The New Empirical Biopolitics

Political science traditionally has either ignored biology in favor of purely environmental explanations for political phenomena or merely ruminated about the likely role of biology, leaving data-based research on biopolitics in dangerously short supply. Currently, attention to the apparent genetic basis for political and social orientations holds the greatest promise of advancing empirical biopolitics. Thus, in this essay, we orient behavior genetics research in the larger framework of biology and politics, confront its normative implications, describe the techniques involved, assess the strengths and weaknesses of commonly employed data and procedures, and describe the next steps in this research stream. Because these next steps involve molecular genetic work, we provide some background genetic information, but we mainly urge political scientists to join interdisciplinary teams so that nature and nurture can both be employed in ongoing efforts to understand the sources of mass-scale human politics.

[1]  Evan Charney,et al.  Genes and Ideologies , 2008, Perspectives on Politics.

[2]  I. H. Carmen.  Genetic Configurations of Political Phenomena: New Theories, New Methods , 2007 .

[3]  N. Martin,et al.  Not by Twins Alone: Using the Extended Twin Family Designed to Investigate the Genetic Basis of Political Beliefs , 2007 .

[4]  R. Passingham,et al.  Reading Hidden Intentions in the Human Brain , 2007, Current Biology.

[5]  N. Martin,et al.  The Genetics of Voting: An Australian Twin Study , 2007, Behavior genetics.

[6]  Ross A. Hammond,et al.  The Evolution of Ethnocentrism , 2006 .

[7]  Stephan Hamann,et al.  Neural Bases of Motivated Reasoning: An fMRI Study of Emotional Constraints on Partisan Political Judgment in the 2004 U.S. Presidential Election , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[8]  Dominic D. P. Johnson,et al.  Overconfidence in wargames: experimental evidence on expectations, aggression, gender and testosterone , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[9]  J. Block,et al.  Nursery school personality and political orientation two decades later , 2006 .

[10]  J. Jost.  The end of the end of ideology. , 2006, The American psychologist.

[11]  Claudio Barbaranelli,et al.  Personality and Politics: Values, Traits, and Political Choice , 2006 .

[12]  Matthew W. Hahn,et al.  Ancient and Recent Positive Selection Transformed Opioid cis-Regulation in Humans , 2005, PLoS biology.

[13]  Sarah Norgate,et al.  The equal environments assumption of classical twin studies may not hold. , 2005, The British journal of educational psychology.

[14]  Christian Dina,et al.  AVPR1a and SLC6A4 Gene Polymorphisms Are Associated with Creative Dance Performance , 2005, PLoS genetics.

[15]  Jack Block,et al.  Ego-control and ego-resiliency: Generalization of self-report scales based on personality descriptions from acquaintances, clinicians, and the self , 2005 .

[16]  U. Fischbacher,et al.  Oxytocin increases trust in humans , 2005, Nature.

[17]  M. Lodge,et al.  The Automaticity of Affect for Political Leaders, Groups, and Issues: An Experimental Test of the Hot Cognition Hypothesis , 2005 .

[18]  J. R. Alford,et al.  Are Political Orientations Genetically Transmitted? , 2005, American Political Science Review.

[19]  G. Robinson,et al.  Beyond Nature and Nurture , 2023, Journal of Human Resources.

[20]  J. Orbell,et al.  “Machiavellian” Intelligence as a Basis for the Evolution of Cooperative Dispositions , 2004, American Political Science Review.

[21]  P. Converse.  The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics , 2004 .

[22]  G. Robinson,et al.  Gene Expression Profiles in the Brain Predict Behavior in Individual Honey Bees , 2003, Science.

[23]  C. Broeckhoven,et al.  Genetics of personality: are we making progress? , 2003, Molecular Psychiatry.

[24]  A. Caspi,et al.  Influence of Life Stress on Depression: Moderation by a Polymorphism in the 5-HTT Gene , 2003, Science.

[25]  T. Videon,et al.  Rethinking twins and environments: possible social sources for assumed genetic influences in twin research. , 2003, Journal of health and social behavior.

[26]  J. Jost,et al.  Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. , 2003, Psychological bulletin.

[27]  Kees van Oers,et al.  Realized heritability of personalities in the great tit (Parus major) , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[28]  G. Cochran,et al.  In our genes , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  J. Swanson,et al.  Evidence of positive selection acting at the human dopamine receptor D4 gene locus , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  G. Saucier,et al.  A multivariate analysis of 59 candidate genes in personality traits: the temperament and character inventory , 2000, Clinical genetics.

