Prosodic mitigation characterizes Catalan formal speech: The Frequency Code reassessed

Abstract Research in the past few decades has claimed that high or rising fundamental frequency (F0) signals a set of meanings related to the expression of politeness (e.g., deference, submission or lack of confidence (Gussenhoven, 2004; Ohala, 1984)). In this regard, the Frequency Code has been proposed to explain the universal tendency for high pitch to be interpreted as related to politeness and other sociopragmatic meanings (Gussenhoven, 2004; Gussenhoven, Chen, & Rietveld, 2002; Ohala, 1984). Recently, however, some experimental research has questioned the universality of the Frequency Code and pointed to the importance of taking other prosodic parameters into account (e.g., Brown & Levinson, 1987; Grawunder, Oertel, & Schwarze, 2014; Winter & Grawunder, 2012). Clearly, further work is needed before the question of universal tendencies in the prosodic encoding of politeness can be conclusively settled. The present study attempts to help fill that gap. Twenty Catalan speakers participated in an oral discourse elicitation task designed to investigate the prosodic components of politeness in requests in formal register speech compared to informal speech by not only analysing F0 parameters but also taking into account other prosodic parameters such as duration, voice quality and intensity, and controlling for the use of phonological intonational patterns. Results showed that subjects exhibited a slower speech rate, a lower mean pitch, less intensity, less shimmer and less jitter and an increase in H1–H2 in the formal condition. Thus, contrary to previous claims, the Frequency Code appears not to hold for this language. Rather, our results support the idea that Catalan speakers use a phonetic mitigation strategy involving various prosodic correlates. After comparing our findings with the results reported in previous literature for other languages, we entertain the hypothesis that prosodic mitigation may well play a strong role in marking politeness cross-linguistically.

[1]  Mika Ito Politeness and Voice Quality – The Alternative Method to Measure Aspiration Noise , 2004 .

[2]  辻 亜希子,et al.  The case study of high pitch register in English and in Japanese : Does high pitch register relate to politeness? (五十嵐康男・北川重男両教授退職記念号) , 2004 .

[3]  Jonathan Culpeper,et al.  'It's not what you said, it's how you said it!': Prosody and impoliteness , 2011 .

[4]  Pilar Prieto,et al.  (Im)politeness: Prosody and Gesture , 2017 .

[5]  E. Gilboa-Schechtman,et al.  Acoustic Properties of Dominance and Request Utterances in Social Anxiety , 2013 .

[6]  Pilar Prieto,et al.  Pitch range, gestural information, and perceived politeness in Catalan , 2011 .

[7]  J. C. Félix-Brasdefer Data collection methods in speech act performance: DCTs, role plays, and verbal reports , 2010 .

[8]  GUDRUN HELD,et al.  On the role of maximization in verbal politeness , 1989 .

[9]  P. Prieto The Intonational Phonology of Catalan , 2008 .

[10]  K. Scherer Vocal affect expression: a review and a model for future research. , 1986, Psychological bulletin.

[11]  Charles Goodwin,et al.  Multi-Modality in Girls' Game Disputes , 2002 .

[12]  Mariapaola D'Imperio,et al.  Strategies for Intonation Labelling across Varieties of Italian , 2010 .

[13]  J. Rees-Miller,et al.  Compliments revisited: Contemporary compliments and gender , 2011 .

[14]  J. Hillenbrand,et al.  Acoustic correlates of breathy vocal quality: dysphonic voices and continuous speech. , 1996, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[15]  Amalia Arvaniti,et al.  On the place of phrase accents in intonational phonology , 2000, Phonology.

[16]  Pilar Prieto,et al.  Cost of the action and social distance affect the selection of question intonation in Catalan , 2016 .

[17]  Hsin-Yi Lin,et al.  An acoustic study on the paralinguistic prosody in the Politeness talk in Taiwan Mandarin , 2019, ExLing.

[18]  J. Ohala,et al.  An Ethological Perspective on Common Cross-Language Utilization of F₀ of Voice , 1984, Phonetica.

[19]  Theo van Leeuwen,et al.  Discourse and practice : new tools for critical discourse analysis , 2008 .

[20]  Carlos Gussenhoven,et al.  Intonation and interpretation: phonetics and phonology , 2002, Speech Prosody 2002.

