Carbon cycle uncertainty in the Alaskan Arctic

Climate change is leading to a disproportionately large warming in the high northern latitudes, but the magnitude and sign of the future carbon balance of the Arctic are highly uncertain. Using 40 terrestrial biosphere models for the Alaskan Arctic from four recent model intercomparison projects - NACP (North American Carbon Program) site and regional syntheses, TRENDY (Trends in net land atmosphere carbon exchanges), and WETCHIMP (Wetland and Wetland CH4 Inter-comparison of Models Project) - we provide a baseline of terrestrial carbon cycle uncertainty, defined as the multi-model standard deviation (sigma) for each quantity that follows. Mean annual absolute uncertainty was largest for soil carbon (14.0+/-9.2 kgCm(-2)), then gross primary production (GPP) (0.22+/-0.50 kgCm(-2) yr(-1)), ecosystem respiration (Re) (0.23+/-0.38 kgCm(-2) yr(-1)), net primary production (NPP) (0.14+/-0.33 kgCm(-2) yr(-1)), autotrophic respiration (Ra) (0.09+/-0.20 kgCm(-2) yr(-1)), heterotrophic respiration (Rh) (0.14+/-0.20 kgCm(-2) yr(-1)), net ecosystem exchange (NEE) (-0.01+/-0.19 kgCm(-2) yr(-1)), and CH4 flux (2.52+/-4.02 g CH4 m(-2) yr(-1)). There were no consistent spatial patterns in the larger Alaskan Arctic and boreal regional carbon stocks and fluxes, with some models showing NEE for Alaska as a strong carbon sink, others as a strong carbon source, while still others as carbon neutral. Finally, AmeriFlux data are used at two sites in the Alaskan Arctic to evaluate the regional patterns; observed seasonal NEE was captured within multi-model uncertainty. This assessment of carbon cycle uncertainties may be used as a baseline for the improvement of experimental and modeling activities, as well as a reference for future trajectories in carbon cycling with climate change in the Alaskan Arctic and larger boreal region.

[1]  H. Tian,et al.  North American terrestrial CO2 uptake largely offset by CH4 and N2O emissions: toward a full accounting of the greenhouse gas budget , 2014, Climatic Change.

[2]  George Burba,et al.  Annual patterns and budget of CO2 flux in an Arctic tussock tundra ecosystem , 2014 .

[3]  S. Natali,et al.  Permafrost degradation stimulates carbon loss from experimentally warmed tundra. , 2014, Ecology.

[4]  Atul K. Jain,et al.  Overview of the large-scale biosphere–atmosphere experiment in Amazonia data model intercomparison project (LBA-DMIP) , 2013 .

[5]  B. Bolker,et al.  Tundra ecosystems observed to be CO2 sources due to differential amplification of the carbon cycle. , 2013, Ecology letters.

[6]  M. Lomas,et al.  Evaluation of terrestrial carbon cycle models for their response to climate variability and to CO2 trends , 2013, Global change biology.

[7]  Joshua P. Schimel,et al.  Long-term warming restructures Arctic tundra without changing net soil carbon storage , 2013, Nature.

[8]  V. Brovkin,et al.  Expert assessment of vulnerability of permafrost carbon to climate change , 2013, Climatic Change.

[9]  P. Cox,et al.  Sensitivity of tropical carbon to climate change constrained by carbon dioxide variability , 2013, Nature.

[10]  P. Crill,et al.  Environmental and physical controls on northern terrestrial methane emissions across permafrost zones , 2013, Global Change Biology.

[11]  Catherine Prigent,et al.  Present state of global wetland extent and wetland methane modelling: methodology of a model inter-comparison project (WETCHIMP) , 2012 .

[12]  C. Jones,et al.  Uncertainties in the global temperature change caused by carbon release from permafrost thawing , 2012 .

[13]  W. Riley,et al.  Alaskan soil carbon stocks: spatial variability and dependence on environmental factors , 2012 .

[14]  Atul K. Jain,et al.  A model-data comparison of gross primary productivity: Results from the North American Carbon Program site synthesis , 2012 .

[15]  Benjamin Poulter,et al.  Present state of global wetland extent and wetland methane modelling: conclusions from a model inter-comparison project (WETCHIMP) , 2012 .

