Predicted Outcome Value Theory in Ongoing Relationships

Theory and research reported in this paper provide both theoretical and methodological advances in the study of predicted outcome value theory (POV) in established, ongoing relationships. From a theoretical perspective, POV, previously a theory focused solely on initial interaction behaviors and consequences, is extended into the realm of ongoing relationships. The propositions of the theory are reformulated and hypotheses derived from them are tested. Overall, the results strongly support this extension and shed new light on its role in understanding the effect of unexpected events. Methodologically, the study provides a longitudinal approach for assessing ongoing relationships both before and after the occurrence of an unexpected event.

[1]  Walid A. Afifi,et al.  Understanding the role of uncertainty in jealousy experience and expression , 1996, Communication Reports.

[2]  D. Miell Remembering relationship development: Constructing a context for interactions. , 1987 .

[3]  Daniel J. Canary,et al.  The effect of uncertainty reducing strategies on young couples' relational repair and intimacy , 1996 .

[4]  T. Mottet The role of sexual orientation in predicting outcome value and anticipated communication behaviors , 2000 .

[5]  Walid A. Afifi,et al.  Characteristics and Consequences of Expectation Violations in Close Relationships , 1998 .

[6]  G. C. Homans,et al.  Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms. , 1975 .

[7]  Leanne K. Knobloch,et al.  Intimacy and the magnitude and experience of episodic relational uncertainty within romantic relationships , 2002 .

[8]  B. Karney,et al.  Memory Bias in Long-Term Close Relationships: Consistency or Improvement? , 2000 .

[9]  Kathy Kellermann,et al.  When Ignorance Is Bliss The Role of Motivation to Reduce Uncertainty in Uncertainty Reduction Theory , 1990 .

[10]  Michael Sunnafrank,et al.  At First Sight: Persistent Relational Effects of Get-Acquainted Conversations , 2004 .

[11]  N. Frye,et al.  "But we've been getting better lately": comparing prospective and retrospective views of relationship development. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[12]  Michael Sunnafrank Predicted Outcome Value and Uncertainty Reduction Theories A Test of Competing Perspectives , 1990 .

[13]  Michael E. Roloff Interpersonal Communication: The Social Exchange Approach , 1982 .

[14]  Michael Sunnafrank Uncertainty in Interpersonal Relationships: A Predicted Outcome Value Interpretation of Gudykunst’s Research Program , 1989 .

[15]  C. Berger,et al.  SOME EXPLORATIONS IN INITIAL INTERACTION AND BEYOND: TOWARD A DEVELOPMENTAL THEORY OF INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION , 1975 .

[16]  G. Miller,et al.  Between people: A new analysis of interpersonal communication , 1975 .

[17]  M. Wanzer,et al.  An exploratory investigation of the relationship between roommates’ first impressions and subsequent communication patterns , 2004 .

[18]  Judee K. Burgoon,et al.  The Impact of Violations on Uncertainty and the Consequences for Attractiveness , 2000 .

[19]  Leanne K. Knobloch Evaluating a contextual model of responses to relational uncertainty increasing events : The role of intimacy, appraisals, and emotions , 2005 .

[20]  R. Sabatelli The Social Psychology of Groups , 2000 .

[21]  Anita L. Vangelisti,et al.  Revealing Family Secrets: The Influence of Topic, Function, and Relationships , 1997 .

[22]  Michael Sunnafrank Predicted Outcome Value in Initial Conversations , 1988 .

[23]  N. Frye,et al.  Revision in memories of relationship development: Do biases persist over time? , 2004 .

[24]  James M. Honeycutt,et al.  Events That Increase Uncertainty in Personal Relationships II Replication and Extension , 1988 .

[25]  L. Baxter,et al.  TURNING POINTS IN DEVELOPING ROMANTIC RELATIONSHIPS , 1986 .

[26]  Patrick McGhee,et al.  Accounting for relationships : explanation, representation, and knowledge , 1987 .

[27]  T. Levine,et al.  When lovers become leery: The relationship between suspicion and accuracy in detecting deception , 1990 .

[28]  Laura Stafford,et al.  A Panel Study of the Associations Between Maintenance Strategies and Relational Characteristics , 2002 .

[29]  Hsin-Vonn Seow,et al.  To ask or not to ask, that is the question , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[30]  James M. Honeycutt EVENTS THAT INCREASE UNCERTAINTY IN PERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS SALLY PLANALP , 1985 .

[31]  Michael Sunnafrank Predicted Outcome Value During Initial Interactions A Reformulation of Uncertainty Reduction Theory , 1986 .

[32]  Leanne K. Knobloch,et al.  Responses to changes in relational uncertainty within dating relationships: Emotions and communication strategies , 2003 .

[33]  S. Duck,et al.  On the Origin of the Specious: Are Personal Relationships Really Interpersonal States? , 1983 .

[34]  Craig A. Smith,et al.  Appraisal theory: Overview, assumptions, varieties, controversies. , 2001 .

[35]  R. Lazarus Relational meaning and discrete emotions. , 2001 .

[36]  Doris L. Werkman,et al.  Conversations With Able-Bodied and Visibly Disabled Strangers An Adversarial Test of Predicted Outcome Value and Uncertainty Reduction Theories , 1991 .

[37]  J. Mccroskey,et al.  The measurement of interpersonal attraction , 1974 .

[38]  M. Browne,et al.  Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit , 1992 .

[39]  Glen W. Clatterbuck Attributional Confidence and Uncertainty in Initial Interaction , 1979 .

[40]  I. Altman,et al.  Social penetration: The development of interpersonal relationships , 1973 .