Event-related potentials (ERPs) to schematic faces in adults and children.

Event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded from 4-year-old 8-10-year-old children and adults to a schematic face, inverted face and jumbled face. The subjects were instructed to fixate the stimuli and no other response was required. The schematic face and inverted face were shown with a frequency of 20% each and the remaining presentations (60%) were of the jumbled face. P1 and N170 peak latency were measurable in the children and adults. These peaks were at longer latencies in the children. P3 was measurable in the adults and 8-10-year-old children but not the 4-year-olds. The adults had larger and longer latency P1 and smaller amplitude N170 to the inverted face than the other faces. In contrast, the P1 was unaffected by inversion in the children and the N170 was not smaller to the inverted or jumbled face. It is concluded that this result reflects developmental differences in the processing of configuration, with the children relying on an under-specified configuration of the face.

[1]  Ray Johnson,et al.  Event-related brain potentials : basic issues and applications , 1990 .

[2]  Margot J. Taylor,et al.  ERP evidence of developmental changes in processing of faces , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[3]  J. Cerella,et al.  The rise and fall in information-processing rates over the life span. , 1994, Acta psychologica.

[4]  M. Tarr,et al.  The N170 occipito‐temporal component is delayed and enhanced to inverted faces but not to inverted objects: an electrophysiological account of face‐specific processes in the human brain , 2000, Neuroreport.

[5]  M J Taylor1,et al.  Top-down modulation of early selective attention processes in children. , 2000, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[6]  C. Erwin Event-related potentials: basic issues and applications , 1994 .

[7]  D. Maurer,et al.  Configural Face Processing Develops more Slowly than Featural Face Processing , 2002, Perception.

[8]  S. Carey,et al.  From piecemeal to configurational representation of faces. , 1977, Science.

[9]  T. Allison,et al.  Electrophysiological Studies of Face Perception in Humans , 1996, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[10]  A. Herbert,et al.  A 'passive' event-related potential? , 1998, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[11]  S. Carey Becoming a face expert. , 1992, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[12]  N. Sagiv,et al.  Structural Encoding of Human and Schematic Faces: Holistic and Part-Based Processes , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[13]  J. Eggermont On the rate of maturation of sensory evoked potentials. , 1988, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[14]  M. Baenninger The development of face recognition: featural or configurational processing? , 1994, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[15]  M. Eimer Event-related brain potentials distinguish processing stages involved in face perception and recognition , 2000, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[16]  S. Carey,et al.  Why faces are and are not special: an effect of expertise. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[17]  V. Goffaux,et al.  Spatio-temporal localization of the face inversion effect: an event-related potentials study , 1999, Biological Psychology.

[18]  P. Green Biology and Cognitive Development: the Case of Face Recognition, Mark H. Johnson, John Morton. Blackwell, Oxford (1991), x, +180. Price £35.00 hardback, £10.95 paperback , 1992 .

[19]  Mark H. Johnson,et al.  Modulation of event‐related potentials by prototypical and atypical faces , 2000, Neuroreport.

[20]  J. L. Kenemans,et al.  “Initial-” and “change-orienting reactions”: An analysis based on visual single-trial event-related potentials , 1989, Biological Psychology.

[21]  S. Carey,et al.  Are faces perceived as configurations more by adults than by children , 1994 .

[22]  Margot J. Taylor,et al.  Inversion and Contrast Polarity Reversal Affect both Encoding and Recognition Processes of Unfamiliar Faces: A Repetition Study Using ERPs , 2002, NeuroImage.

[23]  Taylor Mj,et al.  Developmental changes in early cognitive processes. , 1999 .

[24]  Olivier Pascalis,et al.  Specialization of Neural Mechanisms Underlying Face Recognition in Human Infants , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[25]  D. Thomson,et al.  Development of face recognition. , 1995, British journal of psychology.

[26]  M Eimer,et al.  Does the face‐specific N170 component reflect the activity of a specialized eye processor? , 1998, Neuroreport.

[27]  L. Deouell,et al.  STRUCTURAL ENCODING AND IDENTIFICATION IN FACE PROCESSING: ERP EVIDENCE FOR SEPARATE MECHANISMS , 2000, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[28]  Daphne L. McCulloch,et al.  Maturation of the pattern-reversal VEP in human infants: a theoretical framework , 1999, Vision Research.

[29]  J. Davidoff,et al.  Brain events related to normal and moderately scrambled faces. , 1996, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[30]  Margot J. Taylor,et al.  Eyes first! Eye processing develops before face processing in children , 2001, Neuroreport.

[31]  I. W. R. Bushneil,et al.  Neonatal recognition of the mother's face , 1989 .

[32]  M. Eimer The face‐specific N170 component reflects late stages in the structural encoding of faces , 2000, Neuroreport.

[33]  S. Shevell,et al.  Developmental changes in face processing: results from multidimensional scaling. , 1985, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[34]  C. C. Goren,et al.  Visual following and pattern discrimination of face-like stimuli by newborn infants. , 1975, Pediatrics.

[35]  A. Kerr,et al.  Rett disorder and the developing brain , 2001 .

[36]  D. Maurer,et al.  Face Perception During Early Infancy , 1999 .

[37]  M. Verbaten,et al.  Different effects of uncertainty and complexity on single trial visual ERPs and the SCR-OR in non-signal conditions. , 1986, Psychophysiology.

[38]  Margot J. Taylor,et al.  Is the face‐sensitive N170 the only ERP not affected by selective attention? , 2000, Neuroreport.