Incorporating Social Impact on New Product Adoption in Choice Modeling: A Case Study in Green Vehicles

While discrete choice analysis is prevalent in capturing consumer preferences and describing their choice behaviors in product design, the traditional choice modeling approach assumes that each individual makes independent decisions, without considering the social impact. However, empirical studies show that choice is social – influenced by many factors beyond engineering performance of a product and consumer attributes. To alleviate this limitation, the authors propose a new choice modeling framework to capture the dynamic influence from social networks on consumer adoption of new products. By introducing social influence attributes into a choice utility function, social network simulation is integrated with the traditional discrete choice analysis in a three-stage process. The study shows the need for considering social impact in forecasting new product adoption. Using hybrid electric vehicles as an example, this work illustrates the procedure of social network construction, social influence evaluation, and choice model estimation based on data from the National Household Travel Survey. The study also demonstrates several interesting findings on the dynamic nature of new technology adoption and how social networks may influence hybrid electric vehicle adoption.

[1]  Daniel McFadden,et al.  Modelling the Choice of Residential Location , 1977 .

[2]  Jeremy J. Michalek,et al.  Balancing Marketing and Manufacturing Objectives in Product Line Design , 2006 .

[3]  Wei Chen,et al.  An Approach to Decision-Based Design With Discrete Choice Analysis for Demand Modeling , 2003 .

[4]  Grey Giddins,et al.  Statistics , 2016, The Journal of hand surgery, European volume.

[5]  Jonn Axsen,et al.  Interpersonal Influence Within Car Buyers’ Social Networks: Five Perspectives on Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicle Demonstration Participants , 2009 .

[6]  William A. Brock,et al.  Discrete Choice with Social Interactions , 2001 .

[7]  Eric J. Miller,et al.  Exploring the propensity to perform social activities: a social network approach , 2006 .

[8]  Greg M. Allenby,et al.  Modeling Interdependent Consumer Preferences , 2003 .

[9]  H. Li,et al.  Product Design Selection Under Uncertainty and With Competitive Advantage , 2000 .

[10]  Chris Arney,et al.  Networks, Crowds, and Markets: Reasoning about a Highly Connected World (Easley, D. and Kleinberg, J.; 2010) [Book Review] , 2013, IEEE Technology and Society Magazine.

[11]  Jonn Axsen,et al.  The Early U.S. Market for PHEVs: Anticipating Consumer Awareness, Recharge Potential, Design Priorities and Energy Impacts , 2008 .

[12]  E. David,et al.  Networks, Crowds, and Markets: Reasoning about a Highly Connected World , 2010 .

[13]  Gueorgi Kossinets,et al.  Empirical Analysis of an Evolving Social Network , 2006, Science.

[14]  A. Páez,et al.  A Discrete-Choice Approach to Modeling Social Influence on Individual Decision Making , 2008 .

[15]  Eric J Miller,et al.  Collecting Social Network Data to Study Social Activity-Travel Behavior: An Egocentric Approach , 2008 .

[16]  John M. Rose,et al.  Applied Choice Analysis: A Primer , 2005 .

[17]  P. K. Kannan,et al.  Engineering Product Design Optimization for Retail Channel Acceptance , 2008, Design Automation Conference.

[18]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[19]  Noah E. Friedkin,et al.  A Structural Theory of Social Influence: List of Tables and Figures , 1998 .

[20]  Scott Ferguson,et al.  Exploring Differences in Preference Heterogeneity Representation and Their Influence in Product Family Design , 2011, DAC 2011.

[21]  Lin He Usage and Social Context-based Choice Modeling for Engineering Design , 2012 .

[22]  Bernard Yannou,et al.  Choice Modeling for Usage Context-Based Design , 2012 .

[23]  W. Brock,et al.  A Multinomial-Choice Model of Neighborhood Effects , 2002 .

[24]  F. Bass A new product growth model for consumer durables , 1976 .

[25]  Joan L. Walker,et al.  Correcting for endogeneity in behavioral choice models with social influence variables , 2011 .

[26]  T. Snijders The statistical evaluation of social network dynamics , 2001 .

[27]  Jeremy J. Michalek,et al.  Impact of Battery Weight and Charging Patterns on the Economic and Environmental Benefits of Plug-in Hybrid Vehicles , 2009 .

[28]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[29]  Frank M. Bass,et al.  A New Product Growth for Model Consumer Durables , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[30]  J. Sterman,et al.  Transition challenges for alternative fuel vehicle and transportation systems , 2006 .

[31]  Panos Y. Papalambros,et al.  On the Suitability of Econometric Demand Models in Design for Market Systems , 2010 .

[32]  Wei Chen,et al.  Understanding and modelling heterogeneity of human preferences for engineering design , 2011 .

[33]  Jeremy J. Michalek,et al.  Optimal Product Design Under Price Competition , 2009, DAC 2008.

[34]  Daniel McFadden,et al.  Sociality, Rationality, and the Ecology of Choice , 2009 .

[35]  Joan L. Walker,et al.  Discrete choice with social and spatial network interdependencies: An empirical example using mixed generalized extreme value models with field and panel effects , 2005 .

[36]  Vithala R. Rao,et al.  How Peer Influence Affects Attribute Preferences: A Bayesian Updating Mechanism , 2010, Mark. Sci..

[37]  Panos Y. Papalambros,et al.  Preference Inconsistency in Multidisciplinary Design Decision Making , 2007, DAC 2007.

[38]  Martino Tran,et al.  Agent-behaviour and network influence on energy innovation diffusion , 2012 .

[39]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Six Degrees: The Science of a Connected Age , 2003 .

[40]  U. Netlogo Wilensky,et al.  Center for Connected Learning and Computer-Based Modeling , 1999 .

[41]  I T Salmeen,et al.  PHEV marketplace penetration: An agent based simulation , 2009 .

[42]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994, Structural analysis in the social sciences.

[43]  A. Case Neighborhood influence and technological change , 1992 .

[44]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994 .

[45]  Albert,et al.  Emergence of scaling in random networks , 1999, Science.

[46]  Lin He,et al.  Impact of vehicle usage on consumer choice of hybrid electric vehicles , 2012 .

[47]  L. Festinger A Theory of Social Comparison Processes , 1954 .

[48]  William Rand,et al.  Evolving viral marketing strategies , 2010, GECCO '10.