Dynamic Effects of Self-Relevance and Task on the Neural Processing of Emotional Words in Context

We used event-related potentials (ERPs) to examine the interactions between task, emotion, and contextual self-relevance on processing words in social vignettes. Participants read scenarios that were in either third person (other-relevant) or second person (self-relevant) and we recorded ERPs to a neutral, pleasant, or unpleasant critical word. In a previously reported study (Fields and Kuperberg, 2012) with these stimuli, participants were tasked with producing a third sentence continuing the scenario. We observed a larger LPC to emotional words than neutral words in both the self-relevant and other-relevant scenarios, but this effect was smaller in the self-relevant scenarios because the LPC was larger on the neutral words (i.e., a larger LPC to self-relevant than other-relevant neutral words). In the present work, participants simply answered comprehension questions that did not refer to the emotional aspects of the scenario. Here we observed quite a different pattern of interaction between self-relevance and emotion: the LPC was larger to emotional vs. neutral words in the self-relevant scenarios only, and there was no effect of self-relevance on neutral words. Taken together, these findings suggest that the LPC reflects a dynamic interaction between specific task demands, the emotional properties of a stimulus, and contextual self-relevance. We conclude by discussing implications and future directions for a functional theory of the emotional LPC.

[1]  E. Donchin,et al.  Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating? , 1988, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[2]  Gina R. Kuperberg,et al.  It's All About You: An ERP Study of Emotion and Self-Relevance in Discourse , 2012, NeuroImage.

[3]  Tad T. Brunyé,et al.  Better you than I: Perspectives and emotion simulation during narrative comprehension , 2011 .

[4]  Eric C. Fields,et al.  Loving yourself more than your neighbor: ERPs reveal online effects of a self-positivity bias. , 2015, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[5]  Jonas K. Olofsson,et al.  Affective picture processing: An integrative review of ERP findings , 2008, Biological Psychology.

[6]  Dan Foti,et al.  Tell me about it: neural activity elicited by emotional pictures and preceding descriptions. , 2009, Emotion.

[7]  Annmarie MacNamara,et al.  ERPs and the Study of Emotion , 2011 .

[8]  J. Polich Updating P300: An integrative theory of P3a and P3b , 2007, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[9]  W. Ziegler The Oxford Handbook Of Event Related Potential Components , 2016 .

[10]  Olesya Govorun,et al.  Better-than-Average Effect , 2020, Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences.

[11]  A. Keil,et al.  Neural Substrate of the Late Positive Potential in Emotional Processing , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[12]  J. Polich Updating P 300 : An Integrative Theory of P 3 a and P 3 b , 2009 .

[13]  S. Luck,et al.  ERP Components: The Ups and Downs of Brainwave Recordings , 2011 .

[14]  Andreas Keil,et al.  Emotional perception: Correspondence of early and late event-related potentials with cortical and subcortical functional MRI , 2013, Biological Psychology.

[15]  Swann Self-Verification Theory , 2012 .

[16]  Werner Sommer,et al.  Reading emotional words within sentences: the impact of arousal and valence on event-related potentials. , 2010, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[17]  Marina Schmid,et al.  An Introduction To The Event Related Potential Technique , 2016 .

[18]  G. Hajcak,et al.  Differentiating neural responses to emotional pictures: evidence from temporal-spatial PCA. , 2009, Psychophysiology.

[19]  Swann,et al.  Self-verification theory. , 2012 .

[20]  Francesca M. M. Citron Neural correlates of written emotion word processing: A review of recent electrophysiological and hemodynamic neuroimaging studies , 2012, Brain and Language.

[21]  J. Tenenbaum,et al.  A tutorial introduction to Bayesian models of cognitive development , 2011, Cognition.

[22]  Tad T. Brunyé,et al.  When You and I Share Perspectives , 2009, Psychological science.

[23]  Yue Ge,et al.  Anxiety and outcome evaluation: The good, the bad and the ambiguous , 2010, Biological Psychology.

[24]  Simon Rigoulot,et al.  Arousal and valence effects on event-related P3a and P3b during emotional categorization. , 2006, International Journal of Psychophysiology.

[25]  Werner Sommer,et al.  P1 and beyond: functional separation of multiple emotion effects in word recognition. , 2012, Psychophysiology.

