Incorporating long-range physics in atomic-scale machine learning.

The most successful and popular machine learning models of atomic-scale properties derive their transferability from a locality ansatz. The properties of a large molecule or a bulk material are written as a sum over contributions that depend on the configurations within finite atom-centered environments. The obvious downside of this approach is that it cannot capture nonlocal, nonadditive effects such as those arising due to long-range electrostatics or quantum interference. We propose a solution to this problem by introducing nonlocal representations of the system, which are remapped as feature vectors that are defined locally and are equivariant in O(3). We consider, in particular, one form that has the same asymptotic behavior as the electrostatic potential. We demonstrate that this framework can capture nonlocal, long-range physics by building a model for the electrostatic energy of randomly distributed point-charges, for the unrelaxed binding curves of charged organic molecular dimers, and for the electronic dielectric response of liquid water. By combining a representation of the system that is sensitive to long-range correlations with the transferability of an atom-centered additive model, this method outperforms current state-of-the-art machine-learning schemes and provides a conceptual framework to incorporate nonlocal physics into atomistic machine learning.

[1]  Andrea Grisafi,et al.  Symmetry-Adapted Machine Learning for Tensorial Properties of Atomistic Systems. , 2017, Physical review letters.

[2]  Ralf Drautz,et al.  Atomic cluster expansion for accurate and transferable interatomic potentials , 2019, Physical Review B.

[3]  Nongnuch Artrith,et al.  High-dimensional neural-network potentials for multicomponent systems: Applications to zinc oxide , 2011 .

[4]  Peter Sollich,et al.  Accurate interatomic force fields via machine learning with covariant kernels , 2016, 1611.03877.

[5]  Tristan Bereau,et al.  Transferable Atomic Multipole Machine Learning Models for Small Organic Molecules. , 2015, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[6]  Aldo Glielmo,et al.  Efficient nonparametric n -body force fields from machine learning , 2018, 1801.04823.

[7]  Noam Bernstein,et al.  Machine learning unifies the modeling of materials and molecules , 2017, Science Advances.

[8]  P. Alam ‘O’ , 2021, Composites Engineering: An A–Z Guide.

[9]  Stefan Goedecker,et al.  Interatomic potentials for ionic systems with density functional accuracy based on charge densities obtained by a neural network , 2015, 1501.07344.

[10]  Wai-Yim Ching,et al.  Long Range Interactions in Nanoscale Science. , 2010 .

[11]  T. Darden,et al.  A smooth particle mesh Ewald method , 1995 .

[12]  K. Cahill Physical Mathematics by Kevin Cahill , 2013 .

[13]  Matthias Scheffler,et al.  Ab initio molecular simulations with numeric atom-centered orbitals , 2009, Comput. Phys. Commun..

[14]  R. Kjellander Focus Article: Oscillatory and long-range monotonic exponential decays of electrostatic interactions in ionic liquids and other electrolytes: The significance of dielectric permittivity and renormalized charges. , 2018, The Journal of chemical physics.

[15]  A. Pasquarello,et al.  Alignment of Redox Levels at Semiconductor-Water Interfaces , 2018 .

[16]  Justin S. Smith,et al.  Transferable Dynamic Molecular Charge Assignment Using Deep Neural Networks. , 2018, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[17]  W. Kohn,et al.  Nearsightedness of electronic matter. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  J. Herskowitz,et al.  Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA , 1996, Current Biology.

[19]  Chem. , 2020, Catalysis from A to Z.

[20]  Alexander D. MacKerell,et al.  The BioFragment Database (BFDb): An open-data platform for computational chemistry analysis of noncovalent interactions. , 2017, The Journal of chemical physics.

[21]  William L. Jorgensen,et al.  Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling , 2005, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[22]  Yaliang Li,et al.  SCI , 2021, Proceedings of the 30th ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management.

[23]  R. Resta Electrical polarization and orbital magnetization: the modern theories , 2010, Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal.

[24]  Daniel P. Abraham,et al.  Atomistic Modeling of the Electrode–Electrolyte Interface in Li-Ion Energy Storage Systems: Electrolyte Structuring , 2013 .

[25]  P. P. Ewald Die Berechnung optischer und elektrostatischer Gitterpotentiale , 1921 .

[26]  Michele Ceriotti,et al.  Atom-density representations for machine learning. , 2018, The Journal of chemical physics.

[27]  J. Behler First Principles Neural Network Potentials for Reactive Simulations of Large Molecular and Condensed Systems. , 2017, Angewandte Chemie.

[28]  K. Müller,et al.  Fast and accurate modeling of molecular atomization energies with machine learning. , 2011, Physical review letters.

[29]  Matthias Rupp,et al.  Big Data Meets Quantum Chemistry Approximations: The Δ-Machine Learning Approach. , 2015, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[30]  Alexandre Tkatchenko,et al.  Non-covalent interactions across organic and biological subsets of chemical space: Physics-based potentials parametrized from machine learning. , 2017, The Journal of chemical physics.

[31]  Shyue Ping Ong,et al.  An electrostatic spectral neighbor analysis potential for lithium nitride , 2019, npj Computational Materials.

[32]  P. Alam ‘W’ , 2021, Composites Engineering.

[33]  Thomas F. Miller,et al.  Transferability in Machine Learning for Electronic Structure via the Molecular Orbital Basis. , 2018, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[34]  Yang Yang,et al.  Accurate molecular polarizabilities with coupled cluster theory and machine learning , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[35]  R. Kondor,et al.  Gaussian approximation potentials: the accuracy of quantum mechanics, without the electrons. , 2009, Physical review letters.

[36]  R. Dreizler,et al.  Density Functional Theory: An Approach to the Quantum Many-Body Problem , 1991 .

[37]  David W Toth,et al.  The TensorMol-0.1 model chemistry: a neural network augmented with long-range physics , 2017, Chemical science.

[38]  Steve Plimpton,et al.  Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics , 1993 .

[39]  Sereina Riniker,et al.  Machine Learning of Partial Charges Derived from High-Quality Quantum-Mechanical Calculations , 2018, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[40]  Stéphane Mallat,et al.  Wavelet Scattering Regression of Quantum Chemical Energies , 2016, Multiscale Model. Simul..

[41]  Tsuyoshi Murata,et al.  {m , 1934, ACML.

[42]  S. Goedecker,et al.  High accuracy and transferability of a neural network potential through charge equilibration for calcium fluoride , 2017 .

[43]  E Weinan,et al.  Deep Potential Molecular Dynamics: a scalable model with the accuracy of quantum mechanics , 2017, Physical review letters.

[44]  Klaus-Robert Müller,et al.  Machine learning of accurate energy-conserving molecular force fields , 2016, Science Advances.

[45]  Gábor Csányi,et al.  Comparing molecules and solids across structural and alchemical space. , 2015, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[46]  Michele Parrinello,et al.  Generalized neural-network representation of high-dimensional potential-energy surfaces. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[47]  Risi Kondor,et al.  Publisher’s Note: On representing chemical environments [Phys. Rev. B 87 , 184115 (2013)] , 2013 .

[48]  Raffaele Resta,et al.  MACROSCOPIC POLARIZATION IN CRYSTALLINE DIELECTRICS : THE GEOMETRIC PHASE APPROACH , 1994 .