The control of sequential goal-directed movement: learning to use feedback or central planning?

Fifteen participants practiced a two-target sequential aiming movement with either full vision of the movement environment, vision during flight, or vision while in contact with the first target. After 100 acquisition trials, participants performed a retention test in their own condition and then were transferred to each of the other two vision conditions. Both performance and kinematic data indicated that rather than becoming less dependent on visual information with practice, subjects learned to adjust their movement trajectories to use the visual information available in their particular vision condition. Although transfer to a degraded vision condition disrupted performance, when vision was augmented participants quickly adjusted their aiming trajectories to use the added information. The findings suggest that at least part of learning involves the development of rapid and efficient procedures for processing afferent information, including visual response-produced feedback.

[1]  L. Carlton Processing visual feedback information for movement control. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[2]  Romeo Chua,et al.  Discrete vs. continuous visual control of manual aiming , 1991 .

[3]  D Elliott,et al.  Intermittent Vision and Discrete Manual Aiming , 1995, Perceptual and motor skills.

[4]  D. Elliott,et al.  Visual regulation of manual aiming , 1993 .

[5]  D. Elliott,et al.  The influence of intermittent vision on manual aiming. , 1994, Acta psychologica.

[6]  D Elliott,et al.  Optimizing the use of Vision in Manual Aiming: The Role of Practice , 1995, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[7]  R A Abrams,et al.  Optimality in human motor performance: ideal control of rapid aimed movements. , 1988, Psychological review.