[16]  J. Canadell,et al.  The Northern Circumpolar Soil Carbon Database: spatially distributed datasets of soil coverage and soil carbon storage in the northern permafrost regions , 2012 .

[17]  Atul K. Jain,et al.  North American Carbon Program (NACP) regional interim synthesis: Terrestrial biospheric model intercomparison , 2012 .

[18]  Yaxing Wei,et al.  Reconciling estimates of the contemporary North American carbon balance among terrestrial biosphere models, atmospheric inversions, and a new approach for estimating net ecosystem exchange from inventory‐based data , 2012 .

[19]  C. Miller,et al.  CARVE: The Carbon in Arctic Reservoirs Vulnerability Experiment , 2012, 2012 IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[20]  Susan M. Natali,et al.  Increased plant productivity in Alaskan tundra as a result of experimental warming of soil and permafrost , 2012 .

[21]  B. Bolker,et al.  Incorporating spatial heterogeneity created by permafrost thaw into a landscape carbon estimate , 2012 .

[22]  W. Oechel,et al.  An assessment of the carbon balance of Arctic tundra: comparisons among observations, process models, and atmospheric inversions , 2011 .

[23]  Edward A. G. Schuur,et al.  Climate change: High risk of permafrost thaw , 2011, Nature.

[24]  Kristofer Johnson,et al.  Soil carbon distribution in Alaska in relation to soil-forming factors , 2011 .

[25]  P. Cox,et al.  The Joint UK Land Environment Simulator (JULES), model description – Part 2: Carbon fluxes and vegetation dynamics , 2011 .

[26]  A. McGuire,et al.  Is the northern high‐latitude land‐based CO2 sink weakening? , 2011 .

[27]  P. Cox,et al.  The Joint UK Land Environment Simulator (JULES), model description – Part 1: Energy and water fluxes , 2011 .

[28]  P. Ciais,et al.  Permafrost carbon-climate feedbacks accelerate global warming , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[29]  Niklaus E. Zimmermann,et al.  Impacts of land cover and climate data selection on understanding terrestrial carbon dynamics and the CO 2 airborne fraction , 2011 .

[30]  P. Ciais,et al.  Controls on winter ecosystem respiration in temperate and boreal ecosystems , 2011, Biogeosciences.

[31]  W. J. Riley,et al.  Barriers to predicting changes in global terrestrial methane fluxes: analyses using CLM4Me, a methane biogeochemistry model integrated in CESM , 2011 .

[32]  S. Schubert,et al.  MERRA: NASA’s Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications , 2011 .

[33]  Philippe Bousquet,et al.  Constraining global methane emissions and uptake by ecosystems , 2011 .

[34]  S. Goetz,et al.  Scoping Completed for an Experiment to Assess Vulnerability of Arctic and Boreal Ecosystems , 2011 .

[35]  L. Hinzman,et al.  Planning the Next Generation of Arctic Ecosystem Experiments , 2011 .

[36]  S. Seneviratne,et al.  Evaluation of global observations‐based evapotranspiration datasets and IPCC AR4 simulations , 2011 .

[37]  K. Schaefer,et al.  Amount and timing of permafrost carbon release in response to climate warming , 2011 .

[38]  I. Prentice,et al.  Implementation and evaluation of a new methane model within a dynamic global vegetation model: LPJ-WHyMe v1.3.1 , 2010 .

[39]  Vineet Yadav,et al.  A geostatistical synthesis study of factors affecting gross primary productivity in various ecosystems of North America , 2010 .

[40]  Vineet Yadav,et al.  Attributing the variability of eddy‐covariance CO2 flux measurements across temporal scales using geostatistical regression for a mixed northern hardwood forest , 2010 .

[41]  T. A. Black,et al.  A model‐data intercomparison of CO2 exchange across North America: Results from the North American Carbon Program site synthesis , 2010 .

[42]  Glenn E. Shaw,et al.  The Arctic Research of the Composition of the Troposphere from Aircraft and Satellites (ARCTAS) mission: design, execution, and first results , 2010 .

[43]  W. Landman.  Climate change 2007: the physical science basis , 2010 .

[44]  Ge Sun,et al.  Model estimates of net primary productivity, evapotranspiration, and water use efficiency in the terrestrial ecosystems of the southern United States during 1895–2007 , 2010 .

