Non-nutritive sucking evaluation in preterm newborns and the start of oral feeding: a multicenter study

OBJECTIVES: The assessment of early sucking by preterm infants provides information on the ability of these infants to efficiently and safely receive nutrients via an oral route (oral feeding). To analyze the application and reliability of an instrument in assessing non-nutritive sucking that indicates a capacity for oral feeding in the routine care of different neonatal units. METHODS: A multicenter, prospective cohort study was conducted in seven neonatal units. A non-nutritive sucking assessment with a formulary validated by Neiva et al (2008) (variables evaluated: rooting reaction; easy initiation of sucking; labial sealing; tongue central groove; peristaltic tongue movements; jaw raising and lowering movements; labial, tongue and jaw coordination; sucking strength; sucking rhythm; bites; excessive jaw excursion; stress signals) was applied to 199 pre-term newborns, who had a chronological age ≥ 2 days and were clinically stable. These infants were divided into two groups based on their corrected gestational age at the first assessment, as follows: Group I-infants with a gestational age ≤ 33 weeks and Group II-infants with a gestational age between 34 and 36 6/7 weeks. RESULTS: The mean gestational age was 31.66±2 weeks, and the mean birth weight was 1494 ± 373 g. The mean scores on the non-nutritive sucking assessment were 46 ± 25 in Group I and 49 ± 24 in Group II. The beginning of oral feeding was successful in 43 (67.2%) infants in Group I and 64 (81%) infants in Group II (p = 0.089). CONCLUSION: The method identified preterm infants who were able to feed orally based on 33 points in the non-nutritive sucking assessment and a corrected gestational age of 32 weeks or more. The corrected gestational age was the most important factor in predicting the success of oral feeding.

[1]  Michael Greatorex,et al.  Statistical Package for the Social Sciences , 2015 .

[2]  M. M. Palmer Identification and management of the transitional suck pattern in premature infants. , 1993, The Journal of perinatal & neonatal nursing.

[3]  P. Gartside,et al.  A feeding protocol for healthy preterm infants that shortens time to oral feeding. , 2001, The Journal of pediatrics.

[4]  J. Himes,et al.  A United States National Reference for Fetal Growth , 1996, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[5]  R. Schanler,et al.  Early introduction of oral feeding in preterm infants. , 2002, Pediatrics.

[6]  C. Lau,et al.  Characterization of the developmental stages of sucking in preterm infants during bottle feeding , 2000, Acta paediatrica.

[7]  M. Keske-Soares,et al.  The oral motor capacity and feeding performance of preterm newborns at the time of transition to oral feeding. , 2008, Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologicas.

[8]  C. Schans,et al.  The reliability of the Neonatal Oral-Motor Assessment Scale. , 2008 .

[9]  Sérgio Tadeu Martins Marba,et al.  O recém-nascido de muito baixo peso , 2004 .

[10]  T. Ashikaga,et al.  Prospective study of non-nutritive sucking and feeding skills in premature infants , 2009, Archives of Disease in Childhood: Fetal and Neonatal Edition.

[11]  CR Leone,et al.  Non‐nutritive sucking scoring system for preterm newborns , 2008, Acta paediatrica.

[12]  J. T. Ferreira,et al.  Correlation between feeding methods, non-nutritive sucking and orofacial behaviors. , 2009, Pro-fono : revista de atualizacao cientifica.

[13]  M. A. Braun,et al.  A Pilot Study of Oral-Motor Dysfunction in “At-Risk” Infants , 1985 .