SAPFOCS: A metaheuristic based approach to part family formation problems in group technology

Abstract This article deals with Part family formation problem which is believed to be moderately complicated to be solved in polynomial time in the vicinity of Group Technology (GT). In the past literature researchers investigated that the part family formation techniques are principally based on production flow analysis (PFA) which usually considers operational requirements, sequences and time. Part Coding Analysis (PCA) is merely considered in GT which is believed to be the proficient method to identify the part families. PCA classifies parts by allotting them to different families based on their resemblances in: (1) design characteristics such as shape and size, and/or (2) manufacturing characteristics (machining requirements). A novel approach based on simulated annealing namely SAPFOCS is adopted in this study to develop effective part families exploiting the PCA technique. Thereafter Taguchi’s orthogonal design method is employed to solve the critical issues on the subject of parameters selection for the proposed metaheuristic algorithm. The adopted technique is therefore tested on 5 different datasets of size 5 × 9 to 27 × 9 and the obtained results are compared with C-Linkage clustering technique. The experimental results reported that the proposed metaheuristic algorithm is extremely effective in terms of the quality of the solution obtained and has outperformed C-Linkage algorithm in most instances.

[1]  Harold J. Steudel,et al.  A within-cell utilization based heuristic for designing cellular manufacturing systems , 1987 .

[2]  John L. Burbidge,et al.  Production flow analysis for planning group technology , 1991 .

[3]  Inyong Ham,et al.  Multiobjective cluster analysis for part family formations , 1986 .

[4]  R. Rajagopalan,et al.  Design of cellular production systems A graph-theoretic approach , 1975 .

[5]  Amir Azaron,et al.  Solving a dynamic cell formation problem using metaheuristics , 2005, Appl. Math. Comput..

[6]  Jamal Arkat,et al.  Applying simulated annealing to cellular manufacturing system design , 2007 .

[7]  Mikell P. Groover,et al.  CAD/CAM: Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing , 1983 .

[8]  J. King,et al.  Machine-component group formation in group technology: review and extension , 1982 .

[9]  Inyong Ham,et al.  Group Technology: Applications to Production Management , 2011 .

[10]  Jong-Yun Jung,et al.  FORCOD: A coding and classification system for formed parts , 1991 .

[11]  J. King Machine-component grouping in production flow analysis: an approach using a rank order clustering algorithm , 1980 .

[12]  B.H. Ateme-Nguema,et al.  Optimization of cellular manufacturing systems design using the hybrid approach based on the ant colony and tabu search techniques , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management.

[13]  Divakar Rajamani,et al.  Cellular Manufacturing Systems , 1996 .

[14]  T. N. Janakiraman,et al.  Manufacturing Data-Based Combined Dissimilarity Coefficient for Machine Cell Formation , 2002 .

[15]  A. T. Fatheldin Group technology -- Using the opitz system , 1968 .

[16]  Divakar Rajamani,et al.  Cellular Manufacturing Systems Design, Planning and Control , 1996 .

[17]  Philip M. Wolfe,et al.  Application of the Similarity Coefficient Method in Group Technology , 1986 .

[18]  Orlando Durán,et al.  Collaborative particle swarm optimization with a data mining technique for manufacturing cell design , 2010, Expert Syst. Appl..

[19]  Yong Yin,et al.  Similarity coefficient methods applied to the cell formation problem: a comparative investigation , 2005, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[20]  Barthélemy Ateme-Nguema,et al.  Quantized Hopfield networks and tabu search for manufacturing cell formation problems , 2009 .

[21]  D. A. Milner,et al.  Direct clustering algorithm for group formation in cellular manufacture , 1982 .

[22]  Young B. Moon,et al.  Establishment of a neurocomputing model for part family/machine group identification , 1992, J. Intell. Manuf..

[23]  John McAuley,et al.  Machine grouping for efficient production , 1972 .

[24]  Kanchan Das,et al.  Reliability considerations in the design of cellular manufacturing systems: A simulated annealing‐based approach , 2006 .

[25]  G. Srinivasan A clustering algorithm for machine cell formation in group technology using minimum spanning trees , 1994 .

[26]  John M. Wilson,et al.  The evolution of cell formation problem methodologies based on recent studies (1997-2008): Review and directions for future research , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[27]  John L. Burbidge,et al.  Production flow analysis , 1963 .

[28]  M. Chandrasekharan,et al.  An ideal seed non-hierarchical clustering algorithm for cellular manufacturing , 1986 .

[29]  Tai-Hsi Wu,et al.  Hybrid simulated annealing algorithm with mutation operator to the cell formation problem with alternative process routings , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[30]  Nallan C. Suresh,et al.  A neural network system for shape-based classification and coding of rotational parts , 1991 .

[31]  O. Felix Offodile Application of similarity coefficient method to parts coding and classification analysis in group technology , 1991 .

[32]  Warren R. DeVries,et al.  Group technology production methods in manufacture , 1991 .

[33]  Anita Lee-Post,et al.  Part family identification using a simple genetic algorithm , 2000 .

[34]  Reza Tavakkoli-Moghaddam,et al.  A new solution for a dynamic cell formation problem with alternative routing and machine costs using simulated annealing , 2008, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[35]  Farnaz Barzinpour,et al.  Machine–part cell formation using a hybrid particle swarm optimization , 2010 .

[36]  Manojit Chattopadhyay,et al.  Meta-heuristics in cellular manufacturing: A state-of-the-art review , 2011 .

[37]  José David Canca Ortiz,et al.  Cell formation using sequence information and neural networks , 2000 .

[38]  Deming Lei,et al.  Tabu search for multiple-criteria manufacturing cell design , 2006 .