Temporal Changes in Randomness of Bird Communities across Central Europe

Many studies have examined whether communities are structured by random or deterministic processes, and both are likely to play a role, but relatively few studies have attempted to quantify the degree of randomness in species composition. We quantified, for the first time, the degree of randomness in forest bird communities based on an analysis of spatial autocorrelation in three regions of Germany. The compositional dissimilarity between pairs of forest patches was regressed against the distance between them. We then calculated the y-intercept of the curve, i.e. the ‘nugget’, which represents the compositional dissimilarity at zero spatial distance. We therefore assume, following similar work on plant communities, that this represents the degree of randomness in species composition. We then analysed how the degree of randomness in community composition varied over time and with forest management intensity, which we expected to reduce the importance of random processes by increasing the strength of environmental drivers. We found that a high portion of the bird community composition could be explained by chance (overall mean of 0.63), implying that most of the variation in local bird community composition is driven by stochastic processes. Forest management intensity did not consistently affect the mean degree of randomness in community composition, perhaps because the bird communities were relatively insensitive to management intensity. We found a high temporal variation in the degree of randomness, which may indicate temporal variation in assembly processes and in the importance of key environmental drivers. We conclude that the degree of randomness in community composition should be considered in bird community studies, and the high values we find may indicate that bird community composition is relatively hard to predict at the regional scale.

[1]  Jürgen Bauhus,et al.  An index of forest management intensity based on assessment of harvested tree volume, tree species composition and dead wood origin , 2014 .

[2]  S. Renner,et al.  Movement and ranging patterns of the Common Chaffinch in heterogeneous forest landscapes , 2014, PeerJ.

[3]  Stephan Getzin,et al.  The importance of heterogeneity revisited from a multiscale and multitaxa approach , 2013 .

[4]  William A. Link,et al.  The North American Breeding Bird Survey 1966–2011: Summary Analysis and Species Accounts , 2013 .

[5]  S. Renner,et al.  Food Preferences of Winter Bird Communities in Different Forest Types , 2012, PloS one.

[6]  Craig Wilson,et al.  Chance in plant communities: a new approach to its measurement using the nugget from spatial autocorrelation , 2012 .

[7]  J. Pearce‐Higgins,et al.  Disentangling the Relative Importance of Changes in Climate and Land-Use Intensity in Driving Recent Bird Population Trends , 2012, PloS one.

[8]  Andrew G. Horn,et al.  Observer Effects and Avian-Call-Count Survey Quality: Rare-Species Biases and Overconfidence , 2012 .

[9]  Werner Ulrich,et al.  Statistical challenges in null model analysis , 2012 .

[10]  T. Lovejoy,et al.  Understory Bird Communities in Amazonian Rainforest Fragments: Species Turnover through 25 Years Post-Isolation in Recovering Landscapes , 2011, PloS one.

[11]  Marcela Suarez-Rubio,et al.  Influence of exurban development on bird species richness and diversity , 2011, Journal of Ornithology.

[12]  William F. Fagan,et al.  Landscape matrix and species traits mediate responses of Neotropical resident birds to forest fragmentation in Jamaica , 2010 .

[13]  Jens Nieschulze,et al.  Implementing large-scale and long-term functional biodiversity research: The Biodiversity Exploratories , 2010 .

[14]  S. Goetz,et al.  Lidar remote sensing variables predict breeding habitat of a Neotropical migrant bird. , 2010, Ecology.

[15]  J. Elith,et al.  Species Distribution Models: Ecological Explanation and Prediction Across Space and Time , 2009 .

[16]  Cameron S Gillies,et al.  Riparian corridors enhance movement of a forest specialist bird in fragmented tropical forest , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  Kenneth H. Pollock,et al.  A novel field evaluation of the effectiveness of distance and independent observer sampling to estimate aural avian detection probabilities , 2008 .

[18]  A. Dobson,et al.  Projected Impacts of Climate and Land-Use Change on the Global Diversity of Birds , 2007, PLoS biology.

[19]  D. Lindenmayer,et al.  Landscape modification and habitat fragmentation: a synthesis , 2007 .

[20]  Robert I. McDonald,et al.  The distance decay of similarity in ecological communities , 2007 .

[21]  Heiko Balzter,et al.  Modelling relationships between birds and vegetation structure using airborne LiDAR data: a review with case studies from agricultural and woodland environments , 2005 .

[22]  Stephen P. Hubbell,et al.  Neutral theory in community ecology and the hypothesis of functional equivalence , 2005 .

[23]  M. Willig,et al.  Scale dependence in the species-richness-productivity relationship: The role of species turnover , 2004 .

[24]  J. Andrew Royle,et al.  ESTIMATING SITE OCCUPANCY RATES WHEN DETECTION PROBABILITIES ARE LESS THAN ONE , 2002, Ecology.

[25]  Han Olff,et al.  Fractal geometry predicts varying body size scaling relationships for mammal and bird home ranges , 2002, Nature.

[26]  O. Honnay,et al.  Plant community assembly along dendritic networks of small forest streams , 2001 .

[27]  J. Nichols,et al.  Forest fragmentation and bird community dynamics: inference at regional scales , 2001 .

[28]  B. Anderson,et al.  Direct measurement of spatial autocorrelation at the community level in four plant communities , 2000 .

[29]  J. Stephen Brewer,et al.  Ecological Assembly Rules: Perspectives, Advances, Retreats , 2000 .

[30]  G. E. Hutchinson,et al.  The Balance of Nature and Human Impact: The paradox of the plankton , 2013 .

[31]  G. E. Hutchinson,et al.  Homage to Santa Rosalia or Why Are There So Many Kinds of Animals? , 1959, The American Naturalist.

[32]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[33]  Jessie A. Wells,et al.  Land-use intensification reduces functional redundancy and response diversity in plant communities. , 2010, Ecology letters.

[34]  Fabrice DeClerck,et al.  Loss of functional diversity under land use intensification across multiple taxa. , 2009, Ecology letters.

[35]  J. Gamarra,et al.  Metapopulation Ecology , 2007 .

[36]  Rk Colwell.  EstimateS : Statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples, v. 8.0. User's guide and application , 2005 .

[37]  F. Messier,et al.  Intraspecific Variation in Home Range Overlap with Habitat Quality: A Comparison among Brown Bear Populations , 2004, Evolutionary Ecology.

[38]  J. Drake,et al.  Ecological Assembly Rules: On the nature of the assembly trajectory , 1999 .

[39]  W. Link,et al.  The North American Breeding Bird Survey Results and Analysis , 1997 .