Modulation of locomotor activity in complete spinal cord injury

The aim of this study was to evaluate the modulation of muscle activity during locomotor-like movements by different walking speeds in subjects with a motor complete spinal cord injury (SCI) compared to actively- and passively-walking control subjects without neurological deficit. Stepping movements on a treadmill were induced and assisted by a driven gait orthosis. Electromyographic (EMG) muscle activity of one leg (rectus and biceps femoris, tibialis anterior and gastrocnemius) was recorded and analyzed at three stepping velocities with similar body weight support in both subject groups. In SCI subjects, the EMG amplitude of biceps femoris, tibialis anterior and gastrocnemius was in general similar or weaker than in passively- and actively-stepping control subjects, but that of rectus femoris was larger. The degree of co-activation between tibialis anterior and gastrocnemius was higher in SCI than in control subjects. A significant velocity-dependent EMG modulation was present in all four-leg muscles in both subject groups. In SCI subjects, this EMG modulation was similar to that in actively stepping control subjects. It is concluded that in complete spastic SCI subjects, spinal neuronal circuits underlying locomotion can to a large extent adequately respond to a change in external drive to adapt the neuronal pattern to a new locomotion speed. The application of various speeds might enhance the effect of locomotor training in incomplete SCI subjects.

[1]  S. Grillner Neurobiological bases of rhythmic motor acts in vertebrates. , 1985, Science.

[2]  V. Dietz,et al.  Locomotor activity in spinal man: significance of afferent input from joint and load receptors. , 2002, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[3]  A. Prochazka,et al.  Control of locomotor cycle durations. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  J. Hidler,et al.  Alterations in muscle activation patterns during robotic-assisted walking. , 2005, Clinical biomechanics.

[5]  R. Firth Function , 1955, Yearbook of Anthropology.

[6]  B. Dobkin,et al.  Modulation of locomotor-like EMG activity in subjects with complete and incomplete spinal cord injury. , 1995, Journal of neurologic rehabilitation.

[7]  S. Harkema,et al.  Locomotor activity in spinal cord-injured persons. , 2004, Journal of applied physiology.

[8]  W. Donovan,et al.  The International Standards Booklet for Neurological and Functional Classification of Spinal Cord Injury , 1994, Paraplegia.

[9]  M. Dimitrijevic,et al.  Initiating extension of the lower limbs in subjects with complete spinal cord injury by epidural lumbar cord stimulation , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[10]  V. Dietz,et al.  Treadmill training of paraplegic patients using a robotic orthosis. , 2000, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[11]  S. Rossignol,et al.  Contribution of cutaneous inputs from the hindpaw to the control of locomotion. I. Intact cats. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  V. Edgerton,et al.  Afferent input modulates neurotrophins and synaptic plasticity in the spinal cord. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  G Colombo,et al.  Locomotor pattern in paraplegic patients: training effects and recovery of spinal cord function , 1998, Spinal Cord.

[14]  B. Dobkin,et al.  Human lumbosacral spinal cord interprets loading during stepping. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  Carlo J. De Luca,et al.  The Use of Surface Electromyography in Biomechanics , 1997 .

[16]  S. Rossignol,et al.  The effects of clonidine and yohimbine on locomotion and cutaneous reflexes in the adult chronic spinal cat , 1987, Brain Research.

[17]  R. Waters,et al.  International Standards for Neurological and Functional Classification of Spinal Cord Injury , 1997, Spinal Cord.

[18]  Susan J Harkema,et al.  The human spinal cord interprets velocity-dependent afferent input during stepping. , 2004, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[19]  V. Dietz,et al.  Degradation of neuronal function following a spinal cord injury: mechanisms and countermeasures. , 2004, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[20]  V. Dietz,et al.  Driven gait orthosis for improvement of locomotor training in paraplegic patients , 2001, Spinal Cord.

[21]  J. Mehrholz,et al.  Speed-Dependent Treadmill Training in Ambulatory Hemiparetic Stroke Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial , 2002, Stroke.

[22]  V. Dietz,et al.  Locomotor capacity of spinal cord in paraplegic patients , 1995, Annals of neurology.

[23]  S. Rossignol,et al.  Enhancement of locomotor recovery following spinal cord injury. , 1994, Current opinion in neurology.

[24]  V R Edgerton,et al.  Retention of hindlimb stepping ability in adult spinal cats after the cessation of step training. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[25]  Richard W. Bohannon,et al.  Interrater reliability of a modified Ashworth scale of muscle spasticity. , 1987, Physical therapy.

[26]  G Colombo,et al.  Locomotor capacity and recovery of spinal cord function in paraplegic patients: a clinical and electrophysiological evaluation. , 1998, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[27]  V. Edgerton,et al.  Plasticity of the spinal neural circuitry after injury. , 2004, Annual review of neuroscience.