On the Relative Importance of Haplo-Diploidy, Assortative Mating and Social Synergy on the Evolutionary Emergence of Social Behavior

Advances in multiagent simulation techniques make it possible to study more realistic dynamics of complex systems and allow evolutionary theories to be tested. Here I use simulations to assess the relative importance of reproductive systems (haplodiploidy vs. diploidy), mate selection (assortative mating vs. random mating) and social economics (pay-off matrices of evolutionary games) in the evolutionary dynamics leading to the emergence of social cooperation in the provision of parental care. The simulations confirm that haplo-diploid organisms and organisms mating assortatively have a higher probability for fixing alleles and require less favorable conditions for their fixation, than diploids or organisms mating randomly. The simulations showed that social behavior was most likely to emerge a) when the cost for parental investment was much lower than the benefits to the offspring, b) when cooperation improved synergistically the fitness of offspring compared to the corresponding egoistic behavior and c) when alleles coding for altruistic or social behavior could be rapidly fixed in the population, thanks to mechanisms such as haplo-diploidy and/or assortative mating. Cooperative social behavior always appeared if sociality conferred much higher fitness gains compared to non cooperative alternatives suggesting that the most important factors for the emergence and maintenance of social behavior are those based on energetic or efficiency considerations. The simulations, in congruence with the scant experimental evidence available, suggest that economic considerations rather than genetic ones are critical in explaining the emergence and maintenance of sociality.

[1]  D. E. Matthews Evolution and the Theory of Games , 1977 .

[2]  W. Hamilton The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I. , 1964, Journal of theoretical biology.

[3]  M. Hoy,et al.  Premating Isolation in a Simulation Model Generates Frequency-Dependent Selection and Alters Establishment Rates of Resistant Natural Enemies , 1995 .

[4]  J. Strassmann,et al.  Genetic Relatedness in Colonies of Tropical Wasps with Multiple Queens , 1988, Science.

[5]  D. Buss,et al.  Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures , 1989, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[6]  H. Reeve Haplodiploidy, Eusociality and Absence of Male Parental and Alloparental Care in Hymenoptera: A Unifying Genetic Hypothesis Distinct from Kin Selection Theory , 1993 .

[7]  Bradley G. Mullen,et al.  Sociobiology: A New Synthesis? , 1981 .

[8]  D. Weeks,et al.  Two-Sex Models: Chaos, Extinction, and Other Dynamic Consequences of Sex , 1986, The American Naturalist.

[9]  S. Otto,et al.  The evolution of life cycles with haploid and diploid phases , 1998 .

[10]  S. Levin,et al.  Mathematical and Computational Challenges in Population Biology and Ecosystems Science , 1997, Science.

[11]  R. Cressman Complex dynamical behaviour of frequency-dependent viability selection: an example. , 1988, Journal of theoretical biology.

[12]  Bernard J. Crespi,et al.  The Evolution of Social Behavior in Insects and Arachnids: Acknowledgements , 1997 .

[13]  K. Jaffe,et al.  On the energetic cost of sociality , 1996, Physiology & Behavior.

[14]  K. Jaffe,et al.  Dynamics of the emergence of genetic resistance to biocides among asexual and sexual organisms. , 1997, Journal of theoretical biology.

[15]  R. Gadagkar Evolution of eusociality: the advantage of assured fitness returns , 1990 .

[16]  Klaus Jaffe,et al.  Sex, Mate Selection, and Evolution , 1998, Evolutionary Programming.

[17]  Fyodor A. Kondrashov,et al.  Interactions among quantitative traits in the course of sympatric speciation , 1999, Nature.

[18]  Charles D. Michener,et al.  The Social Behavior of the Bees , 1974 .

[19]  K. Jaffe,et al.  Energy Consumption of Termite Colonies of Nasutitermes ephratae (Isoptera: Termitidae) , 1999, Physiology & Behavior.

[20]  Derek A. Roff,et al.  The evolution of life histories : theory and analysis , 1992 .

[21]  D. Queller Extended parental care and the origin of eusociality , 1994, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[22]  David E. Goldberg,et al.  Genetic Algorithms in Search Optimization and Machine Learning , 1988 .

[23]  D.,et al.  THE EVOLUTION OF SOCIAL BEHAVIOR , 2002 .

[24]  K. Jaffe,et al.  Energetics of social phenomena: Physics applied to evolutionary biology , 1994 .

[25]  U. Dieckmann,et al.  On the origin of species by sympatric speciation , 1999, Nature.

[26]  Klaus Jaffe,et al.  On the Adaptive Value of Some Mate Selection Strategies , 1999 .

[27]  K. Jaffe,et al.  Assortative mating: sex differences in mate selection for married and unmarried couples. , 1995, Human biology.

[28]  G. Ochoa,et al.  On sex, mate selection and the red queen. , 1999, Journal of theoretical biology.

[29]  J. Bull Evolution of sex determining mechanisms , 1983 .

[30]  H. Simon,et al.  A mechanism for social selection and successful altruism. , 1990, Science.

[31]  K. Jaffe Emergence and Maintenance of Sex among Diploid Organisms Aided by Assortative Mating , 2000, Acta biotheoretica.

[32]  D. Ruelle Chance and Chaos , 2020 .

[33]  Peter M. Todd,et al.  Evolutionary wanderlust: sexual selection with directional mate preferences , 1993 .

[34]  W. L. Payne,et al.  High Mutation Frequencies Among Escherichia coli and Salmonella Pathogens , 1996, Science.