Domain Modeling for Adaptive Training and Education in Support of the US Army Learning Model-Research Outline

Abstract : While human tutoring and mentoring are common teaching tools, current US Army standards for training and education are group instruction and classroom training, also known as ???one-to-many??? instruction. Recently, the US Army has placed significant emphasis on self-regulated learning \201SRL\202 methods to augment institutional training where Soldiers will be largely responsible for managing their own learning. In support of the US Army Learning Model \201ALM\202 and to provide affordable, tailored SRL training and educational capabilities for the US Army, the US Army Research Laboratory \201ARL\202 is investigating and developing adaptive tools and methods to largely automate the authoring \201creation\202, delivery of instruction, and evaluation of computer-regulated training and education capabilities. A major goal within this research program is to reduce the time and skill required to author, deliver, and evaluate adaptive technologies to make them usable by a larger segment of the training and educational community. This research includes 6 interdependent research vectors: individual learner and unit modeling, instructional management principles, domain modeling, authoring tools and methods, and evaluation tools and methods. This report \2011 of 6 interdependent research outlines\202 focuses on domain modeling research for adaptive training and education with the goal of guiding learning in militarily relevant training and educational domains.

[1]  Ela Hunt,et al.  A cognitive approach to the teaching of physics , 1994 .

[2]  Chen-Lin C. Kulik,et al.  Educational Outcomes of Tutoring: A Meta-analysis of Findings , 1982 .

[3]  Andreas Holzinger,et al.  Efficiency in Learning: Evidence-Based Guidelines to Manage Cognitive Load , 2007, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[4]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  MetaTutor: Analyzing Self-Regulated Learning in a Tutoring System for Biology , 2009, AIED.

[5]  Benjamin S. Bloom,et al.  A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives , 2000 .

[6]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Instruction Based on Tutoring , 2010 .

[7]  Bertrand Schneider,et al.  Preparing for Future Learning with a Tangible User Interface: The Case of Neuroscience , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies.

[8]  Albert T. Corbett,et al.  The Knowledge-Learning-Instruction Framework: Bridging the Science-Practice Chasm to Enhance Robust Student Learning , 2012, Cogn. Sci..

[9]  Robert A. Sottilare,et al.  The Generalized Intelligent Framework for Tutoring (GIFT) , 2012 .

[10]  Harold F. O'Neil,et al.  Technology Applications in Education: A Learning View , 2002 .

[11]  B. Bloom The 2 Sigma Problem: The Search for Methods of Group Instruction as Effective as One-to-One Tutoring , 1984 .

[12]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Self-Regulated Learning in Learning Environments With Pedagogical Agents That Interact in Natural Language , 2010 .

[13]  Volker C. Franke Decision-Making under Uncertainty: Using Case Studies for Teaching Strategy in Complex Environments , 2011 .

[14]  Robert A. Sottilare,et al.  Considerations in the Development of an Ontology for a Generalized Intelligent Framework for Tutoring , 2012 .

[15]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Operation ARIES!: A Serious Game for Teaching Scientific Inquiry , 2011, Serious Games and Edutainment Applications.

[16]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Emotions During the Learning of Difficult Material , 2012 .

[17]  Annette Kluge,et al.  Enhancing Research on Training for Cognitive Readiness , 2013 .

[18]  Lawrence Freedman,et al.  Head strong: : how psychology is revolutionizing war , 2014 .

[19]  Benjamin Goldberg,et al.  C HAPTER 13 ‒ Modeling Student Competencies in Video Games Using Stealth Assessment , 2013 .

[20]  David W. Johnson Circles of learning: Cooperation in the classroom , 1986 .

[21]  Robert A. Sottilare,et al.  Challenges and Emerging Concepts in the Development of Adaptive, Computer-based Tutoring Systems for Team Training , 2011 .

[22]  Robert A. Sottilare,et al.  Recommendations for Modern Tools to Author Tutoring Systems , 2012 .

[23]  Robert A. Sottilare,et al.  Characterizing an Adaptive Tutoring Learning Effect Chain for Individual and Team Tutoring , 2013 .

[24]  J. D. Fletcher,et al.  Opportunities for New “Smart” Learning Environments Enabled by Next-Generation Web Capabilities , 2004 .

[25]  Benjamin S. Bloom,et al.  Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. , 1957 .

