Reconstructing a Pregnancy Cohort to Examine Potential Selection Bias in Studies on Racial Disparities in Preterm Delivery.

BACKGROUND Epidemiologic studies examining preconception risk factors on perinatal outcomes are typically restricted to livebirths. By including only non-terminated pregnancies, estimates for the underlying pregnancy cohort may be subject to selection bias. We examined if potential selection bias due to induced termination by maternal race may result in different estimates of the non-Hispanic black - non-Hispanic white risk ratio (RR) for preterm delivery (PTD) among a reconstructed pregnancy cohort ('pseudo-pregnancy cohort'). METHODS Using New York City registries of 1.6 million livebirths, spontaneous terminations, and induced terminations among non-Hispanic black and non-Hispanic white women (2000-12), we multiply imputed PTD (<37 weeks) and early PTD (<32 weeks) outcomes for induced terminations based on maternal race, age, parity, marital status, nativity, and medical care payer to construct the pseudo-pregnancy cohort. RESULTS Among non-Hispanic black and non-Hispanic white women, 55% and 19% of pregnancies ended in induced termination and 13% and 8% resulted in PTD, respectively. Although several factors were associated with both PTD and induced termination, PTD RRs in the birth (RR 1.64, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.62, 1.66) and pseudo-pregnancy (RR 1.63, 95% CI 1.56, 1.71) cohorts were similar. However, early PTD RR was somewhat larger in the birth (RR 2.80, 95% CI 2.71, 2.89) than pseudo-pregnancy (RR 2.47, 95% CI 2.23, 2.73) cohort. CONCLUSIONS Using birth certificate data - thereby excluding induced terminations - to estimate the PTD racial disparity did not produce biased estimates. Our data suggest observed PTD disparities likely are not artefacts of selection bias due to induced termination.

[1]  P. Allison,et al.  Missing data , 2005, European Radiology.

[2]  J. Martin,et al.  Births: Final Data for 2017. , 2018, National vital statistics reports : from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics, National Vital Statistics System.

[3]  K. Joseph,et al.  Left Truncation Bias as a Potential Explanation for the Protective Effect of Smoking on Preeclampsia , 2015, Epidemiology.

[4]  J. Potter,et al.  Change in abortion services after implementation of a restrictive law in Texas. , 2014, Contraception.

[5]  Rachel K. Jones,et al.  Denial of abortion because of provider gestational age limits in the United States. , 2014, American journal of public health.

[6]  Rachel K. Jones,et al.  Secondary Measures of Access to Abortion Services in the United States, 2011 and 2012: Gestational Age Limits, Cost, and Harassment , 2014, Women's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health.

[7]  Ann M. Madsen,et al.  Evaluating New York City's abortion reporting system: insights for public health data collection systems. , 2014, Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP.

[8]  N. Pearce,et al.  Commentary: Three worlds collide: Berkson's bias, selection bias and collider bias. , 2014, International journal of epidemiology.

[9]  M. Kramer,et al.  Analyzing risks of adverse pregnancy outcomes. , 2014, American journal of epidemiology.

[10]  S. Cole,et al.  Accuracy loss due to selection bias in cohort studies with left truncation. , 2013, Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology.

[11]  D. Baird,et al.  Risk of miscarriage among black women and white women in a U.S. Prospective Cohort Study. , 2013, American journal of epidemiology.

[12]  S. Ventura,et al.  Estimated pregnancy rates and rates of pregnancy outcomes for the United States, 1990-2008. , 2012, National vital statistics reports : from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics, National Vital Statistics System.

[13]  Stef van Buuren,et al.  MICE: Multivariate Imputation by Chained Equations in R , 2011 .

[14]  Roberto Romero,et al.  Epidemiology and causes of preterm birth , 2008, The Lancet.

[15]  I. Hertz-Picciotto,et al.  Conditions for bias from differential left truncation. , 2006, American journal of epidemiology.

[16]  J. Robins,et al.  A Structural Approach to Selection Bias , 2004, Epidemiology.

[17]  Changzhong Chen,et al.  Conception, early pregnancy loss, and time to clinical pregnancy: a population-based prospective study. , 2003, Fertility and sterility.

[18]  J. Schafer,et al.  Missing data: our view of the state of the art. , 2002, Psychological methods.

[19]  R. Cooper,et al.  Commentary: considerations for use of racial/ethnic classification in etiologic research. , 2001, American journal of epidemiology.

[20]  Michael J. Moore,et al.  The Effects of Short-Term Variation in Abortion Funding on Pregnancy Outcomes , 1996, Journal of health economics.

[21]  T. Joyce,et al.  The Dynamic Relationship between Low Birthweight and Induced Abortion in New York City: An Aggregate Time-Series Analysis , 1989, Journal of health economics.

[22]  Clarice R. Weinberg,et al.  Incidence of early loss of pregnancy. , 1988, The New England journal of medicine.

[23]  T. Joyce The impact of induced abortion on black and white birth outcomes in the United States , 1987, Demography.

[24]  Atividade Física,et al.  American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists , 1979, Journal of the American Dietetic Association.

[25]  K. Boulding,et al.  THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS , 2017 .

[26]  Lena Osterhagen,et al.  Multiple Imputation For Nonresponse In Surveys , 2016 .

[27]  D. Westreich Berkson's bias, selection bias, and missing data. , 2012, Epidemiology.

[28]  Assuring Healthy Outcomes,et al.  Prematurity at Birth: Determinants, Consequences, and Geographic Variation , 2007 .

[29]  Assuring Healthy Outcomes,et al.  Preterm Birth : Causes , Consequences , and Prevention , 2005 .