Amygdala and fusiform gyrus temporal dynamics: Responses to negative facial expressions

BackgroundThe amygdala habituates in response to repeated human facial expressions; however, it is unclear whether this brain region habituates to schematic faces (i.e., simple line drawings or caricatures of faces). Using an fMRI block design, 16 healthy participants passively viewed repeated presentations of schematic and human neutral and negative facial expressions. Percent signal changes within anatomic regions-of-interest (amygdala and fusiform gyrus) were calculated to examine the temporal dynamics of neural response and any response differences based on face type.ResultsThe amygdala and fusiform gyrus had a within-run "U" response pattern of activity to facial expression blocks. The initial block within each run elicited the greatest activation (relative to baseline) and the final block elicited greater activation than the preceding block. No significant differences between schematic and human faces were detected in the amygdala or fusiform gyrus.ConclusionThe "U" pattern of response in the amygdala and fusiform gyrus to facial expressions suggests an initial orienting, habituation, and activation recovery in these regions. Furthermore, this study is the first to directly compare brain responses to schematic and human facial expressions, and the similarity in brain responses suggest that schematic faces may be useful in studying amygdala activation.

[1]  J. Aronoff,et al.  The recognition of threatening facial stimuli. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[2]  S. Rauch,et al.  Differential prefrontal cortex and amygdala habituation to repeatedly presented emotional stimuli , 2001, Neuroreport.

[3]  Ewald Moser,et al.  Amygdala activation at 3T in response to human and avatar facial expressions of emotions , 2007, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[4]  E. Rolls,et al.  The effects of stimulus novelty and familiarity on neuronal activity in the amygdala of monkeys performing recognition memory tasks , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[5]  S. Rauch,et al.  Response and Habituation of the Human Amygdala during Visual Processing of Facial Expression , 1996, Neuron.

[6]  M. Tarr,et al.  The Fusiform Face Area is Part of a Network that Processes Faces at the Individual Level , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[7]  A. Beck,et al.  An inventory for measuring depression. , 1961, Archives of general psychiatry.

[8]  Charles D. Smith,et al.  Neural substrates of facial emotion processing using fMRI. , 2001, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[9]  D. Kennedy,et al.  The human brain age 7-11 years: a volumetric analysis based on magnetic resonance images. , 1996, Cerebral cortex.

[10]  R W Cox,et al.  AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. , 1996, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[11]  A. Ohman,et al.  The face in the crowd revisited: a threat advantage with schematic stimuli. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[12]  D. Amaral,et al.  Topographic organization of projections from the amygdala to the visual cortex in the macaque monkey , 2003, Neuroscience.

[13]  A M Dale,et al.  Estimation and detection of event‐related fMRI signals with temporally correlated noise: A statistically efficient and unbiased approach , 2000, Human brain mapping.

[14]  P. Ekman Pictures of Facial Affect , 1976 .

[15]  E. N. Sokolov,et al.  The dynamics of cortico-amygdala and autonomic activity over the experimental time course of fear perception. , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[16]  S. Rauch,et al.  A functional MRI study of human amygdala responses to facial expressions of fear versus anger. , 2001, Emotion.

[17]  Håkan Fischer,et al.  Enhanced amygdala responses to emotional versus neutral schematic facial expressions , 2002, Neuroreport.

[18]  Christopher I. Wright,et al.  Novelty responses and differential effects of order in the amygdala, substantia innominata, and inferior temporal cortex , 2003, NeuroImage.

[19]  Michelle M. Wedig,et al.  Differential amygdala habituation to neutral faces in young and elderly adults , 2005, Neuroscience Letters.

[20]  M. Mather,et al.  Angry faces get noticed quickly: threat detection is not impaired among older adults. , 2006, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[21]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[22]  Thomas Straube,et al.  Effect of task conditions on brain responses to threatening faces in social phobics: An event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging study , 2004, Biological Psychiatry.

[23]  Peter Fransson,et al.  Age-differential patterns of brain activation during perception of angry faces , 2005, Neuroscience Letters.