Expert opinion [accounting]

The infrastructure of a corporate enterprise information system is concerned with acquiring, transferring, converting, and selling economic resources such as cash, inventory, and supplies. Accounting systems with individual computerized modules, such as: payroll, accounts payable and receivable, job costing, order entry, and general ledgers, have traditionally tracked such data, and accounting system designers usually have had a preemptive call on the basic schemes used to type economic data. This is because of a need to meet either statutory reporting requirements for governmental agencies, or private reporting requirements for creditors and shareholders. If accountants use these preemptive privileges to force traditional account coding onto the organization database as its fundamental classification architecture (that is, to require early bookkeeper filtering of transaction data), then many dysfunctional effects arise. Our remedy for these deficiencies is to apply the REA (economic resources, events, and agents) conceptual model when analyzing, designing, implementing, and operating an enterprise information system. REA specifically incorporates the semantics of economic objects into a firm's information architecture. Such embedding facilitates an information system's initial design, as well as couples its production use with knowledge based decision support systems.

[1]  William E. McCarthy,et al.  FSA: Applying AI Techniques to the Familiarization Phase of Financial Decision Making , 1987, IEEE Expert.

[2]  W. McCarthy,et al.  Modeling Business Enterprises as Value-Added Process Hierarchies with Resource-Event-Agent Object Templates , 1997 .

[3]  M. Porter Towards a dynamic theory of strategy , 1991 .

[4]  Thomas R. Gruber,et al.  A translation approach to portable ontology specifications , 1993, Knowl. Acquis..

[5]  William E. McCarthy,et al.  REACH: automated database design integrating first-order theories, reconstructive expertise, and implementation heuristics for accounting information systems , 1999 .

[6]  John F. Sowa,et al.  Knowledge representation: logical, philosophical, and computational foundations , 2000 .

[7]  Daniel E. O'Leary,et al.  Using AI in Knowledge Management: Knowledge Bases and Ontologies , 1998, IEEE Intell. Syst..

[8]  Miklos A. Vasarhelyi,et al.  Virtual auditing agents: the EDGAR Agent challenge , 2000, Decis. Support Syst..

[9]  Carole D. Hafner,et al.  The State of the Art in Ontology Design: A Survey and Comparative Review , 1997, AI Mag..

[10]  Dennis McLeod,et al.  Domain-knowledge-guided schema evolution for accounting database systems , 1995 .

[11]  William E. McCarthy,et al.  Automated Integration of Enterprise Accounting Models Throughout the Systems Development Life Cycle , 1996 .

[12]  Chris Marshall Business Object Management Architecture , 1998 .

[13]  Carole D. Hafner,et al.  The State of the Art in Ontology Design: A Comparative Review , 1997 .

[14]  William E. McCarthy,et al.  The REA Accounting Model: Intellectual Heritage and Prospects for Progress , 1995 .

[15]  Eric L. Denna,et al.  Accounting, Information Technology, and Business Solutions , 1995 .

[16]  Dennis McLeod,et al.  Schema Evolution for Object-based Accounting Database Systems , 1994, ISOOMS.