Habitat selection by a rare forest antelope: A multi-scale approach combining field data and imagery from three sensors

It can be difficult to further scientific understanding of rare or endangered species that live in inaccessible habitat using traditional methods, such as probabilistic modeling based on field data collection. Remote sensing (RS) can be an important source of information for the study of these animals. A key advantage of RS is its ability to provide information over an animal's complete range, but models incorporating RS data are limited by RS's ability to detect important habitat features. In this study, we focus on the rare, poorly-understood mountain bongo antelope (Tragelaphus euryceros isaaci) which survives in the wild in isolated pockets of montane forest in Kenya. We hypothesize that mountain bongo habitat is multi-scaled. We analyzed field and RS data (derived from SPOT, ASTER, and MODIS) ranging in scale from 0.02–85.93 ha to test our hypothesis. Important microhabitat features were identified through logistic regression models of vegetation structure data collected in plots (0.04 ha) of bongo presence (n=36) and absence (n=90). Models were selected using an information theoretic approach. We analyzed the correlations between microhabitat (four canopy and four understorey structure measures) and RS variables derived using spectral mixture (SMA) and texture analysis; most ASTER and SPOT variables were significantly related with canopy structure variables (max|r|=0.56), but correlations between understorey structure and all but two RS variables were insignificant. Further logistic regression modeling showed that combining field microhabitat (primarily understorey structure variables) and larger-scaled RS measures (ASTER spectral mixture analysis variables aggregated to 450 m (20.25 ha)) provided superior models of bongo habitat selection than those based on field or RS data only. The results demonstrate that: 1) forest canopy characteristics at scales of ~20 ha and understorey structural conditions at the micro-scale of 0.04 ha were the most important features influencing bongo habitat selection; 2) models for predicting bongo habitat distribution must incorporate both micro- and macro-habitat variables; 3) optical RS data may characterize important micro-scale canopy variables with reasonable accuracy, but are ineffective for detecting understorey features (unless alternative techniques such as forest structural indices can be successfully applied); 4) RS and field data are both essential for understanding bongo habitat selection. The technique employed here for understanding this rare antelope's habitat selection may also be applied in studies of other large herbivores.

[1]  P. Vitousek,et al.  Remote analysis of biological invasion and biogeochemical change. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  A. Pusey The behavior guide to African mammals: by Richard Despard Estes, University of California Press, 1991. $75.00 hbk (xxii + 611 pages) ISBN 0 520 05831 3 , 1992 .

[3]  A. Lehmann,et al.  Using Niche‐Based Models to Improve the Sampling of Rare Species , 2006, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[4]  J. Kerr,et al.  From space to species: ecological applications for remote sensing , 2003 .

[5]  Jesse C. Hillman Aspects of the biology of the bongo antelope Tragelaphus eurycerus ogilby 1837 in south west Sudan , 1986 .

[6]  S. Phinn,et al.  Integrating High and Moderate Spatial Resolution Image Data to Estimate Forest Age Structure , 2001 .

[7]  S. Franklin,et al.  Aerial Image Texture Information in the Estimation of Northern Deciduous and Mixed Wood Forest Leaf Area Index (LAI) , 1998 .

[8]  P. McLoughlin,et al.  HIERARCHICAL HABITAT SELECTION , 2004 .

[9]  Dengsheng Lu,et al.  Relationships between forest stand parameters and Landsat TM spectral responses in the Brazilian Amazon Basin , 2004 .

[10]  N. Coops,et al.  Prediction of the spatial distribution and relative abundance of ground-dwelling mammals using remote sensing imagery and simulation models , 2002, Landscape Ecology.

[11]  S. Holm A Simple Sequentially Rejective Multiple Test Procedure , 1979 .

[12]  M. Soulé,et al.  Conservation Biology: The Science of Scarcity and Diversity , 1987 .

[13]  A. Gillespie,et al.  Topographic Normalization of Landsat TM Images of Forest Based on Subpixel Sun–Canopy–Sensor Geometry , 1998 .

[14]  Arne Pommerening,et al.  Approaches to quantifying forest structures , 2002 .

[15]  J. Kingdon East African mammals : an atlas of evolution in Africa , 1972 .

[16]  Annett Bartsch,et al.  Modelling habitat selection and distribution of the critically endangered Jerdon's courser Rhinoptilus bitorquatus in scrub jungle: an application of a new tracking method , 2004 .

[17]  F. Parmiggiani,et al.  An investigation of the textural characteristics associated with gray level cooccurrence matrix statistical parameters , 1995, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[18]  Antoine Guisan,et al.  Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology , 2000 .

[19]  Ian Phillip Vaughan,et al.  Improving the Quality of Distribution Models for Conservation by Addressing Shortcomings in the Field Collection of Training Data , 2003 .

[20]  Dominique Berteaux,et al.  Hierarchical habitat selection by North American porcupines in southern boreal forest , 2005 .

[21]  W. Cohen,et al.  Estimating structural attributes of Douglas-fir/western hemlock forest stands from Landsat and SPOT imagery , 1992 .

[22]  B. Schmid,et al.  Movement Patterns and Home Range Of The Bongo (Tragelaphus Eurycerus) In The Rain Forest Of The Dzanga National Park, Central African Republic , 2000 .

[23]  Lee J. T. White,et al.  What It Will Take to Monitor Forest Elephant Populations , 1999 .

[24]  M Schemper,et al.  Computing measures of explained variation for logistic regression models. , 1999, Computer methods and programs in biomedicine.

[25]  Mark E. Jakubauskas,et al.  International Journal of Remote Sensing a Remote Sensing and Gis-based Model of Habitats and Biodiversity in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem a Remote Sensing and Gis-based Model of Habitats and Biodiversity in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem , 2022 .

