In vivo degradation of three-dimensional silk fibroin scaffolds.

Three-dimensional porous scaffolds prepared from regenerated silk fibroin using either an all-aqueous process or a process involving an organic solvent, hexafluoroisopropanol (HFIP), have shown promise in cell culture and tissue engineering applications. However, their biocompatibility and in vivo degradation have not been fully established. The present study was conducted to systematically investigate how processing method (aqueous vs. organic solvent) and processing variables (silk fibroin concentration and pore size) affect the short-term (up to 2 months) and long-term (up to 1 year) in vivo behavior of the protein scaffolds in both nude and Lewis rats. The samples were analyzed by histology for scaffold morphological changes and tissue ingrowth, and by real-time RT-PCR and immunohistochemistry for immune responses. Throughout the period of implantation, all scaffolds were well tolerated by the host animals and immune responses to the implants were mild. Most scaffolds prepared from the all-aqueous process degraded to completion between 2 and 6 months, while those prepared from organic solvent (hexafluoroisopropanol (HFIP)) process persisted beyond 1 year. Due to widespread cellular invasion throughout the scaffold, the degradation of aqueous-derived scaffolds appears to be more homogeneous than that of HFIP-derived scaffolds. In general and especially for the HFIP-derived scaffolds, a higher original silk fibroin concentration (e.g. 17%) and smaller pore size (e.g. 100-200microm) resulted in lower levels of tissue ingrowth and slower degradation. These results demonstrate that the in vivo behavior of the three-dimensional silk fibroin scaffolds is related to the morphological and structural features that resulted from different scaffold preparation processes. The insights gained in this study can serve as a guide for processing scenarios to match desired morphological and structural features and degradation time with tissue-specific applications.

[1]  D. Kaplan,et al.  Cartilage tissue engineering with silk scaffolds and human articular chondrocytes. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[2]  Ung-Jin Kim,et al.  Three-dimensional aqueous-derived biomaterial scaffolds from silk fibroin. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[3]  G. Vunjak‐Novakovic,et al.  Stem cell-based tissue engineering with silk biomaterials. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[4]  David L. Kaplan,et al.  Water‐Stable Silk Films with Reduced β‐Sheet Content , 2005 .

[5]  P. Durdey,et al.  Assessment of Sutures for Use in Colonic Surgery: An Experimental Study , 1984, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[6]  Ralph Müller,et al.  Control of in vitro tissue-engineered bone-like structures using human mesenchymal stem cells and porous silk scaffolds. , 2007, Biomaterials.

[7]  David L Kaplan,et al.  Osteogenesis by human mesenchymal stem cells cultured on silk biomaterials: comparison of adenovirus mediated gene transfer and protein delivery of BMP-2. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[8]  Gordana Vunjak-Novakovic,et al.  Bone Tissue Engineering Using Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells: Effects of Scaffold Material and Medium Flow , 2004, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[9]  D. Kaplan,et al.  Processing windows for forming silk fibroin biomaterials into a 3D porous matrix , 2005 .

[10]  Cunxian Song,et al.  The in vivo degradation, absorption and excretion of PCL-based implant. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[11]  Fritz Vollrath,et al.  Liquid crystalline spinning of spider silk , 2001, Nature.

[12]  Ung-Jin Kim,et al.  In vitro cartilage tissue engineering with 3D porous aqueous-derived silk scaffolds and mesenchymal stem cells. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[13]  Fritz Vollrath,et al.  Spider Silk Proteins – Mechanical Property and Gene Sequence , 2005, Zoological science.

[14]  G. Vunjak‐Novakovic,et al.  Engineering bone-like tissue in vitro using human bone marrow stem cells and silk scaffolds. , 2004, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[15]  M. Tsukada,et al.  Attachment and growth of cultured fibroblast cells on silk protein matrices. , 1995, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[16]  David L. Kaplan,et al.  Non-Invasive Time-Lapsed Monitoring and Quantification of Engineered Bone-Like Tissue , 2007, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[17]  F Vollrath,et al.  Biology of spider silk. , 1999, International journal of biological macromolecules.

