THE IMPACT OF COMMUNICATION MEDIA ON NEGOTIATION OUTCOMES

Our need to understand the impact of communication media on negotiation is growing as technological advances offer negotiators more communication options. As access to technologies such as computer chat and videoconferencing increases, negotiators are choosing to use or to avoid these media without knowing the impact of their choices on negotiations. This research assesses objective and subjective negotiation outcomes, such as profit and outcome satisfaction, across four communication media with varying levels of media richness (face‐to‐face, videoconference, telephone, and computer‐mediated communication). A conceptual framework is offered to illustrate how media richness impacts objective and subjective outcomes. Results suggest that media richness affects required bargaining time, outcome satisfaction and the desire for future negotiation interaction. Thus, the communication media for negotiations should be chosen with care.

[1]  Terri R. Kurtzberg,et al.  Long and Short Routes to Success in Electronically Mediated Negotiations: Group Affiliations and Good Vibrations. , 1999, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[2]  L. Greenhalgh,et al.  Negotiator Relationships: Construct Measurement, and Demonstration of Their Impact on the Process and Outcomes of Negotiation , 1998 .

[3]  A. Hollingshead.  Information Suppression and Status Persistence in Group Decision Making The Effects of Communication Media , 1996 .

[4]  Max H. Bazerman,et al.  Negotiating over Time: Impediments to Integrative Solutions , 1995 .

[5]  William N. Dilla,et al.  Judgment Accuracy and Outcomes in Negotiation: A Causal Modeling Analysis of Decision-Aiding Effects , 1995 .

[6]  J. Sheffield.  The effect of communication medium on negotiation performance , 1995 .

[7]  Dale E. Brashers,et al.  The Power of Language in Computer-Mediated Groups , 1995 .

[8]  D. A. D. Rose,et al.  A review of eye-to-eye videoconferencing techniques , 1995 .

[9]  R. Oliver,et al.  Outcome Satisfaction in Negotiation: A Test of Expectancy Disconfirmation , 1994 .

[10]  Susan G. Straus,et al.  Does the medium matter? The interaction of task type and technology on group performance and member reactions. , 1994, The Journal of applied psychology.

[11]  J. McGrath,et al.  Group Task Performance and Communication Technology , 1993 .

[12]  Phillip A. Lewis,et al.  Toward a Theory of Agenda Setting in Negotiations , 1993 .

[13]  W. Orlikowski,et al.  Genres of Organizational Communication: A Structurational Approach to Studying Communication and Media , 1992 .

[14]  J. Walther.  Interpersonal Effects in Computer-Mediated Interaction , 1992 .

[15]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Communication Media and Negotiation Processes , 1992 .

[16]  L. Thompson.  Negotiation behavior and outcomes: Empirical evidence and theoretical issues. , 1990 .

[17]  C. Steinfield,et al.  A Social Influence Model of Technology use , 1990 .

[18]  R. Daft,et al.  The Selection of Communication Media as an Executive Skill , 1988 .

[19]  Michael D. Robinson,et al.  Buyer-Seller Negotiations around the Pacific Rim: Differences in Fundamental Exchange Processes , 1988 .

[20]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Message Equivocality, Media Selection, and Manager Performance: Implications for Information Systems , 1987, MIS Q..

[21]  R. Rice,et al.  Electronic Emotion , 1987 .

[22]  Lee Sproull,et al.  Reducing social context cues: electronic mail in organizational communication , 1986 .

[23]  A. Isen,et al.  The Influence of Positive Affect and Visual Access on the Discovery of Integrative Solutions in Bilateral Negotiation , 1986 .

[24]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[25]  Sara Kiesler,et al.  Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication , 1984 .

[26]  D. G. Pruitt,et al.  Resistance to yielding and the expectation of cooperative future interaction in negotiation. , 1984 .

[27]  Steven D. Seilheimer,et al.  Looking and Competing: Accountability and Visual Access in Integrative Bargaining , 1981 .

[28]  Steven A. Lewis,et al.  Effects of visual access and orientation on the discovery of integrative bargaining alternatives , 1977 .

[29]  Ederyn Williams,et al.  Experimental comparisons of face-to-face and mediated communication: A review. , 1977 .

[30]  E. G. Shapiro,et al.  Effect of expectations of future interaction on reward allocations in dyads: Equity or equality. , 1975 .

[31]  S. Kiesler,et al.  The effect of commitment to future interaction on reactions to norm violations. , 1967, Journal of personality.