Simulating the fate of Florida Snowy Plovers with sea-level rise: Exploring research and management priorities with a global uncertainty and sensitivity analysis perspective

Abstract Changes in coastal habitats due to sea-level rise provide an uncertain, yet significant threat to shoreline dependent birds. Rising sea levels can cause habitat fragmentation and loss which can result in considerable reduction in their foraging and nesting areas. Computational models and their algorithmic assumptions play an integral role in exploring potential mitigation responses to uncertain and potentially adverse ecological outcomes. The presence of uncertainty in metapopulation models is widely acknowledged but seldom considered in their development and evaluation, specifically the effects of uncertain model inputs on the model outputs. This paper was aimed to (1) quantify the contribution of each uncertain input factor to the uncertainty in the output of a metapopulation model which evaluated the effects of long-term sea-level rise on the population of Snowy Plovers ( Charadrius alexandrinus ) found in the Gulf Coast of Florida, and (2) determine the ranges of model inputs that produced a specific output for the purpose of formulating environmental management decisions. This was carried out by employing global sensitivity and uncertainty analysis (GSA) using two generic (model independent) methods, the qualitative screening Morris method and a quantitative variance-based Sobol’ method coupled with Monte Carlo filtering. The analyses were applied to three density dependence scenarios: assuming a ceiling-type density dependence, assuming a contest-type density dependence, and assuming that density dependence is uncertain as to being ceiling- or contest-dependent. The sources of uncertainty in the outputs depended strongly on the type of density dependence considered in the model. In general, uncertainty in the outputs highly depended on the uncertainty in stage matrix elements (fecundity, adult survival, and juvenile survival), dispersal rate from central areas with low current populations (the “Big Bend” area of Florida) to the northern, panhandle populations, the maximum growth rate, and density dependence type. Our results showed that increasing the maximum growth rate to a value of 1.2 or larger will increase the final average population of Snowy Plovers assuming a contest-type density dependence. Results suggest that studies that further quantify which density dependence relationship best describes Snowy Plover population dynamics should be conducted since this is the main driver of uncertainty in model outcomes. Furthermore, investigating the presence of Snowy Plovers in the Big Bend region may be important for providing connection between the panhandle and peninsula populations.

[1]  Donald L. DeAngelis,et al.  UNCERTAINTY IN SPATIALLY EXPLICIT ANIMAL DISPERSAL MODELS , 2003 .

[2]  R. G. Hughes.  Climate change and loss of saltmarshes: consequences for birds , 2004 .

[3]  Garey A. Fox,et al.  Influence of flow concentration on parameter importance and prediction uncertainty of pesticide trapping by vegetative filter strips , 2010 .

[4]  Hugh P Possingham,et al.  Making conservation decisions under uncertainty for the persistence of multiple species. , 2007, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[5]  Rafael Muñoz-Carpena,et al.  GLOBAL SENSITIVITY AND UNCERTAINTY ANALYSES OF THE WATER QUALITY MODEL VFSMOD-W , 2007 .

[6]  Andrea Saltelli,et al.  An effective screening design for sensitivity analysis of large models , 2007, Environ. Model. Softw..

[7]  R. Jones,et al.  Global Climate Change and Sea Level Rise: Potential Losses of Intertidal Habitat for Shorebirds , 2002 .

[8]  H. Akçakaya,et al.  Assessing human impact despite uncertainty:viability of the northern spotted owl metapopulation in the northwestern USA , 1998, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[9]  T. W. White,et al.  Sea-level rise: Destruction of threatened and endangered species habitat in South Carolina , 1993 .

[10]  David B Lobell,et al.  Remote sensing of soil degradation: introduction. , 2010, Journal of environmental quality.

[11]  Igor Linkov,et al.  Exploring vulnerability of coastal habitats to sea level rise through global sensitivity and uncertainty analyses , 2011, Environ. Model. Softw..

[12]  Ilya M. Sobol,et al.  Sensitivity Estimates for Nonlinear Mathematical Models , 1993 .

[13]  Stefano Tarantola,et al.  Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis in spatial modelling based on GIS , 2000 .

[14]  M. Hassell,et al.  Detecting density dependence. , 1986, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[15]  A. Saltelli,et al.  Sensitivity analysis for chemical models. , 2005, Chemical reviews.

[16]  S. Rahmstorf,et al.  Global sea level linked to global temperature , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  G. Hess.  Linking Extinction to Connectivity and Habitat Destruction in Metapopulation Models , 1996, The American Naturalist.

[18]  Igor Linkov,et al.  The impact of sea‐level rise on Snowy Plovers in Florida: integrating geomorphological, habitat, and metapopulation models , 2011 .

[19]  David B. Lindenmayer,et al.  MANAGING LANDSCAPES FOR CONSERVATION UNDER UNCERTAINTY , 2005 .

[20]  Sue Abbott,et al.  Evidence that human disturbance reduces Snowy Plover chick survival , 2003 .