[45]  Pierre Friedlingstein,et al.  Carbon and nitrogen cycle dynamics in the O‐CN land surface model: 2. Role of the nitrogen cycle in the historical terrestrial carbon balance , 2010 .

[46]  N. Zeng,et al.  Enhanced terrestrial carbon uptake in the Northern High Latitudes in the 21st century from the Coupled Carbon Cycle Climate Model Intercomparison Project model projections , 2010 .

[47]  Deborah A. Agarwal,et al.  A data‐centered collaboration portal to support global carbon‐flux analysis , 2009, Concurr. Comput. Pract. Exp..

[48]  T. A. Black,et al.  Interannual variation in net ecosystem productivity of Canadian forests as affected by regional weather patterns - a Fluxnet-Canada synthesis. , 2009 .

[49]  R. Macdonald,et al.  Sensitivity of the carbon cycle in the Arctic to climate change , 2009 .

[50]  Donatella Zona,et al.  Characterization of the carbon fluxes of a vegetated drained lake basin chronosequence on the Alaskan Arctic Coastal Plain , 2009 .

[51]  Peter E. Thornton,et al.  Systematic assessment of terrestrial biogeochemistry in coupled climate–carbon models , 2009 .

[52]  J. Canadell,et al.  Soil organic carbon pools in the northern circumpolar permafrost region , 2009 .

[53]  T. E. Osterkamp,et al.  The effect of permafrost thaw on old carbon release and net carbon exchange from tundra , 2009, Nature.

[54]  E. Schuur,et al.  Report from the International Permafrost Association: carbon pools in permafrost regions , 2009 .

[55]  Howard E. Epstein,et al.  High stocks of soil organic carbon in the North American Arctic region , 2008 .

[56]  A. Scott Denning,et al.  Combined Simple Biosphere/Carnegie‐Ames‐Stanford Approach terrestrial carbon cycle model , 2008 .

[57]  Yiqi Luo,et al.  Soil hydrological properties regulate grassland ecosystem responses to multifactor global change: A modeling analysis , 2008 .

[58]  S. Hagemann,et al.  Vulnerability of Permafrost Carbon to Climate Change: Implications for the Global Carbon Cycle , 2008 .

[59]  Benjamin Smith,et al.  Representation of vegetation dynamics in the modelling of terrestrial ecosystems: comparing two contrasting approaches within European climate space , 2008 .

[60]  Scott D. Miller,et al.  Seasonal drought stress in the Amazon: Reconciling models and observations , 2008 .

[61]  D. Baldocchi.  ‘Breathing’ of the terrestrial biosphere: lessons learned from a global network of carbon dioxide flux measurement systems , 2008 .

[62]  Peter E. Thornton,et al.  Influence of carbon‐nitrogen cycle coupling on land model response to CO2 fertilization and climate variability , 2007 .

[63]  John E. Walsh,et al.  Simulations of Arctic Temperature and Pressure by Global Coupled Models , 2007 .

[64]  T. A. Black,et al.  Soil-plant nitrogen cycling modulated carbon exchanges in a western temperate conifer forest in Canada , 2006 .

[65]  John E. Walsh,et al.  Integrated regional changes in arctic climate feedbacks: Implications for the global climate system , 2006 .

[66]  Charles Tarnocai,et al.  The effect of climate change on carbon in Canadian peatlands , 2006 .

[67]  Rommel C. Zulueta,et al.  Effects of climate variability on carbon sequestration among adjacent wet sedge tundra and moist tussock tundra ecosystems , 2006 .

[68]  F. Chapin,et al.  Permafrost and the Global Carbon Budget , 2006, Science.

[69]  R. Schnur,et al.  Climate-carbon cycle feedback analysis: Results from the C , 2006 .

[70]  Haifeng Qian,et al.  Impact of 1998–2002 midlatitude drought and warming on terrestrial ecosystem and the global carbon cycle , 2005 .

[71]  F. Chapin,et al.  Role of Land-Surface Changes in Arctic Summer Warming , 2005, Science.

[72]  Atul K. Jain,et al.  Modeling the effects of two different land cover change data sets on the carbon stocks of plants and soils in concert with CO2 and climate change , 2005 .

