Sexual dimorphism in auditory mechanics: tympanal vibrations of Cicada orni

SUMMARY In cicadas, the tympanum is anatomically intricate and employs complex vibrations as a mechanism for auditory frequency analysis. Using microscanning laser Doppler vibrometry, the tympanal mechanics of Cicada orni can be characterized in controlled acoustical conditions. The tympanum of C. orni moves following a simple drum-like motion, rather than the travelling wave found in a previous study of Cicadatra atra. There is a clear sexual dimorphism in the tympanal mechanics. The large male tympanum is unexpectedly insensitive to the dominant frequency of its own calling song, possibly a reflection of its dual purpose as a sound emitter and receiver. The small female tympanum appears to be mechanically sensitive to the dominant frequency of the male calling song and to high-frequency sound, a capacity never suspected before in these insects. This sexual dimorphism probably results from a set of selective pressures acting in divergent directions, which are linked to the different role of the sexes in sound reception and production. These discoveries serve to indicate that there is far more to be learnt about the development of the cicada ear, its biomechanics and evolution, and the cicada's acoustic behaviour.

[1]  ACOUSTICS OF SOUND PRODUCTION AND OF HEARING IN THE BLADDER CICADA CYSTOSOMA SAUNDERSII (WESTWOOD) , 1978 .

[2]  D. Robert,et al.  Mechanics of a `simple' ear: tympanal vibrations in noctuid moths , 2007, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[3]  A. Surlykke,et al.  Hearing and bat defence in geometrid winter moths , 1997, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[4]  Thierry Aubin,et al.  SEEWAVE, A FREE MODULAR TOOL FOR SOUND ANALYSIS AND SYNTHESIS , 2008 .

[5]  D. D. Yager Sexual dimorphism of auditory function and structure in praying mantises (Mantodea; Dictyoptera) , 1990 .

[6]  Can spectral cues contribute to species separation in closely related grasshoppers? , 1997, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[7]  W. Bailey Insect duets: underlying mechanisms and their evolution , 2003 .

[8]  J. A. Quartau,et al.  Calling Song Structure and Geographic Variation in Cicada orni Linnaeus (Hemiptera: Cicadidae) , 2005 .

[9]  J. Yack The structure and function of auditory chordotonal organs in insects , 2004, Microscopy research and technique.

[10]  Martin C Göpfert,et al.  Novel schemes for hearing and orientation in insects , 2002, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[11]  N. Fletcher,et al.  Acoustic systems in biology , 1992 .

[12]  D. Blumstein Acoustic Communication in Insects and Anurans : Common Problems and Diverse Solutions , 2002 .

[13]  H. C. Bennet-Clark,et al.  A MODEL OF THE MECHANISM OF SOUND PRODUCTION IN CICADAS , 1992 .

[14]  A. Surlykke,et al.  Ultrasonic courtship song in the Asian corn borer moth, Ostrinia furnacalis , 2006, Naturwissenschaften.

[15]  D D Yager,et al.  Structure, development, and evolution of insect auditory systems , 1999, Microscopy research and technique.

[16]  J. Sueur,et al.  Is microhabitat segregation between two cicada species (Tibicina haematodes and Cicada orni) due to calling song propagation constraints? , 2003, Naturwissenschaften.

[17]  K. G. Hill,et al.  Structure and function of the auditory system of the cicada,Cystosoma saundersii , 2004, Journal of comparative physiology.

[18]  P. Fonseca,et al.  Song discrimination by male cicadas Cicada barbara lusitanica (Homoptera, Cicadidae). , 2002, The Journal of experimental biology.

[19]  K. Michel Das Tympanalorgan vonCicada orni L. (Cicadina, Homoptera): Eine licht- und elektronenmikroskopische Untersuchung , 1975 .

[20]  R. Hoy,et al.  The cyclopean ear: a new sense for the praying mantis. , 1986, Science.

[21]  H. Wells,et al.  The praying mantids. , 1999 .

[22]  A. V. Popov,et al.  Directionality of the tympanal vibrations in a cicada: a biophysical analysis , 1997, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[23]  J. Fullard,et al.  Ultrasonic hearing in nocturnal butterflies , 2000, Nature.

[24]  D. Robert,et al.  Tympanal hearing in insects. , 1996, Annual review of entomology.

[25]  Skals,et al.  Sound production by abdominal tymbal organs in two moth species: the green silver-line and the scarce silver-line (Noctuoidea: Nolidae: Chloephorinae). , 1999, The Journal of experimental biology.

[26]  J. Fullard,et al.  Auditory characteristics and sexual dimorphism in the gypsy moth , 1988 .

[27]  John M Ratcliffe,et al.  The adaptive function of tiger moth clicks against echolocating bats: an experimental and synthetic approach , 2005, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[28]  Daniel Robert,et al.  Tuning the drum: the mechanical basis for frequency discrimination in a Mediterranean cicada , 2006, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[29]  H. Hughes,et al.  Auditory Systems in Insects , 2009 .

[30]  Ant. Dugès Traité de physiologie comparée de l'homme et des animaux , 1838 .

[31]  Andrew C Mason,et al.  Generation of extreme ultrasonics in rainforest katydids , 2006, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[32]  Bennet-Clark,et al.  The role of the tymbal in cicada sound production , 1995, The Journal of experimental biology.

[33]  K. Heller,et al.  Ultrasound-sensitive ears in a parasitoid fly , 1992, Naturwissenschaften.

[34]  D. Robert,et al.  The tympanal hearing organ of the parasitoid fly Ormia ochracea (Diptera, Tachinidae, Ormiini) , 2004, Cell and Tissue Research.

[35]  Jerry D. Gibson,et al.  Digital coding of waveforms: Principles and applications to speech and video , 1985, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[36]  J. Schul,et al.  Listening for males and bats: spectral processing in the hearing organ of Neoconocephalus bivocatus (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae) , 2007, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[37]  Hennig,et al.  AUDITORY THRESHOLD CHANGE IN SINGING CICADAS , 1994, The Journal of experimental biology.

[38]  P. Fonseca,et al.  Directional hearing of a cicada: biophysical aspects , 1993, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[39]  H. Römer,et al.  Sexual differences in auditory sensitivity: mismatch of hearing threshold and call frequency in a tettigoniid (orthoptera, tettigoniidae: Zaprochilinae) , 1991, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[40]  W. Bailey,et al.  Ultrasound hearing and male–male communication in Australian katydids (Tettigoniidae: Zaprochilinae) with sexually dimorphic ears , 1998 .

[41]  A. V. Popov,et al.  Sound radiation in a cicada: the role of different structures , 1994, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[42]  David C. Young,et al.  Do Cicadas Radiate Sound through their Ear-Drums? , 1990 .

[43]  D. Robert,et al.  7 Auditory Systems in Insects , 2007 .

[44]  H. C. Bennet-Clark,et al.  WHICH QS TO CHOOSE: QUESTIONS OF QUALITY IN BIOACOUSTICS? , 1999 .

[45]  J. Pringle,et al.  A Physiological Analysis of Cicada Song , 1954 .