Performance evaluation of a foot-controlled human-robot interface

Robotic minimally invasive interventions typically require using more than two instruments. We thus developed a foot pedal interface which allows the user to control a robotic arm (simultaneously to working with the hands) with four degrees of freedom in continuous directions and speeds. This paper evaluates and compares the performances of ten naive operators in using this new pedal interface and a traditional button interface in completing tasks. These tasks are geometrically complex path-following tasks similar to those in laparoscopic training, and the traditional button interface allows axis-by-axis control with constant speeds. Precision, time, and smoothness of the subjects’ control movements for these tasks are analysed. The results demonstrate that the pedal interface can be used to control a robot for complex motion tasks. The subjects kept the average error rate at a low level of around 2.6% with both interfaces, but the pedal interface resulted in about 30% faster operation speed and 60% smoother movement, which indicates improved efficiency and user experience as compared with the button interface. The results of a questionnaire show that the operators found that controlling the robot with the pedal interface was more intuitive, comfortable, and less tiring than using the button interface.

[1]  Etienne Burdet,et al.  Control of a Supernumerary Robotic Hand by Foot: An Experimental Study in Virtual Reality , 2015, PloS one.

[2]  R. Polet,et al.  Using a laparoscope manipulator (LAPMAN) in laparoscopic gynecological surgery. , 2008, Surgical technology international.

[3]  G. Buess,et al.  A new remote-controlled endoscope positioning system for endoscopic solo surgery , 2000, Surgical Endoscopy.

[4]  Koji Kondo,et al.  Hanging foot switch for bipolar forceps: a device for surgeons operating in the standing position: technical note. , 2013, Neurologia medico-chirurgica.

[5]  Philippe Cinquin,et al.  ViKY Robotic Scope Holder: Initial Clinical Experience and Preliminary Results Using Instrument Tracking , 2010, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[6]  Christian Hansen,et al.  Foot Interaction Concepts to Support Radiological Interventions , 2017, Mensch & Computer.

[7]  Lin Cao,et al.  A Subject-Specific Four-Degree-of-Freedom Foot Interface to Control a Robot Arm , 2019, ArXiv.

[8]  Khek Yu Ho,et al.  Feasibility of performing esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection using master and slave transluminal endoscopic robot , 2017, Endoscopy.

[9]  Etienne Burdet,et al.  In a demanding task, three-handed manipulation is preferred to two-handed manipulation , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[10]  Blake Hannaford,et al.  Raven-II: An Open Platform for Surgical Robotics Research , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[11]  J. Bodner,et al.  First experiences with the da Vinci operating robot in thoracic surgery. , 2004, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[12]  J. M. Sackier,et al.  Robotically assisted laparoscopic surgery , 2008, Surgical Endoscopy.

[13]  Jie Wang,et al.  Calibrating human hand for teleoperating the HIT/DLR hand , 2004, IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2004. Proceedings. ICRA '04. 2004.

[14]  M P Schijven,et al.  Laparoscopic skills training using inexpensive box trainers: which exercises to choose when constructing a validated training course , 2011, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[15]  Etienne Burdet,et al.  A Robust and Sensitive Metric for Quantifying Movement Smoothness , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[16]  Alin Albu-Schäffer,et al.  The sigma.7 haptic interface for MiroSurge: A new bi-manual surgical console , 2011, 2011 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[17]  T. Hoogeboom,et al.  How to determine leg dominance: The agreement between self-reported and observed performance in healthy adults , 2017, PloS one.

[18]  Alireza Mirbagheri,et al.  Design and development of an effective low-cost robotic cameraman for laparoscopic surgery: RoboLens , 2011 .

[19]  M. Munro Automated laparoscope positioner: preliminary experience. , 1993, The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists.