An assessment of the intelligent knee prosthesis

Address for correspondence: Stephen Kirker, Disablement Services Centre, Addenbrooke’s Hospital NHS Trust, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, UK. Objectives: To compare gait symmetry, energy expenditure and subjective impressions of transfemoral amputees walking with a standard pneumatic swing-phase control knee and a new type of prosthetic knee. Design: Open crossover study of six users while walking on a treadmill at self-selected slow and fast speeds, and postal questionnaire survey. Setting: Disablement services centre in a teaching hospital. Subjects: Fourteen transfemoral amputees who had been using the intelligent knee prosthesis for more than three months. Main outcome measures: Difference in step length of prosthetic and natural leg as percentage of stride length, oxygen consumption and subjective effort of walking with each type of prosthesis. Results: Gait was more symmetrical with the intelligent knee prosthesis (1 % versus 5% slow, 1 % versus 3% fast, p < 0.05) but oxygen consumption did not differ between prostheses. Users reported less subjective effort walking at normal and fast speeds, outdoors and down slopes and expressed a strong preference for the new prosthesis. Conclusions: Transfemoral amputees’ gait is symmetrical at fast and slow

[1]  G Van der Perre,et al.  Development of an above-knee prosthesis equipped with a microcomputer-controlled knee joint: first test results. , 1992, Journal of biomedical engineering.

[2]  T B Volatile,et al.  The Mauch hydraulic knee unit for above knee amputation. , 1985, Orthopedics.

[3]  A. Hof,et al.  The relationship between comfortable and most metabolically efficient walking speed in persons with unilateral above-knee amputation. , 1993, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[4]  C. T. Huang,et al.  Amputation: energy cost of ambulation. , 1979, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[5]  A. Nene,et al.  Physiological cost index of walking in able-bodied adolescents and adults , 1993 .

[6]  A Bar,et al.  Adaptive microcomputer control of an artificial knee in level walking. , 1983, Journal of biomedical engineering.

[7]  J Stallard,et al.  PHYSIOLOGICAL COST INDEX OF WALKING FOR NORMAL CHILDREN AND ITS USE AS AN INDICATOR OF PHYSICAL HANDICAP , 1984, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[8]  G Van der Perre,et al.  Development of EMG-based mode and intent recognition algorithms for a computer-controlled above-knee prosthesis. , 1990, Journal of biomedical engineering.

[9]  H. Skinner,et al.  Gait analysis in amputees. , 1985, American journal of physical medicine.

[10]  R. Waters,et al.  Energy cost of walking of amputees: the influence of level of amputation. , 1976, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[11]  P J Corcoran,et al.  Energy expenditure of ambulation in patients with above-knee amputations. , 1975, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[12]  Skinner Hb,et al.  Gait analysis in amputees. , 1985 .

[13]  Z Susak,et al.  Energy expenditure and cardiac response in above-knee amputees while using prostheses with open and locked knee mechanisms. , 1985, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine. Supplement.

[14]  E. Stålberg,et al.  Neurophysiological studies on muscle function in the stump of above-knee amputees. , 1973, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[15]  D. A. van der Windt,et al.  Energy expenditure during walking in subjects with tibial rotationplasty, above-knee amputation, or hip disarticulation. , 1992, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[16]  U James Oxygen uptake and heart rate during prosthetic walking in healthy male unilateral above-knee amputees. , 1973, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[17]  Murray Mp,et al.  Gait patterns in above-knee amputee patients: hydraulic swing control vs constant-friction knee components. , 1983 .