Human biological and nonbiological point-light movements: Creation and validation of the dataset

Human action perception is so powerful that people can identify movement efficiently in the absence of pictorial information, such as in point-light displays. Interest is growing in this type of stimulus for research in neuroscience. This interest stems from the advantage of separating the component of pure human action kinematics from other pictorial information, such as facial expression and muscle contraction. Although several groups have previously developed datasets of human point-light actions, due to the lack of datasets composed of daily actions with short durations, we developed 20 biological and 40 control (scrambled) point-light movements by using the technique of recording people wearing reflector patches. The videos are about 1 s long. Subsequently, we performed a judgment task in which 100 participants (50 male and 50 female) evaluated each video according to three categories: human action resemblance, performed action, and gender of actor. We present the mean scores of each evaluation for each video, and further propose a selection of the most suitable videos to be used as human point-light action displays and scrambled point-light displays for control. Finally, we discuss our findings on the gender attributions of the point-light displays.

[1]  G. Johansson Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis , 1973 .

[2]  J. Cutting Generation of Synthetic Male and Female Walkers through Manipulation of a Biomechanical Invariant , 1978, Perception.

[3]  K. Verfaillie,et al.  Transsaccadic integration of biological motion. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[4]  G. Mather,et al.  Gender discrimination in biological motion displays based on dynamic cues , 1994, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[5]  David C. Brogan,et al.  Animating human athletics , 1995, SIGGRAPH.

[6]  R. Blake,et al.  Brain Areas Involved in Perception of Biological Motion , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[7]  Aaron Hertzmann,et al.  Style machines , 2000, SIGGRAPH 2000.

[8]  N. Birbaumer,et al.  Recognition of Point-Light Biological Motion Displays by Young Children , 2001, Perception.

[9]  Harry Shum,et al.  Motion texture: a two-level statistical model for character motion synthesis , 2002, ACM Trans. Graph..

[10]  Karl Verfaillie,et al.  Creating stimuli for the study of biological-motion perception , 2002, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[11]  C. Karen Liu,et al.  Synthesis of complex dynamic character motion from simple animations , 2002, ACM Trans. Graph..

[12]  J. Haxby,et al.  fMRI Responses to Video and Point-Light Displays of Moving Humans and Manipulable Objects , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[13]  T. Shipley,et al.  Markerless motion-capture for point-light displays , 2003 .

[14]  F. Binkofski,et al.  The mirror neuron system and action recognition , 2004, Brain and Language.

[15]  Karl Verfaillie,et al.  Perception of biological motion: A stimulus set of human point-light actions , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[16]  M. Sereno,et al.  Point-Light Biological Motion Perception Activates Human Premotor Cortex , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[17]  R. Passingham,et al.  Action observation and acquired motor skills: an FMRI study with expert dancers. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[18]  A. Williams,et al.  An evaluation of the minimal constraining information during observation for movement reproduction. , 2005, Acta psychologica.

[19]  Jim W Kay,et al.  Gender recognition from point-light walkers. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[20]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Repetitive TMS over posterior STS disrupts perception of biological motion , 2005, Vision Research.

[21]  K. Verfaillie,et al.  Perceiving depth in point-light actions , 2006, Perception & psychophysics.

[22]  F. Pollick,et al.  A motion capture library for the study of identity, gender, and emotion perception from biological motion , 2006, Behavior research methods.

[23]  R. Passingham,et al.  Seeing or Doing? Influence of Visual and Motor Familiarity in Action Observation , 2006, Current Biology.

[24]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Adaptation aftereffects in the perception of gender from biological motion. , 2006, Journal of vision.

[25]  J. Pineda,et al.  Recognition of point-light biological motion: Mu rhythms and mirror neuron activity , 2007, Behavioural Brain Research.

[26]  Ruth Campbell,et al.  Perception of biological motion in autism , 2007 .

[27]  N. Troje,et al.  Gender bending: auditory cues affect visual judgements of gender in biological motion displays , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.

[28]  R. Kakigi,et al.  EVELOPMENTAL CHANGES IN POINT-LIGHT WALKER PROCESSING URING CHILDHOOD AND ADOLESCENCE: AN EVENT-RELATED OTENTIAL STUDY , 2022 .

[29]  G. Casadesus,et al.  Walking Toward a Convergence in Aging Research , 2009, Front. Neurosci..

[30]  Claudio Del Percio,et al.  Judgment of actions in experts: A high-resolution EEG study in elite athletes , 2009, NeuroImage.

[31]  N. Troje,et al.  The facing bias in biological motion perception: Effects of stimulus gender and observer sex , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[32]  J. P. Thomas,et al.  I can see you better if I can hear you coming: action-consistent sounds facilitate the visual detection of human gait. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[33]  N. Troje,et al.  Why is the average walker male , 2010 .

[34]  Martin A. Giese,et al.  Predicting point-light actions in real-time , 2010 .

[35]  P. Haggard,et al.  Experts see it all: configural effects in action observation , 2010, Psychological research.

[36]  F. Pollick,et al.  Expertise with multisensory events eliminates the effect of biological motion rotation on audiovisual synchrony perception. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[37]  N. Troje,et al.  The facing bias in biological motion perception: structure, kinematics, and body parts , 2011, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[38]  Pejman Sehatpour,et al.  The neurophysiology of human biological motion processing: A high-density electrical mapping study , 2011, NeuroImage.

[39]  J. Parkinson,et al.  Movement kinematics affect action prediction: comparing human to non-human point-light actions , 2012, Psychological Research.

[40]  G. Gredebäck,et al.  Humans Anticipate the Goal of other People’s Point-Light Actions , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[41]  Neil G. Muggleton,et al.  Effects of TMS over Premotor and Superior Temporal Cortices on Biological Motion Perception , 2012, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[42]  R. Adorni,et al.  Who needs a referee? How incorrect basketball actions are automatically detected by basketball players' brain , 2012, Scientific Reports.

[43]  K. Verfaillie,et al.  Further Explorations of the Facing Bias in Biological Motion Perception: Perspective Cues, Observer Sex, and Response Times , 2013, PloS one.

[44]  Anne Springer,et al.  Dynamic Simulation and Static Matching for Action Prediction: Evidence From Body Part Priming , 2013, Cogn. Sci..