Odor discrimination using insect electroantennogram responses from an insect antennal array.

Insects have a highly developed olfactory sensory system, mainly based in their antennae, for the detection and discrimination of volatile compounds in the environment. Electroantennogram (EAG) response profiles of five different insect species, Drosophila melanogaster, Heliothis virescens, Helicoverpa zea, Ostrinia nubilalis and Microplitis croceipes, showed different, species-specific EAG response spectra to 20 volatile compounds tested. The EAG response profiles were then reconstructed for each compound across the five insect species. Most of the compounds could be distinguished by comparing the response spectra. We then used a four-antenna array, called a Quadro-probe EAG, to see if we could discriminate among odorants based on the relative EAG amplitudes evoked when the probe was placed in plumes in a wind tunnel and in a field. Stable EAG responses could be simultaneously and independently recorded with four different insect antennae mounted on the Quadro-probe, and different volatile compounds could be distinguished in real time by comparing relative EAG responses with a combination of differently tuned insect antennae. Regardless of insect species or EAG amplitudes, antennae on the Quadro-probe maintained their responsiveness with higher than 1 peak/s of time resolution.

[1]  D. Schneider Elektrophysiologische Untersuchungen von Chemo- und Mechanorezeptoren der Antenne des Seidenspinners Bombyx mori L. , 2004, Zeitschrift für vergleichende Physiologie.

[2]  J. Hardie,et al.  Perception of volatiles associated with sex and food by different adult forms of the black bean aphid, Aphis fabae , 1994 .

[3]  N. Kasai,et al.  Odorant detection capability of QCR sensors coated with plasma deposited organic films. , 1999, Biosensors & bioelectronics.

[4]  Stefan Schütz,et al.  FIELD EFFECT TRANSISTOR-INSECT ANTENNA JUNCTION , 1997 .

[5]  U. Koch,et al.  Detection of volatiles released by diseased potato tubers using a biosensor on the basis of intact insect antennae , 1999 .

[6]  J. Hardie,et al.  The aphids' peripheral perception of plant volatiles , 1996 .

[7]  Uwe T. Koch,et al.  A portable EAG system for the measurement of pheromone concentrations in the field , 1992 .

[8]  Peter Kordos,et al.  A BIOFET ON THE BASIS OF INTACT INSECT ANTENNAE , 1998 .

[9]  R. Menzel,et al.  The use of electromyogram recordings to quantify odourant discrimination in the honey bee, Apis mellifera , 1989 .

[10]  H E Hummel,et al.  Insect-based BioFETs with improved signal characteristics. , 1999, Biosensors & bioelectronics.

[11]  J. Hardie,et al.  An improved aphid electroantennogram. , 1998, Journal of insect physiology.

[12]  N. Hayashi,et al.  Identification of Floral Volatiles From Ligustrum japonicum that Stimulate Flower-Visiting by Cabbage Butterfly, Pieris rapae , 1998, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[13]  H. Arn,et al.  The Electroantennographic Detector — a Selective and Sensitive Tool in the Gas Chromatographic Analysis of Insect Pheromones , 1975 .

[14]  Isao Shimoyama,et al.  A Pheromone-Guided Mobile Robot that Behaves like a Silkworm Moth with Living Antennae as Pheromone Sensors , 1998, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[15]  Ryohei Kanzaki,et al.  Synthesis of the pheromone-oriented behavior of silkworm moths by a mobile robot with moth antennae as pheromone sensors , 1999 .

[16]  A. Cork Identification of electrophysiologically‐active compounds for New World screwworm, Cochliomyia hominivorax, in larval wound fluid , 1994, Medical and veterinary entomology.

[17]  W. Roelofs,et al.  Sex pheromone perception: electroantennogram responses of the red-banded leaf roller moth. , 1971, Journal of insect physiology.

[18]  T. Eisner,et al.  Sex attractant of an arctiid moth (Utetheisa ornatrix): A pulsed chemical signal , 1980, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[19]  J. Carlson,et al.  Olfactory physiology in the Drosophila antenna and maxillary palp: acj6 distinguishes two classes of odorant pathways. , 1992, Journal of neurobiology.

[20]  D R Walt,et al.  Optical sensor arrays for odor recognition. , 1998, Biosensors & bioelectronics.

[21]  F. Marion-Poll,et al.  Identification of Floral Volatiles Involved in Recognition of Oilseed Rape Flowers, Brassica napus by Honeybees, Apis mellifera , 1997, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[22]  A portable electroantennogram sensor for routine measurements of pheromone concentrations in greenhouses , 1998 .

[23]  Thomas C. Baker,et al.  Field and laboratory electroantennographic measurements of pheromone plume structure correlated with oriental fruit moth behaviour , 1989 .

[24]  J. Visser,et al.  Olfactory antennal responses to plant volatiles in apterous virginoparae of the vetch aphid Megoura viciae , 1995 .

[25]  J. Hardie,et al.  Electroantennogram and behavioural responses of different forms of the bird cherry-oat aphid, Rhopalosiphum padi, to sex pheromone and a plant volatile. , 2000, Journal of insect physiology.

[26]  T. Baker,et al.  A pulsed cloud of sex pheromone elicits upwind flight in male moths , 1985 .

[27]  W. Roelofs,et al.  Sustained-flight tunnel for measuring insect responses to wind-borne sex pheromones , 1978, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[28]  U. Koch,et al.  EAG measurement of pheromone distribution in apple orchards treated for mating disruption of Cydia pomonella , 1997 .