Enhancing Distribution System Resiliency through a Novel Transactive Energy Systems Framework

Restoration of end-use loads during bulk transmission system outages is a key challenge for electric utilities. During those outages, utilities often do not have enough resources to fully restore the end-use loads. System reconfiguration can provide access to non-utility assets that can enable restoration; however, not all available switching options are feasible due to voltage and load limits. Engaging non-utility assets for system restoration during system events requires commensurate compensation and incentive calculation. This paper presents a new transactive energy system framework (TESF) to incentivize distributed energy resources (DERs) to provide reactive power for supporting the self-healing functions of distribution management system (DMS). TESF engages non-utility DERs during resiliency events by incentivizing them through transactive signals computed using marginal cost of producing reactive power and marginal benefit of additional switching operations. TESF calculates additional switching options, which DMS then leverages to identify new optimal switching plans to restore additional loads. A test system consisting of multiple IEEE-13 node distribution feeders is used to demonstrate the performance of the proposed method. For the given system configuration and use-case, TESF results in 24.82% additional load restoration and one additional switching operation.

[1]  Mani Vadari,et al.  Electric System Operations: Evolving to the Modern Grid , 2012 .

[2]  Jianming Lian,et al.  Transactive Systems Simulation and Valuation Platform Trial Analysis , 2017 .

[3]  Abhishek Somani,et al.  Transactive Approach for Engaging Distribution Network Assets for Voltage Management in Southern California Edison Distribution Feeders , 2018 .

[4]  Henry H. Willis,et al.  Measuring the Resilience of Energy Distribution Systems , 2015 .

[5]  W. H. Kersting,et al.  Radial distribution test feeders , 1991, 2001 IEEE Power Engineering Society Winter Meeting. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.01CH37194).

[6]  Mohammad Shahidehpour,et al.  Microgrids for Enhancing the Power Grid Resilience in Extreme Conditions , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[7]  Wei Zhang,et al.  Transactive System: Part I: Theoretical Underpinnings of Payoff Functions, Control Decisions, Information Privacy, and Solution Concepts , 2018 .

[8]  Ramon Zamora,et al.  Real-Time Implementation of Intelligent Reconfiguration Algorithm for Microgrid , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy.

[9]  Di Wu,et al.  Transactive System: Part II: Analysis of Two Pilot Transactive Systems using Foundational Theory and Metrics , 2018 .

[10]  Jeffrey D. Taft,et al.  Architectural Basis for Highly Distributed Transactive Power Grids: Frameworks, Networks, and Grid Codes , 2016 .

[11]  T. E. McDermott,et al.  Analytic Considerations and Design Basis for the IEEE Distribution Test Feeders , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[12]  Chan-Nan Lu,et al.  Evaluation of AMI and SCADA Data Synergy for Distribution Feeder Modeling , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[13]  Jianhui Wang,et al.  Self-Healing Resilient Distribution Systems Based on Sectionalization Into Microgrids , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.