Abstract This paper illustrates an approach to the study of the seismic soil–structure interaction that was developed at the verification stage of the design of the Messina Strait Bridge in order to validate its seismic behaviour. It consisted of a series of two-dimensional, plane strain numerical analyses on models that included, in addition to the embedded foundation elements, a simplified structural description of the bridge towers: simplified structural models were specifically designed to reproduce the first vibrations modes of the towers, that were deemed to have the most significant influence on the system's dynamic response. Non-linear dynamic analyses were carried out in the time domain, studying the effects of two different natural records, each characterised by three orthogonal components of the soil motion. In the first part of the paper, essential information is provided about the foundations layout, the main properties of the foundation soil resulting from the in situ and laboratory investigation, and the assessment of the liquefaction potential. Then, the numerical models are discussed in some detail, with an emphasis on the modelling of the soil and of the structural elements. For sake of conciseness, details are provided only for one of the two shores. The results obtained with the present approach shed some light on the complex coupling between the soil's and the structure's behaviour, evidencing the significant role that the embedded, massive foundations of the bridge play in the dynamic response of the system. The computed time-histories of the displacements of the foundation elements are used to assess the seismic performance of the bridge.
[1]
J. Bielak,et al.
Domain Reduction Method for Three-Dimensional Earthquake Modeling in Localized Regions, Part I: Theory
,
2003
.
[2]
M. Nuray Aydınoğlu.
Consistent formulation of direct and substructure methods in nonlinear soil-structure interaction
,
1993
.
[3]
J. Lysmer,et al.
Finite Dynamic Model for Infinite Media
,
1969
.
[4]
Eduardo Kausel,et al.
Early history of soil–structure interaction
,
2010
.
[5]
Misko Cubrinovski,et al.
EMPIRICAL CORRELATION BETWEEN SPT N-VALUE AND RELATIVE DENSITY FOR SANDY SOILS
,
1999
.
[6]
W. B. Joyner,et al.
Calculation of nonlinear ground response in earthquakes
,
1975
.
[7]
P. B. Schnabel.
SHAKE-A Computer Program for Earthquake Response Analysis of Horizontally Layered Sites
,
1970
.
[8]
Luigi Callisto,et al.
Seismic Design of Flexible Cantilevered Retaining Walls
,
2010
.
[9]
Jonathan P. Stewart,et al.
EQUIVALENT NUMBER OF UNIFORM STRESS CYCLES FOR SOIL LIQUEFACTION ANALYSIS
,
2001
.
[10]
M. Bolton.
THE STRENGTH AND DILATANCY OF SANDS
,
1986
.
[11]
Ezio Faccioli,et al.
The Messina Strait Bridge: A Challenge and a Dream
,
2009
.
[12]
Vincenzo Fioravante,et al.
Triaxial tests on undisturbed gravelly soils from the Sicilian shore of the Messina Strait
,
2012,
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.
[13]
Gonzalo Castro,et al.
Liquefaction and Cyclic Mobility of Saturated Sands
,
1975
.