[26]  How to convert ASTER radiance values to reflectance. An online guide , 2007 .

[27]  Markus Neumann,et al.  The significance of different indices for stand structure and diversity in forests , 2001 .

[28]  Craig A. Coburn,et al.  SCS+C: a modified Sun-canopy-sensor topographic correction in forested terrain , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[29]  Rhino Ark,et al.  Aerial Survey of the Destruction of the Aberdare Range Forests , 2002 .

[30]  Claude R. Duguay,et al.  Mapping lichen in a caribou habitat of Northern Quebec, Canada, using an enhancement_classification method and spectral mixture analysis , 2005 .

[31]  Thorsten Wiegand,et al.  Assessing the suitability of central European landscapes for the reintroduction of Eurasian lynx , 2002 .

[32]  M. Fladeland,et al.  Remote sensing for biodiversity science and conservation , 2003 .

[33]  W. Cohen,et al.  Integration of lidar and Landsat ETM+ data for estimating and mapping forest canopy height , 2002 .

[34]  J. Wiens Spatial Scaling in Ecology , 1989 .

[35]  Margaret E. Gardner,et al.  Mapping Chaparral in the Santa Monica Mountains Using Multiple Endmember Spectral Mixture Models , 1998 .

[36]  Lesley Gibson,et al.  Spatial prediction of rufous bristlebird habitat in a coastal heathland: a GIS-based approach , 2004 .

[37]  Dr Robert Bryant,et al.  Modelling landscape-scale habitat use using GIS and remote sensing : a case study with great bustards , 2001 .

[38]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model Selection and Multimodel Inference , 2003 .

[39]  R. Shackleton A Quantitative Approach , 2005 .

[40]  J. Hoef,et al.  Distribution and density of moose in relation to landscape characteristics: effects of scale , 2005 .

[41]  S. Ormerod,et al.  New paradigms for modelling species distributions , 2004 .

[42]  Glen S. Watts,et al.  Winter habitat ecology of mountain caribou in relation to forest management , 2000 .

[43]  Grzegorz Mikusiński,et al.  Moose (Alces alces) browsing in young forest stands in central Sweden: A multiscale perspective , 2006 .

[44]  Mark E. Jakubauskas,et al.  A comparison of satellite data and landscape variables in predicting bird species occurrences in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem, USA , 2004, Landscape Ecology.

[45]  W. Walker,et al.  Mapping forest structure for wildlife habitat analysis using multi-sensor (LiDAR, SAR/InSAR, ETM+, Quickbird) synergy , 2006 .

[46]  N. Coops,et al.  High Spatial Resolution Remotely Sensed Data for Ecosystem Characterization , 2004 .

[47]  John B. Adams,et al.  Simple Models For Complex Natural Surfaces: A Strategy For The Hyperspectral Era Of Remote Sensing , 1989, 12th Canadian Symposium on Remote Sensing Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium,.

[48]  Volker C. Radeloff,et al.  High-resolution image texture as a predictor of bird species richness , 2006 .

[49]  Derek R. Peddle,et al.  A Comparison of Spectral Mixture Analysis and Ten Vegetation Indices for Estimating Boreal Forest Biophysical Information from Airborne Data , 2001 .

[50]  Feeding of the Bongo antelope, Tragelaphus eurycerus (Ogilby, 1837), in south west Sudan , 1987 .

[51]  B. Schmid,et al.  Feeding ecology of a large social antelope in the rainforest , 1999, Oecologia.

[52]  K. Bollmann,et al.  The Importance of Spatial Scale in Habitat Models: Capercaillie in the Swiss Alps , 2005, Landscape Ecology.

[53]  B. Schmid,et al.  Geophagy by large mammals at natural licks in the rain forest of the Dzanga National Park, Central African Republic , 1998, Journal of Tropical Ecology.

[54]  Jacques Imbernon,et al.  Pattern and development of land-use changes in the Kenyan highlands since the 1950s , 1999 .

[55]  Steven E. Franklin,et al.  Forest Structure Classification in the North Columbia Mountains Using the Landsat TM Tasseled Cap Wetness Component , 2001 .

[56]  P. Gibbons,et al.  An objective and quantitative methodology for constructing an index of stand structural complexity , 2006 .

[57]  C. Tucker,et al.  NASA’s Global Orthorectified Landsat Data Set , 2004 .

[58]  Alan R. Gillespie,et al.  Structural stage in Pacific Northwest forests estimated using simple mixing models of multispectral images , 2002 .

[59]  R. Latifovic,et al.  Large area forest classification and biophysical parameter estimation using the 5-Scale canopy reflectance model in Multiple-Forward-Mode , 2004 .

[60]  Mark S. Boyce,et al.  A quantitative approach to conservation planning: using resource selection functions to map the distribution of mountain caribou at multiple spatial scales , 2004 .

[61]  Stan Boutin,et al.  The protean relationship between boreal forest landscape structure and red squirrel distribution at multiple spatial scales , 2004, Landscape Ecology.

[62]  Joel C. Trexler,et al.  Nontraditional Regression Analyses , 1993 .

[63]  M. Batistella,et al.  Linear mixture model applied to Amazonian vegetation classification , 2003 .

[64]  P. Defourny,et al.  Retrieving forest structure variables based on image texture analysis and IKONOS-2 imagery , 2006 .

[65]  R. Kock,et al.  Rinderpest epidemic in wild ruminants in Kenya 1993-97 , 1999, Veterinary Record.

[66]  David W. Hosmer,et al.  Applied Logistic Regression , 1991 .