Effect of Dapagliflozin, Compared With Placebo, According to Baseline Risk in DAPA-HF.
暂无分享,去创建一个
P. Ponikowski | S. Solomon | J. McMurray | M. Sabatine | P. Jhund | L. Køber | D. Lindholm | S. Inzucchi | K. Docherty | M. Kosiborod | F. Martinez | J. Simpson | M. Sjöstrand | A. Langkilde | O. Bengtsson
[1] C. Papadopoulos,et al. Risk scores and prediction models in chronic heart failure: a systematic review. , 2020, Current pharmaceutical design.
[2] Akshay S. Desai,et al. Prognostic Models Derived in PARADIGM-HF and Validated in ATMOSPHERE and the Swedish Heart Failure Registry to Predict Mortality and Morbidity in Chronic Heart Failure. , 2020, JAMA cardiology.
[3] G. D. Di Tanna,et al. Evaluating risk prediction models for adults with heart failure: A systematic literature review , 2020, PloS one.
[4] P. Ponikowski,et al. Baseline features of the VICTORIA (Vericiguat Global Study in Subjects with Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction) trial , 2019, European journal of heart failure.
[5] Akshay S. Desai,et al. Dapagliflozin in Patients with Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction. , 2019, The New England journal of medicine.
[6] D. DeMets,et al. The Dapagliflozin And Prevention of Adverse‐outcomes in Heart Failure (DAPA‐HF) trial: baseline characteristics , 2019, European journal of heart failure.
[7] Akshay S. Desai,et al. A trial to evaluate the effect of the sodium–glucose co‐transporter 2 inhibitor dapagliflozin on morbidity and mortality in patients with heart failure and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (DAPA‐HF) , 2019, European journal of heart failure.
[8] J. H. Patterson,et al. Characteristics and Treatments of Patients Enrolled in the CHAMP‐HF Registry Compared With Patients Enrolled in the PARADIGM‐HF Trial , 2018, Journal of the American Heart Association.
[9] A. Passantino,et al. Critical Appraisal of Multivariable Prognostic Scores in Heart Failure: Development, Validation and Clinical Utility. , 2018, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.
[10] Akshay S. Desai,et al. Comparing LCZ696 with enalapril according to baseline risk using the MAGGIC and EMPHASIS-HF risk scores: an analysis of mortality and morbidity in PARADIGM-HF. , 2015, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[11] A. Gavazzi,et al. Prognostic scores in heart failure - Critical appraisal and practical use. , 2015, International journal of cardiology.
[12] Mark Woodward,et al. Risk prediction in patients with heart failure: a systematic review and analysis. , 2014, JACC. Heart failure.
[13] L. Lund,et al. Predicting survival in heart failure: validation of the MAGGIC heart failure risk score in 51 043 patients from the Swedish Heart Failure Registry , 2014, European journal of heart failure.
[14] J. McMurray,et al. The impact of eplerenone at different levels of risk in patients with systolic heart failure and mild symptoms: insight from a novel risk score for prognosis derived from the EMPHASIS-HF trial. , 2013, European heart journal.
[15] Karl Swedberg,et al. Predicting survival in heart failure: a risk score based on 39 372 patients from 30 studies. , 2013, European heart journal.
[16] L. Tavazzi,et al. Predictors of Mortality in 6975 Patients With Chronic Heart Failure in the Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Streptochinasi nell'Infarto Miocardico-Heart Failure Trial: Proposal for a Nomogram , 2013, Circulation. Heart failure.
[17] John G F Cleland,et al. Predictors of fatal and non‐fatal outcomes in the Controlled Rosuvastatin Multinational Trial in Heart Failure (CORONA): incremental value of apolipoprotein A‐1, high‐sensitivity C‐reactive peptide and N‐terminal pro B‐type natriuretic peptide , 2009, European journal of heart failure.
[18] Salim Yusuf,et al. Predictors of mortality and morbidity in patients with chronic heart failure. , 2006, European heart journal.