Investigating Spatial Relationships in Human-Robot Interaction

Co-presence and embodied interaction are two fundamental characteristics of the command and control situation for service robots. This paper presents a study of spatial distances and orientation of a robot with respect to a human user in an experimental setting. Relevant concepts of spatiality from social interaction studies are introduced and related to human-robot interaction (HRI). A Wizard-of-Oz study quantifies the observed spatial distances and spatial formations encountered. However, it is claimed that a simplistic parameterization and measurement of spatial interaction misses the dynamic character and might be counter-productive in the design of socially appropriate robots

[1]  A. Kendon.  Conducting Interaction: Patterns of Behavior in Focused Encounters , 1990 .

[2]  Jannik Fritsch,et al.  "BIRON, let me show you something": evaluating the interaction with a robot companion , 2004, 2004 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37583).

[3]  H. Hüttenrauch,et al.  Making a Case for Spatial Prompting in Human-Robot Communication , 2006 .

[4]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  Navigation for human-robot interaction tasks , 2004, IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2004. Proceedings. ICRA '04. 2004.

[5]  H. H. Clark,et al.  Speaking while monitoring addressees for understanding , 2004 .

[6]  Ray L. Birdwhistell,et al.  Introduction to kinesics : an annotation system for analysis of body motion and gesture , 1952 .

[7]  Gregory D. Abowd,et al.  Human-computer interaction (2nd ed.) , 1998 .

[8]  S. Turkle.  Life on the Screen , 1995 .

[9]  Anders Green,et al.  Integrating Miscommunication Analysis in Natural Language Interface Design for a Service Robot , 2006, 2006 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[10]  Henrik I. Christensen,et al.  Tracking for following and passing persons , 2005, 2005 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[11]  David Lee,et al.  The influence of subjects' personality traits on personal spatial zones in a human-robot interaction experiment , 2005, ROMAN 2005. IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2005..

[12]  E. Hall.  The hidden dimension: an anthropologist examines man's use of space in public and private , 1969 .

[13]  Y. Shiota,et al.  The mobile robot which passes a man , 1997, Proceedings 6th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Communication. RO-MAN'97 SENDAI.

[14]  John Travis Butler,et al.  Psychological Effects of Behavior Patterns of a Mobile Personal Robot , 2001, Auton. Robots.

[15]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Where the action is , 2001 .

[16]  A. Green,et al.  Applying the Wizard-of-Oz framework to cooperative service discovery and configuration , 2004, RO-MAN 2004. 13th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (IEEE Catalog No.04TH8759).

[17]  Kazuo Tanie,et al.  Subjective evaluation of a seal robot at the National Museum of Science and Technology in Stockholm , 2003, The 12th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2003. Proceedings. ROMAN 2003..

[18]  Clifford Nass,et al.  The media equation - how people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places , 1996 .

[19]  Erwin Prassler,et al.  Motion coordination between a human and a mobile robot , 2002, IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[20]  Tetsuo Ono,et al.  Body Movement Analysis of Human-Robot Interaction , 2003, IJCAI.

[21]  E. Goffman.  Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-To-Face Behavior , 1967 .

[22]  Yasushi Nakauchi,et al.  A Social Robot that Stands in Line , 2000, Proceedings. 2000 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2000) (Cat. No.00CH37113).

[23]  Henrik I. Christensen,et al.  Human-robot embodied interaction in hallway settings: a pilot user study , 2005, ROMAN 2005. IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2005..

[24]  Albert E. Scheflen,et al.  Body Language and the Social Order: Communication As Behavioral Control , 1972 .

[25]  R. Shepard.  Ecological constraints on internal representation: resonant kinematics of perceiving, imagining, thinking, and dreaming. , 1984, Psychological review.