A Preliminary Study to Reduce the Missing Wedge Effect by Using a Noise Robust Mojette Reconstruction

Apart from the usual methods based on the Radon theorem, the Mojette transform proposes a specific algorithm called Corner Based Inversion (CBI) to reconstruct an image from its projections. Contrary to other transforms, it offers two interesting properties. First, the acquisition follows discrete image geometry and resolves the well-known irregular sampling problem. Second, it updates projection values during the reconstruction such that the sinogram contains only data for not yet reconstructed pixels. These properties could be a solution to reduce the missing wedge effect in tomography. Unfortunately, the CBI algorithm is noise sensitive and reconstruction from corrupted data fails. In this paper, we first develop and optimize a noise-robust CBI algorithm based on data redundancy and noise modelling in the projections. Afterwards, this algorithm is applied in discrete tomography from a specific Radon acquisition. Reconstructed image results are discussed and applications and perspectives to reduce the missing wedge effect are also developed.

[1]  Michael Unser,et al.  B-spline signal processing. I. Theory , 1993, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[2]  Ming Jiang,et al.  Convergence of the simultaneous algebraic reconstruction technique (SART) , 2003, Conference Record of Thirty-Fifth Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers (Cat.No.01CH37256).

[3]  Jean-Pierre V. Guédon,et al.  The Mojette transform: Discrete angles for tomography , 2005, Electron. Notes Discret. Math..

[4]  P. Midgley,et al.  Reducing the missing wedge: High-resolution dual axis tomography of inorganic materials. , 2006, Ultramicroscopy.

[5]  B. F. Logan,et al.  The Fourier reconstruction of a head section , 1974 .

[6]  Richard Gordon,et al.  Questions of uniqueness and resolution in reconstruction from projection , 1978 .

[7]  Pascal Desbarats,et al.  Radon and Mojette Projections' Equivalence for Tomographic Reconstruction using Linear Systems , 2008 .

[8]  C.A. Bouman,et al.  Quantitative comparison of FBP, EM, and Bayesian reconstruction algorithms for the IndyPET scanner , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[9]  Jean-Pierre V. Guédon,et al.  Spline Mojette transform. Applications in tomography and communications , 2002, 2002 11th European Signal Processing Conference.

[10]  Jean-Pierre V. Guédon,et al.  The Mojette Transform: The First Ten Years , 2005, DGCI.

[11]  H Guan,et al.  Computed tomography using algebraic reconstruction techniques (ARTs) with different projection access schemes: a comparison study under practical situations , 1996, Physics in medicine and biology.

[12]  P. Toft The Radon Transform - Theory and Implementation , 1996 .

[13]  Akram Aldroubi,et al.  B-spline signal processing. II. Efficiency design and applications , 1993, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[14]  Linda Kaufman,et al.  Implementing and Accelerating the EM Algorithm for Positron Emission Tomography , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[15]  Pascal Desbarats,et al.  Mojette reconstruction from noisy projections , 2010, 2010 2nd International Conference on Image Processing Theory, Tools and Applications.

[16]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[17]  Jean-Pierre Guédon The Mojette Transform: Theory and Applications , 2009 .

[18]  Akram Aldroubi,et al.  B-SPLINE SIGNAL PROCESSING: PART I-THEORY , 1993 .

[19]  R. Gordon A tutorial on art (algebraic reconstruction techniques) , 1974 .

[20]  L. Shepp,et al.  Maximum Likelihood Reconstruction for Emission Tomography , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[21]  Akram Aldroubi,et al.  B-SPLINE SIGNAL PROCESSING: PART II-EFFICIENT DESIGN AND APPLICATIONS , 1993 .