[21]  J M R Curtis,et al.  Sensitivity of population viability to spatial and nonspatial parameters using GRIP. , 2008, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[22]  Max D. Morris,et al.  Factorial sampling plans for preliminary computational experiments , 1991 .

[23]  James N. Hall,et al.  AGE-RELATED SURVIVAL AND BEHAVIOR OF SNOWY PLOVER CHICKS , 2007 .

[24]  Saltelli Andrea,et al.  Global Sensitivity Analysis: The Primer , 2008 .

[25]  Paul Opdam,et al.  Metapopulation theory and habitat fragmentation: a review of holarctic breeding bird studies , 1991, Landscape Ecology.

[26]  S. Dinsmore,et al.  Apparent Survival and Population Growth of Snowy Plovers in Coastal Northern California , 2010 .

[27]  Helen M. Regan,et al.  Treatments of Uncertainty and Variability in Ecological Risk Assessment of Single-Species Populations , 2003 .

[28]  Rafael Muñoz-Carpena,et al.  Parameter importance and uncertainty in predicting runoff pesticide reduction with filter strips. , 2010, Journal of environmental quality.

[29]  W. Sutherland,et al.  Quantifying density dependence in a bird population using human disturbance , 2007, Oecologia.

[30]  A. Saltelli,et al.  The role of sensitivity analysis in ecological modelling , 2007 .

[31]  H. Akçakaya,et al.  Viability analyses with habitat-based metapopulation models , 2000, Population Ecology.

[32]  Rikk G. Kvitek,et al.  Effects of human activity on the foraging behavior of sanderlings Calidris alba , 2003 .

[33]  H. Akçakaya,et al.  Linking population-level risk assessment with landscape and habitat models. , 2001, The Science of the total environment.

[34]  Hugh P Possingham,et al.  Accounting for uncertainty in marine reserve design. , 2006, Ecology letters.

[35]  A. Hastings,et al.  Density dependence : are we searching at the wrong spatial scale ? , 1996 .

[36]  Paola Annoni,et al.  Sixth International Conference on Sensitivity Analysis of Model Output How to avoid a perfunctory sensitivity analysis , 2010 .

[37]  I. Hanski.  Habitat connectivity, habitat continuity, and metapopulations in dynamic landscapes , 1999 .

[38]  Rafael Muñoz-Carpena,et al.  Development, Testing, and Sensitivity and Uncertainty Analyses of a Transport and Reaction Simulation Engine (TaRSE) for Spatially Distributed Modeling of Phosphorus in South Florida Peat Marsh Wetlands , 2008 .

[39]  Joanna Burger,et al.  Physical and social determinants of nest-site selection in piping plover in New Jersey , 1987 .

[40]  Toyonobu Fujii,et al.  Sea-level rise, expected environmental changes, and responses of intertidal benthic macrofauna in the Humber estuary, UK , 2008 .

[41]  H. Akçakaya,et al.  A Habitat‐Based Metapopulation Model of the California Gnatcatcher , 1997 .

[42]  Hong S. He,et al.  Integrating Landscape and Metapopulation Modeling Approaches: Viability of the Sharp‐Tailed Grouse in a Dynamic Landscape , 2004 .

[43]  Robert P. Anderson,et al.  Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions , 2006 .

[44]  M. Convertino,et al.  Scale- and resolution-invariance of suitable geographic range for shorebird metapopulations , 2011 .

[45]  W. T. Pfeffer,et al.  Kinematic Constraints on Glacier Contributions to 21st-Century Sea-Level Rise , 2008, Science.

[46]  Stefano Tarantola,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis in Practice: A Guide to Assessing Scientific Models , 2004 .

[47]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  PATCH OCCUPANCY MODELS OF METAPOPULATION DYNAMICS: EFFICIENT PARAMETER ESTIMATION USING IMPLICIT STATISTICAL INFERENCE , 1999 .

[48]  Robert P Freckleton,et al.  Census error and the detection of density dependence. , 2006, The Journal of animal ecology.

[49]  Thorsten Wiegand,et al.  Dealing with Uncertainty in Spatially Explicit Population Models , 2004, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[50]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  METAPOPULATION DYNAMICS: EFFECTS OF HABITAT QUALITY AND LANDSCAPE STRUCTURE , 1998 .

[51]  J. D. Goss-Custard,et al.  Towards predicting the effect of loss of intertidal feeding areas on overwintering shorebirds (Charadrii) and shelduck (Tadorna tadorna) : Refinements and tests of a model developed for the Wash, east England , 1996 .

[52]  A. Poole,et al.  Snowy Plover (Charadrius alexandrinus) , 1995 .

[53]  Andrea Saltelli,et al.  Screening important inputs in models with strong interaction properties , 2009, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[54]  J. Lawton,et al.  A test of statistical techniques for detecting density dependence in sequential censuses of animal populations , 1987, Oecologia.

[55]  L. Birch,et al.  The intrinsic rate of natural increase of an insect population , 1948 .