Telemedical wound care using a new generation of mobile telephones: a feasibility study.

BACKGROUND Leg ulcers are an important cost factor in health care systems. It has been shown that a telemedical wound care consultation can improve quality of care and help reduce costs. In this study, we evaluated the feasibility of telemedical wound care using a new generation of mobile telephones with integrated cameras. OBSERVATIONS Three physicians separately evaluated 61 leg ulcers for the following 9 variables: epithelialization, fibrin, necrosis, and granulation tissue at the center and normal border, erythema, cyanosis, eczema, and hyperpigmentation at the periphery. One physician performed the face-to-face consultation (gold standard), and 2 others performed the remote evaluation. The image was obtained with the mobile telephone and immediately sent via e-mail. To measure the agreement of the evaluation among the 3 physicians, we used Cohen kappa statistics. Overall, the agreement between the remote and face-to-face evaluations was very good, with kappa values of up to 0.94 The image quality was judged to be good in 36 cases (59%) and very good in 12 (20%). The participants felt comfortable making a diagnosis based on the pictures in 50 cases (82%). CONCLUSION Although this study was performed with the first generation of these devices, we were able to demonstrate the feasibility of such a telemedical wound care consultation.

[1]  D. Perednia,et al.  Teledermatology: one application of telemedicine. , 1995, Bulletin of the Medical Library Association.

[2]  D A Perednia,et al.  Comparison of the clinical informativeness of photographs and digital imaging media with multiple-choice receiver operating characteristic analysis. , 1995, Archives of dermatology.

[3]  Perednia Da,et al.  Teledermatology: one application of telemedicine. , 1995 .

[4]  H. D. de Vet,et al.  Inter-observer variation in the assessment of skin ulceration. , 1996, Journal of wound care.

[5]  J. Dover,et al.  The substitution of digital images for dermatologic physical examination. , 1997, Archives of dermatology.

[6]  D. Eedy,et al.  Preliminary results from the Northern Ireland arms of the UK Multicentre Teledermatology Trial: Effect of camera performance on diagnostic accuracy , 1997, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[7]  P. Harrison,et al.  Digital imaging and teledermatology: educational and diagnostic applications of a portable digital imaging system for the trainee dermatologist , 1997, Clinical and experimental dermatology.

[8]  A Bittorf,et al.  Resolution requirements for digital images in dermatology. , 1997, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[9]  C. Morrell,et al.  Cost effectiveness of community leg ulcer clinics: randomised controlled trial , 1998, BMJ.

[10]  L. Martens,et al.  Costs and duration of care for lower extremity ulcers in patients with diabetes. , 1998, Clinical therapeutics.

[11]  J. Kvedar,et al.  Telemedicine in vascular surgery: feasibility of digital imaging for remote management of wounds. , 1998, Journal of vascular surgery.

[12]  A. C. Roth,et al.  Diagnostic quality of low resolution images for tele-woundcare , 1998, AMIA.

[13]  A. C. Roth,et al.  Digital images in the diagnosis of wound healing problems. , 1999, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[14]  K. Harding,et al.  The cost-effectiveness of wound management protocols of care. , 2000, British journal of nursing.

[15]  V. Falanga,et al.  An economic assessment of Apligraf® (Graftskin) for the treatment of hard‐to‐heal venous leg ulcers , 2000, Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society.

[16]  V. Quioc Cost effectiveness in leg ulcer management in the community. , 2001, British journal of community nursing.

[17]  P Couturier,et al.  A preliminary study of the feasibility of wound telecare for the elderly , 2001, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[18]  B. Wakefield,et al.  Evaluating the cost of one telehealth application connecting an acute and long-term care setting. , 2001, Journal of gerontological nursing.

[19]  M. Harrison,et al.  Current Home Care Expenditures for Persons With Leg Ulcers , 2002, Journal of wound, ostomy, and continence nursing : official publication of The Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society.

[20]  C. McCollum,et al.  Evaluating the cost and efficacy of leg ulcer care provided in two large UK health authorities. , 2002, Journal of wound care.

[21]  M. Kerstein Economics of quality ulcer care. , 2003, Dermatology nursing.

[22]  B. Zelickson,et al.  Teledermatology in the nursing home. , 1997, Archives of dermatology.

[23]  Matt Elrod,et al.  Teleassessment Compared with Live Assessment of Pressure Ulcers in a Wound Clinic: A Pilot Study , 2003, Advances in skin & wound care.