[31]  A. Tellegen,et al.  Authoritarianism revisited: genetic and environmental influences examined in twins reared apart and together , 1999 .

[32]  Julia Dmitrieva,et al.  Population Migration and the Variation of Dopamine D4 Receptor (DRD4) Allele Frequencies Around the Globe , 1999 .

[33]  S. Gosling,et al.  Personality Dimensions in Nonhuman Animals , 1999 .

[34]  N. Martin,et al.  Religious attendance and frequency of alcohol use: same genes or same environments: a bivariate extended twin kinship model , 1999, Twin Research.

[35]  Philip G. Zimbardo,et al.  Personality profiles and political parties , 1999 .

[36]  E. Ostrom.  A Behavioral Approach to the Rational Choice Theory of Collective Action: Presidential Address, American Political Science Association, 1997 , 1998, American Political Science Review.

[37]  M. Neale,et al.  Age Changes in the Causes of Individual Differences in Conservatism , 1997, Behavior genetics.

[38]  Richard A. Weinberg,et al.  Genetic and Environmental Influences on Vocational Interests Assessed Using Adoptive and Biological Families and Twins Reared Apart and Together , 1994 .

[39]  N L Segal,et al.  “Sources of Human Psychological Differences: The Minnesota Study of Twins Reared Apart” (1990), by , 2018 .

[40]  R. Plomin.  The role of inheritance in behavior. , 1990, Science.

[41]  J. P. Rushton,et al.  Gene-culture coevolution of complex social behavior: human altruism and mate choice. , 1986, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[42]  H. Eysenck,et al.  Transmission of social attitudes. , 1986, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[43]  Douglas Madsen.  Power Seekers are Different: Further Biochemical Evidence , 1986, American Political Science Review.

[44]  A. Pusey.  Chimpanzee Politics: Power and Sex among Apes, France de Waal. Harper & Row, New York (1982), 223, Price $16.50 , 1984 .

[45]  D. Ward.  Right-Wing Authoritarianism , 1982, American Political Science Review.

[46]  Morris P. Fiorina,et al.  Retrospective voting in American national elections , 1981 .

[47]  Edward G. Carmines,et al.  The Two Faces of Issue Voting , 1980, American Political Science Review.

[48]  Sandra Scarr,et al.  Twin method: Defense of a critical assumption , 1979, Behavior genetics.

[49]  H. McClosky.  Conservatism and Personality , 1958, American Political Science Review.

[50]  T. Adorno.  The Authoritarian Personality , 1950 .

[51]  M. Mead,et al.  Coming of Age in Samoa , 1929 .

[52]  P. Hatemi,et al.  The genetics of political attitudes , 2007 .

[53]  Riccardo Baschetti,et al.  Evolutionary, neurobiological, gene-based solution of the ideological "puzzle" of human altruism and cooperation. , 2007, Medical hypotheses.

[54]  Robert M. Sapolsky,et al.  A Natural History of Peace , 2006 .

[55]  K. Frazer,et al.  Common deletions and SNPs are in linkage disequilibrium in the human genome , 2006, Nature Genetics.

[56]  J W Foppe van Mil,et al.  Our Genes , 2005, Pharmacy World and Science.

[57]  P. Visscher,et al.  Twin study of genetic and environmental influences on adult body size, shape, and composition , 2004, International Journal of Obesity.

[58]  C. van Broeckhoven,et al.  Genetics of personality: are we making progress? , 2003, Molecular psychiatry.

[59]  T. Bouchard,et al.  Genetic and environmental influences on human psychological differences. , 2003, Journal of neurobiology.

[60]  W. R. Neuman,et al.  Affective Intelligence and Political Judgment , 2000 .

[61]  D. Lykken,et al.  The Genetics of Genius , 1998 .

[62]  Joseph E LeDoux.  The emotional brain , 1996 .

[63]  B. Altemeyer,et al.  The Authoritarian Specter , 1996 .

[64]  Michael C. Neale,et al.  A test of the equal-environment assumption in twin studies of psychiatric illness , 1993, Behavior genetics.

[65]  A. Tesser,et al.  The importance of heritability in psychological research: the case of attitudes. , 1993, Psychological review.

[66]  R. Plomin.  Behavioral genetics. , 1991, Research publications - Association for Research in Nervous and Mental Disease.

[67]  Hans J. Eysenck,et al.  Genes, culture, and personality : an empirical approach , 1989 .

[68]  G. Holton.  Sociobiology: the new synthesis? , 1977, Newsletter on science, technology & human values.