[21]  Stefanie Alexa Stadler,et al.  Multimodal (im)politeness: the verbal, prosodic and non-verbal realization of disagreement in German and New Zealand English , 2006 .

[22]  Penelope Brown,et al.  Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage , 1989 .

[23]  A. D. Dominicis,et al.  Intonation Systems: A Survey of Twenty Languages , 1999 .

[24]  Aoju Chen,et al.  Universal and language-specific effects in the perception of question intonation , 2000, INTERSPEECH.

[25]  G. Kasper,et al.  Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies , 1991 .

[26]  Klaus R. Scherer,et al.  Vocal communication of emotion , 2000 .

[27]  Ryan Bennett Prosodic typology II : the phonology of intonation and phrasing , 2015 .

[28]  B. Fraser Perspectives on politeness , 1990 .

[29]  Lluís Payrató,et al.  The pragmatics of Catalan , 2011 .

[30]  Sven Grawunder,et al.  The phonetic profile of Korean formal and informal speech registers , 2012, J. Phonetics.

[31]  María Ruíz Santabalbina Duración y percepción de la cortesía en español: (Experimento piloto) , 2013 .

[32]  Sven Grawunder,et al.  Politeness, culture, and speaking task – paralinguistic prosodic behavior of speakers from Austria and Germany , 2014 .

[33]  J. Hillenbrand,et al.  Acoustic correlates of breathy vocal quality. , 1994, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[34]  Leonor Orozco,et al.  Peticiones corteses y factores prosódicos , 2008 .

[35]  S. Ide Formal forms and discernment: two neglected aspects of universals of linguistic politeness , 1989 .

[36]  Aoju Chen,et al.  Language-specific Uses of the Effort Code , 2002 .

[37]  Carlos Gussenhoven,et al.  Foundations of Intonational Meaning: Anatomical and Physiological Factors , 2016, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[38]  J. Holmes MODIFYING ILLOCUTIONARY FORCE , 1984 .

[39]  Annie Rialland Question prosody : an African perspective , 2007 .

[40]  K. Scherer,et al.  Vocal expression and communication of emotion. , 1993 .

[41]  J. César Félix-Brasdefer,et al.  Indirectness and Politeness in Mexican Requests , 2005 .

[42]  M. González Politeness: some universals in language usage , 1995 .

[43]  J. Laver The phonetic description of voice quality , 1980 .

[44]  Carmen Maíz-Arévalo,et al.  “Was that a compliment?” Implicit compliments in English and Spanish , 2012 .

[45]  A. Botinis,et al.  Intonation , 2001, Speech Commun..

[46]  Frank Anshen,et al.  Statistics for linguists , 1980 .

[47]  Kristine Billmyer,et al.  Investigating instrument-based pragmatic variability: effects of enhancing discourse completion tests , 2000 .

[48]  R. Watts,et al.  Relevance and relational work: linguistic politeness as politic behavior , 1989 .

[49]  Aoju Chen,et al.  Language-Specificity in the Perception of Paralinguistic Intonational Meaning , 2004, Language and speech.

[50]  C. Gussenhoven The phonology of tone and intonation , 2004 .

[51]  Etsuko Ofuka,et al.  Prosodic cues for rated politeness in Japanese speech , 2000, Speech Commun..

[52]  Carlos Gussenhoven,et al.  The Lexical Tone Contrast of Roermond Dutch in Optimality Theory , 2000 .

[53]  Rahul Shrivastav,et al.  Objective measures of breathy voice quality obtained using an auditory model. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[54]  Paul Boersma,et al.  Praat: doing phonetics by computer , 2003 .

[55]  Janet Fletcher,et al.  Interpreting rising intonation in Australian English , 2010, Speech Prosody 2010.

[56]  Pilar Prieto,et al.  Vocative Intonation Preferences are Sensitive to Politeness Factors , 2015, Language and speech.

[57]  Jonathan Culpeper Impoliteness and Entertainment in the Television Quiz Show: The Weakest Link , 2005 .

[58]  Empar Devís Herraiz,et al.  The intonation of mitigating politeness in Catalan , 2014 .

[59]  Bodo Winter,et al.  Phonetics and politeness: Perceiving Korean honorific and non-honorific speech through phonetic cues , 2014 .

[60]  Jonathan Culpeper,et al.  Impoliteness revisited: with special reference to dynamic and prosodic aspects. , 2003 .