[26]  J. Stainer,et al.  The Emotions , 1922, Nature.

[27]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Decision making, the P3, and the locus coeruleus-norepinephrine system. , 2005, Psychological bulletin.

[28]  G. Hajcak,et al.  Event-Related Potentials, Emotion, and Emotion Regulation: An Integrative Review , 2010, Developmental neuropsychology.

[29]  G. McCarthy,et al.  Augmenting mental chronometry: the P300 as a measure of stimulus evaluation time. , 1977, Science.

[30]  M. Bradley,et al.  Emotional perception: correlation of functional MRI and event-related potentials. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[31]  P. Pauli,et al.  Self-reference modulates the processing of emotional stimuli in the absence of explicit self-referential appraisal instructions. , 2011, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[32]  M. Bradley,et al.  Brain potentials in affective picture processing: covariation with autonomic arousal and affective report , 2000, Biological Psychology.

[33]  S. Kelly,et al.  The classic P300 encodes a build‐to‐threshold decision variable , 2015, The European journal of neuroscience.

[34]  A. Clark Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. , 2013, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[35]  Martin Paczynski,et al.  When Events Change Their Nature: The Neurocognitive Mechanisms Underlying Aspectual Coercion , 2014, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[36]  G. Kuperberg,et al.  Vivid: How valence and arousal influence word processing under different task demands , 2016, Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience.

[37]  Markus Junghöfer,et al.  Selective Visual Attention to Emotion , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[38]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Active inference and epistemic value , 2015, Cognitive neuroscience.

[39]  Avgusta Y Shestyuk,et al.  Automatic and strategic representation of the self in major depression: trait and state abnormalities. , 2010, The American journal of psychiatry.

[40]  P. Hagoort,et al.  ERP evidence on the interaction between information structure and emotional salience of words , 2013, Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience.

[41]  Ramin Assadollahi,et al.  Emotional and semantic networks in visual word processing: insights from ERP studies. , 2006, Progress in brain research.

[42]  Gina R. Kuperberg,et al.  Neurophysiological Correlates of Comprehending Emotional Meaning in Context , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[43]  Wei Li,et al.  Perspective taking modulates event-related potentials to perceived pain , 2010, Neuroscience Letters.

[44]  G. Kuperberg,et al.  Reversing expectations during discourse comprehension , 2015, Language, cognition and neuroscience.

[45]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Bioelectrical echoes from evaluative categorization: II. A late positive brain potential that varies as a function of attitude registration rather than attitude report. , 1995, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[46]  J. Polich Neuropsychology of P300 , 2011 .

[47]  Margaret Bradley,et al.  Event-related potential studies of language and emotion: words, phrases, and task effects. , 2006, Progress in brain research.

[48]  Hiroshi Nittono,et al.  Motivational significance and cognitive effort elicit different late positive potentials , 2015, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[49]  T. Ethofer,et al.  His or mine? The time course of self–other discrimination in emotion processing , 2011, Social neuroscience.

[50]  R. Heuser Surprise, surprise , 2014, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[51]  S. Geisser,et al.  On methods in the analysis of profile data , 1959 .

[52]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  The N400 as a function of the level of processing. , 1995, Psychophysiology.

[53]  Richard N. Aslin,et al.  Learning to Represent a Multi-Context Environment: More than Detecting Changes , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[54]  Shelley E. Taylor,et al.  Illusion and well-being: a social psychological perspective on mental health. , 1988, Psychological bulletin.

[55]  Michael Inzlicht,et al.  The Devil You Know , 2008, Psychological science.

[56]  Sebastian Schindler,et al.  It’s all in your head – how anticipating evaluation affects the processing of emotional trait adjectives , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[57]  G. Gratton,et al.  A Psychophysiological Examination of Cognitive Processing of and Affective Responses to Social Expectancy Violations , 2001, Psychological science.

[58]  Anna Weinberg,et al.  Emotional targets: evaluative categorization as a function of context and content. , 2012, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[59]  P. V. Lange,et al.  Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology , 2011 .

[60]  G. Kuperberg,et al.  Friendly drug-dealers and terrifying puppies: Affective primacy can attenuate the N400 effect in emotional discourse contexts , 2013, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.