[26]  Robert A. Sottilare,et al.  Injecting Realistic Human Models into the Optical Display of A Future Land Warrior System for Embedded Training Purposes , 2007 .

[27]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Guru: A Computer Tutor That Models Expert Human Tutors , 2012, ITS.

[28]  J. T. Dillon Questioning and Teaching: A Manual of Practice , 1988 .

[29]  K. VanLehn The Relative Effectiveness of Human Tutoring, Intelligent Tutoring Systems, and Other Tutoring Systems , 2011 .

[30]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  When Are Tutorial Dialogues More Effective Than Reading? , 2007, Cogn. Sci..

[31]  Albert T. Corbett,et al.  Cognitive Tutor: Applied research in mathematics education , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[32]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Serious Games, and the Generalized Intelligent Framework for Tutoring (GIFT) , 2016 .

[33]  E. Salas,et al.  Team cognition : understanding the factors that drive process and performance , 2004 .

[34]  William B. Rouse,et al.  The role of mental models in team performance in complex systems , 1992, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[35]  Eduardo Salas,et al.  Situation Awareness in Team Performance: Implications for Measurement and Training , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[36]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Artificial Intelligence in Education - Building Learning Systems that Care: From Knowledge Representation to Affective Modelling, Volume 200 Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications , 2009 .

[37]  Heather H. Mitchell,et al.  AutoTutor: A tutor with dialogue in natural language , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[38]  Robert A. Sottilare,et al.  Challenges in Moving Adaptive Training & Education from State-of-Art to State-of-Practice , 2015, AIED Workshops.

[39]  R. Mayer,et al.  Handbook of Research on Learning and Instruction , 2011 .

[40]  Peter Brusilovsky Domain Modeling for Personalized Guidance , 2016 .

[41]  Kurt VanLehn,et al.  The Andes Physics Tutoring System: Lessons Learned , 2005, Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ..

[42]  Robert A. Sottilare,et al.  Adaptive Intelligent Tutoring System (ITS) Research in Support of the Army Learning Model—Research Outline , 2013 .

[43]  William R. Penuel,et al.  Effectiveness of Reading and Mathematics Software Products: Findings from the First Student Cohort , 2007 .

[44]  Tom Murray,et al.  An Overview of Intelligent Tutoring System Authoring Tools: Updated Analysis of the State of the Art , 2003 .

[45]  S. D’Mello A selective meta-analysis on the relative incidence of discrete affective states during learning with technology , 2013 .

[46]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Cognitive Tutors: Lessons Learned , 1995 .

[47]  Tom Murray,et al.  Authoring Intelligent Tutoring Systems: An analysis of the state of the art , 1999 .

[48]  R. Pekrun The Control-Value Theory of Achievement Emotions: Assumptions, Corollaries, and Implications for Educational Research and Practice , 2006 .

[49]  R. Atkinson,et al.  Transitioning From Studying Examples to Solving Problems: Effects of Self-Explanation Prompts and Fading Worked-Out Steps. , 2003 .

[50]  Keith K. Millis,et al.  Operation ARA: A computerized learning game that teaches critical thinking and scientific reasoning , 2012 .

[51]  H. Cooper,et al.  A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of intelligent tutoring systems on K–12 students’ mathematical learning. , 2013 .

[52]  Tom Routen,et al.  Intelligent Tutoring Systems , 1996, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[53]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  AutoTutor and affective autotutor: Learning by talking with cognitively and emotionally intelligent computers that talk back , 2012, TIIS.

[54]  H. Cooper,et al.  A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of intelligent tutoring systems on college students' academic learning , 2014 .

[55]  P. Winne,et al.  Feedback and Self-Regulated Learning: A Theoretical Synthesis , 1995 .

[56]  Susanne P. Lajoie,et al.  Sherlock: A Coached Practice Environment for an Electronics Troubleshooting Job. , 1988 .

[57]  J. Stanley,et al.  Book Review: Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, The Classification of Educational Goals, Handbook I: Cognitive Domain , 1957 .

[58]  Robert A. Sottilare,et al.  Automated scenario generation: toward tailored and optimized military training in virtual environments , 2012, FDG.

[59]  Amy Soller,et al.  Supporting Social Interaction in an Intelligent Collaborative Learning System , 2001 .

[60]  Richard W. Morshead Taxonomy of Educational Objectives Handbook II: Affective Domain , 1965 .