Spectral moments vs discrete cosine transformation coefficients: Evaluation of acoustic measures distinguishing two merging German fricatives.

The results of the quantification of the acoustic differences between German /ç/ and /ʃ/ in three speaker groups with varying contrast realizations are presented. Data for two speaker groups were collected in Berlin and Kiel, where the contrast is still realized. Data for a third group were collected in Berlin from speakers of Hood German-a youth-style multiethnolect spoken by adolescents in multilingual and multicultural neighborhoods of Berlin-where the contrast has weakened or is even lost. A forced choice perception test showed that listeners reliably differentiate these two fricatives in minimal pairs produced by the speakers from Berlin and Kiel, but fail to do so for the productions of the Hood German speakers. The acoustic analysis reveals that spectrally, the fricatives are very similar in all varieties. The spectral moments (Center of Gravity, standard deviation, kurtosis, skewness) fail to reveal the differences between the fricatives that are apparent from visual inspection of the spectra and the perceived auditory differences. Analyses of the discrete cosine transformation coefficients, however, better quantify these differences. This study suggests that minute differences between fricatives that vary between speaker groups may be captured more reliably with discrete cosine transformations compared to spectral moments.

[1]  Jeff Mielke,et al.  The Emergence of Distinctive Features , 2008 .

[2]  Russell V. Lenth,et al.  Least-Squares Means: The R Package lsmeans , 2016 .

[3]  Jonathan Harrington,et al.  The quantification of place of articulation assimilation in electropalatographic data using the similarity index (SI) , 2007 .

[4]  G. W. Hughes,et al.  Spectral Properties of Fricative Consonants , 1956 .

[5]  Kiyoko Yoneyama,et al.  Language specificity in the perception of voiceless sibilant fricatives in Japanese and English: implications for cross-language differences in speech-sound development. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  Fangfang Li,et al.  Contrast and covert contrast: The phonetic development of voiceless sibilant fricatives in English and Japanese toddlers , 2009, J. Phonetics.

[8]  J Harrington,et al.  Acoustic evidence for dynamic formant trajectories in Australian English vowels. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  Matthew Gordon,et al.  A cross-linguistic acoustic study of voiceless fricatives , 2002, Journal of the International Phonetic Association.

[10]  Luis M. T. Jesus,et al.  Acoustic Evidence of New Sibilants in the Pronunciation of Young Polish Women , 2016 .

[11]  Heike Wiese,et al.  Grammatical innovation in multiethnic urban Europe: New linguistic practices among adolescents , 2009 .

[12]  J. Harrington,et al.  The articulatory and acoustic characteristics of Polish sibilants and their consequences for diachronic change , 2016, Journal of the International Phonetic Association.

[13]  M. Weirich The influence of NATURE and NURTURE on speaker-specific parameters in twins’ speech: acoustics, articulation and perception , 2012 .

[14]  Pawel M. Nowak The role of vowel transitions and frication noise in the perception of Polish sibilants , 2006, J. Phonetics.

[15]  Rochelle S Newman,et al.  Using links between speech perception and speech production to evaluate different acoustic metrics: a preliminary report. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  Stefanie Jannedy,et al.  Sound change in an urban setting: Category instability of the palatal fricative in Berlin , 2014 .

[17]  Henning Reetz,et al.  Crosslinguistic acoustic categorization of sibilants independent of phonological status , 1998 .

[18]  Scott A. Jackson,et al.  Functional Load and the Lexicon: Evidence that Syntactic Category and Frequency Relationships in Minimal Lemma Pairs Predict the Loss of Phoneme contrasts in Language Change , 2013, Language and speech.

[19]  A. Jongman,et al.  Acoustic characteristics of English fricatives. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  P. Milenkovic,et al.  Statistical analysis of word-initial voiceless obstruents: preliminary data. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  Victoria B. Anderson,et al.  Acoustic and Perceptual Similarities Between English and Korean Sibilants: Implications for Second Language Acquisition , 2008 .