[73]  Maosheng Zhao,et al.  Improvements of the MODIS terrestrial gross and net primary production global data set , 2005 .

[74]  I. C. Prentice,et al.  A dynamic global vegetation model for studies of the coupled atmosphere‐biosphere system , 2005 .

[75]  F. Chapin,et al.  Evidence and Implications of Recent Climate Change in Northern Alaska and Other Arctic Regions , 2004 .

[76]  F. Chapin,et al.  Ecosystem carbon storage in arctic tundra reduced by long-term nutrient fertilization , 2004, Nature.

[77]  Andrew D. Friend,et al.  Modelling the impact of future changes in climate, CO2 concentration and land use on natural ecosystems and the terrestrial carbon sink , 2004 .

[78]  Bo H. Svensson,et al.  Thawing sub‐arctic permafrost: Effects on vegetation and methane emissions , 2004 .

[79]  J. Randerson,et al.  Continental-Scale Partitioning of Fire Emissions During the 1997 to 2001 El Niño/La Niña Period , 2003, Science.

[80]  D. Mortensen,et al.  Arctic tundra: A source or sink for atmospheric carbon dioxide in a changing environment? , 1982, Oecologia.

[81]  I. C. Prentice,et al.  Evaluation of ecosystem dynamics, plant geography and terrestrial carbon cycling in the LPJ dynamic global vegetation model , 2003 .

[82]  T. A. Black,et al.  Sensitivity tests of the integrated biosphere simulator to soil and vegetation characteristics in a pacific coastal coniferous forest , 2002 .

[83]  John E. Walsh,et al.  Comparison of Arctic Climate Simulations by Uncoupled and Coupled Global Models , 2002 .

[84]  F. Woodward,et al.  Global response of terrestrial ecosystem structure and function to CO2 and climate change: results from six dynamic global vegetation models , 2001 .

[85]  W. Oechel,et al.  Acclimation of ecosystem CO2 exchange in the Alaskan Arctic in response to decadal climate warming , 2000, Nature.

[86]  W. Oechel,et al.  Observational Evidence of Recent Change in the Northern High-Latitude Environment , 2000 .

[87]  Jing M. Chen,et al.  Daily canopy photosynthesis model through temporal and spatial scaling for remote sensing applications , 1999 .

[88]  Darrel L. Williams,et al.  BOREAS in 1997: Experiment overview, scientific results, and future directions , 1997 .

[89]  Christopher B. Field,et al.  The contribution of terrestrial sources and sinks to trends in the seasonal cycle of atmospheric carbon dioxide , 1997 .

[90]  Konrad A Hughen,et al.  Arctic Environmental Change of the Last Four Centuries , 1997 .

[91]  W. Oechel,et al.  Cold season CO2 emission from Arctic soils , 1997 .

[92]  K. Jon Ranson,et al.  The Boreal Ecosystem-Atmosphere Study (BOREAS) : an overview and early results from the 1994 field year , 1995 .

[93]  W. Oechel,et al.  The effects of climate charge on land-atmosphere feedbacks in arctic tundra regions. , 1994, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[94]  W. Oechel,et al.  Mid- to late-Holocene carbon balance in Arctic Alaska and its implications for future global warming , 1993 .

[95]  Walter C. Oechel,et al.  Recent change of Arctic tundra ecosystems from a net carbon dioxide sink to a source , 1993, Nature.

[96]  John E. Walsh,et al.  Recent Variations of Sea Ice and Air Temperature in High Latitudes , 1993 .

[97]  C. Field,et al.  A reanalysis using improved leaf models and a new canopy integration scheme , 1992 .

[98]  Paul B. Kebabian,et al.  The Arctic Boundary Layer Expedition (ABLE 3A): July–August 1988 , 1992 .

[99]  K. Taylor,et al.  Interpretation of Snow-Climate Feedback as Produced by 17 General Circulation Models , 1991, Science.

[100]  Piers J. Sellers,et al.  A Simplified Biosphere Model for Global Climate Studies , 1991 .

[101]  S S I T C H,et al.  Evaluation of Ecosystem Dynamics, Plant Geography and Terrestrial Carbon Cycling in the Lpj Dynamic Global Vegetation Model , 2022 .