[18]  David L. Kaplan,et al.  Silk: biology, structure, properties, and genetics , 1994 .

[19]  G. Freddi,et al.  In vitro evaluation of the inflammatory potential of the silk fibroin. , 1999, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[20]  David L. Kaplan,et al.  Protein-Based Materials , 1997, Bioengineering of Materials.

[21]  Gordana Vunjak-Novakovic,et al.  Silk implants for the healing of critical size bone defects. , 2005, Bone.

[22]  D. Kaplan Fibrous proteins—silk as a model system , 1998 .

[23]  M. Tsukada,et al.  Attachment and growth of fibroblast cells on silk fibroin. , 1995, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[24]  B. F. Matlaga,et al.  Comparative tissue response to six suture materials in rabbit cornea, sclera, and ocular muscle. , 1977, American journal of ophthalmology.

[25]  F. Cui,et al.  The degradation of the three layered nano-carbonated hydroxyapatite/collagen/PLGA composite membrane in vitro. , 2007, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[26]  M. Pankaskie,et al.  The influence of manufacturing procedure on the degradation of poly(lactide-co-glycolide) 85:15 and 50:50 implants , 1997 .

[27]  Michel Vert,et al.  Structure and morphology of solid lactide-glycolide copolymers from 13C n.m.r., infra-red and Raman spectroscopy , 1998 .

[28]  David L Kaplan,et al.  Genetic engineering of fibrous proteins: spider dragline silk and collagen. , 2002, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[29]  David L Kaplan,et al.  Porous silk fibroin 3-D scaffolds for delivery of bone morphogenetic protein-2 in vitro and in vivo. , 2006, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[30]  David L Kaplan,et al.  The inflammatory responses to silk films in vitro and in vivo. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[31]  Gordana Vunjak-Novakovic,et al.  Engineering cartilage‐like tissue using human mesenchymal stem cells and silk protein scaffolds , 2004, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[32]  David L Kaplan,et al.  Silk-based biomaterials. , 2003, Biomaterials.

[33]  D. Schellinger,et al.  A clinical and neuropathologic study of silk suture as an embolic agent for brain arteriovenous malformations. , 1994, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[34]  G. Vunjak‐Novakovic,et al.  Cartilage-like tissue engineering using silk scaffolds and mesenchymal stem cells. , 2006, Tissue engineering.

[35]  David L Kaplan,et al.  Porous 3-D scaffolds from regenerated silk fibroin. , 2004, Biomacromolecules.

[36]  T. N. Salthouse,et al.  Biologic Response to Sutures , 1980, Otolaryngology and head and neck surgery.

[37]  K. Inouye,et al.  Use of Bombyx mori silk fibroin as a substratum for cultivation of animal cells. , 1998, Journal of biochemical and biophysical methods.

[38]  N. Abraham,et al.  Promotive effects of a silk film on epidermal recovery from full-thickness skin wounds. , 2000, Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine. Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine.

[39]  David L Kaplan,et al.  In vitro degradation of silk fibroin. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[40]  Ralph Müller,et al.  Effect of scaffold design on bone morphology in vitro. , 2006, Tissue engineering.

[41]  G. Vunjak‐Novakovic,et al.  Silk based biomaterials to heal critical sized femur defects. , 2006, Bone.

[42]  M. Tsukada,et al.  Effect of the chemical modification of the arginyl residue in Bombyx mori silk fibroin on the attachment and growth of fibroblast cells. , 1998, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[43]  G. Vunjak‐Novakovic,et al.  Bioreactor cultivation of osteochondral grafts. , 2005, Orthodontics & craniofacial research.

[44]  D. Kaplan,et al.  Molecular biology of spider silk. , 2000, Journal of biotechnology.

[45]  David L. Kaplan,et al.  BMP-silk composite matrices heal critically sized femoral defects. , 2007, Bone.

[46]  Ung-Jin Kim,et al.  Influence of macroporous protein scaffolds on bone tissue engineering from bone marrow stem cells. , 2005, Biomaterials.