Stakeholder management in complex product systems: Practices and rationales for engagement and disengagement

Abstract Collaboration with stakeholders has become a cornerstone of contemporary business; however, absolute collaboration is not trouble-free. The present study explores how and why firms engage and disengage external stakeholders in their value-creating activities in complex product systems over time. From the existing research on stakeholder management, we know that actor roles, strategies, reasons and challenges of engaging external stakeholders in innovation and business activities vary across contexts. However, additional research is needed to construct a more comprehensive understanding of the practices as well as their rationales by which firms engage or disengage external stakeholders in complex product systems. Our empirical study of a European district development megaproject improves the current understanding of stakeholder management in complex product systems contexts. We derive nine practices and four rationales that timely describe the engagement and disengagement of external stakeholders. The study develops a processual model of stakeholder management in complex product systems with implications for both stakeholder management literature and managerial practice.

[1]  Alan W. Mackelprang,et al.  The Relationship Between Strategic Supply Chain Integration and Performance: A Meta‐Analytic Evaluation and Implications for Supply Chain Management Research , 2014 .

[2]  Julian Birkinshaw,et al.  The Role of External Involvement in the Creation of Management Innovations , 2014 .

[3]  Jaakko Kujala,et al.  Stakeholder Dynamics during the Project Front-End: The Case of Nuclear Waste Repository Projects , 2015 .

[4]  P. Eskerod,et al.  Stakeholder Inclusiveness: Enriching Project Management with General Stakeholder Theory1 , 2015 .

[5]  Thomas Y. Choi,et al.  Renaissance of case research as a scientific method , 2014 .

[6]  Regina C. McNally,et al.  Structural social capital evolution and knowledge transfer: Evidence from an Irish pharmaceutical network , 2014 .

[7]  Ronald K. Mitchell,et al.  Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of who and What Really Counts , 1997 .

[8]  Y. Fassin,et al.  Faculteit Economie En Bedrijfskunde Tweekerkenstraat 2 B-9000 Gent the Stakeholder Model Refined , 2022 .

[9]  T. Jick.  Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Triangulation in Action. , 1979 .

[10]  Jeff Frooman.  Stakeholder Influence Strategies , 1999 .

[11]  Stéphanie Missonier,et al.  Stakeholder analysis and engagement in projects: From stakeholder relational perspective to stakeholder relational ontology , 2014 .

[12]  Tim Rowley,et al.  When Will Stakeholder Groups Act? An Interest- and Identity-Based Model of Stakeholder Group Mobilization , 2003 .

[13]  Giselle Rampersad,et al.  Managing innovation networks: Exploratory evidence from ICT, biotechnology and nanotechnology networks , 2010 .

[14]  Timothy W. Nix,et al.  Strategies for assessing and managing organizational stakeholders , 1991 .

[15]  Vicki R. Lane,et al.  A Stakeholder Approach to Organizational Identity , 2000 .

[16]  J. C. Flanagan.  Psychological Bulletin THE CRITICAL INCIDENT TECHNIQUE , 2022 .

[17]  Simone de Colle,et al.  Stakeholder Theory: The State of the Art , 2010 .

[18]  N. Denzin,et al.  Handbook of Qualitative Research , 1994 .

[19]  L. Preston,et al.  The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications , 1995 .

[20]  R. Rajala,et al.  Organizational and institutional barriers to value-based pricing in industrial relationships , 2015 .

[21]  Kirsi Aaltonen,et al.  Response strategies to stakeholder pressures in global projects , 2009 .

[22]  Sylvie Lacoste.  Sustainable value co-creation in business networks , 2016 .

[23]  A. Lievens,et al.  Leveraging value in multi-stakeholder innovation networks: A process framework for value co-creation and capture , 2016 .

[24]  E. Jaakkola,et al.  How to manage innovation processes in extensive networks: A longitudinal study , 2017 .

[25]  Ann Højbjerg Clarke,et al.  Knowledge sharing in heterogeneous teams through collaboration and cooperation: Exemplified through Public–Private-Innovation partnerships , 2014 .

[26]  Stefan Olander,et al.  Evaluation of stakeholder influence in the implementation of construction projects , 2005 .

[27]  B. Flyvbjerg.  What you Should Know about Megaprojects and Why: An Overview , 2014, 1409.0003.

[28]  Michael Hobday,et al.  Innovation in complex products and system , 2000 .

[29]  J. Kujala,et al.  Towards an improved understanding of project stakeholder landscapes , 2016 .

[30]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  Service, value networks and learning , 2010 .

[31]  Bernard Cova,et al.  Six key points to merge project marketing into project management , 2005 .

[32]  P. Biernacki,et al.  Snowball Sampling: Problems and Techniques of Chain Referral Sampling , 1981 .

[33]  J. Kujala,et al.  A project lifecycle perspective on stakeholder influence strategies in global projects , 2010 .

[34]  W. Scott,et al.  Institutional exceptions on global projects: a process model , 2008 .

[35]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Theory Building From Cases: Opportunities And Challenges , 2007 .

[36]  Nuno Gil,et al.  Strategic Capabilities for Megaproject Architects: Sequencing Network Growth and Bottleneck Removal , 2016 .

[37]  V. Braun,et al.  Using thematic analysis in psychology , 2006 .

[38]  T. Ritvala,et al.  Network mobilizers and target firms: The case of saving the Baltic Sea , 2011 .

[39]  Jennifer D. Chandler,et al.  Systemic principles of value co-creation: Synergetics of value and service ecosystems , 2016 .