Realignment of temporal simultaneity between vision and touch , 2008, Neuroreport.

[30]  Neil W. Roach,et al.  Asynchrony adaptation reveals neural population code for audio-visual timing , 2010, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[31]  J. Vroomen,et al.  Perception of intersensory synchrony: A tutorial review , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[32]  H. Wallach,et al.  Figural aftereffects; an investigation of visual processes. , 1944 .