Cervical artificial disc extrusion after a paragliding accident

Background: Cervical total disc replacement (TDR) is an established alternative to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with excellent long-term outcomes and low failure rates. Cases of implant failure and migration are scarce and primarily limited to several years postoperatively. The authors report a case of anterior extrusion of a C4-C5 ProDisc-C (DePuy Synthes, West Chester, PA, USA) cervical artificial disc (CAD) 14 months after placement due to minor trauma. Case Description: A 33-year-old female who had undergone C4-C5 CAD implantation presented with neck pain and spasm after experiencing a paragliding accident. A 4 mm anterior protrusion of the CAD was seen on x-ray. She underwent removal of the CAD followed by anterior fusion. Other cases of CAD extrusion in the literature are discussed and the device's durability and testing are considered. Conclusion: Overall, CAD extrusion is a rare event. This case is likely the result of insufficient osseous integration. Patients undergoing cervical TDR should avoid high-risk activities to prevent trauma that could compromise the disc's placement, and future design/research should focus on how to enhance osseous integration at the interface while minimizing excessive heterotopic ossification.

[1]  K. Schmieder,et al.  Core herniation after implantation of a cervical artificial disc: case report , 2015, European Spine Journal.

[2]  S. Yi,et al.  The Fate of Heterotopic Ossification Associated With Cervical Artificial Disc Replacement , 2014, Spine.

[3]  R. Lehman,et al.  Outcomes of single-level cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion , 2014, Journal of Clinical Neuroscience.

[4]  G. Malham,et al.  Cervical artificial disc replacement with ProDisc-C: Clinical and radiographic outcomes with long-term follow-up , 2014, Journal of Clinical Neuroscience.

[5]  R. Thietje,et al.  An incomplete paraplegia following the dislocation of an artificial cervical total disc replacement. , 2013, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[6]  R. Delamarter,et al.  ProDisc-C and Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion as Surgical Treatment for Single-Level Cervical Symptomatic Degenerative Disc Disease: Five-Year Results of a Food and Drug Administration Study , 2013, Spine.

[7]  T. Wright,et al.  The Mechanical Performance of Cervical Total Disc Replacements In Vivo: Prospective Retrieval Analysis of Prodisc-C Devices , 2012, Spine.

[8]  Zheng Guo,et al.  Implant Failure of Bryan Cervical Disc due to Broken Polyurethane Sheath: A Case Report , 2012, Spine.

[9]  B. Leigh,et al.  Return to work rates and activity profiles: are there differences between those receiving C-ADR and ACDF? , 2012, Evidence-Based Spine-Care Journal EBSJ Focus Issue: Cervical Artificial Disc Replacement.

[10]  A. Hoffmann,et al.  Enhancement of endoprosthesis anchoring using BMP-2. , 2010, Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine.

[11]  L. Tumialán,et al.  Arthroplasty in the military: a preliminary experience with ProDisc-C and ProDisc-L. , 2010, Neurosurgical focus.

[12]  R. Delamarter,et al.  Results of the prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-C total disc replacement versus anterior discectomy and fusion for the treatment of 1-level symptomatic cervical disc disease. , 2009, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[13]  A. Nabhan,et al.  Disc replacement using Pro-Disc C versus fusion: a prospective randomised and controlled radiographic and clinical study , 2007, European Spine Journal.