Minimal Representations for Uncertainty and Estimation in Projective Spaces

Estimation using homogeneous entities has to cope with obstacles such as singularities of covariance matrices and redundant parametrizations which do not allow an immediate definition of maximum likelihood estimation and lead to estimation problems with more parameters than necessary. The paper proposes a representation of the uncertainty of all types of geometric entities and estimation procedures for geometric entities and transformations which (1) only require the minimum number of parameters, (2) are free of singularities, (3) allow for a consistent update within an iterative procedure, (4) enable to exploit the simplicity of homogeneous coordinates to represent geometric constraints and (5) allow to handle geometric entities which are at infinity or at least very far, avoiding the usage of concepts like the inverse depth. Such representations are already available for transformations such as rotations, motions (Rosenhahn 2002), homographies (Begelfor 2005), or the projective correlation with fundamental matrix (Bartoli 2004) all being elements of some Lie group. The uncertainty is represented in the tangent space of the manifold, namely the corresponding Lie algebra. However, to our knowledge no such representations are developed for the basic geometric entities such as points, lines and planes, as in addition to use the tangent space of the manifolds we need transformation of the entities such that they stay on their specific manifold during the estimation process. We develop the concept, discuss its usefulness for bundle adjustment and demonstrate (a) its superiority compared to more simple methods for vanishing point estimation, (b) its rigour when estimating 3D lines from 3D points and (c) its applicability for determining 3D lines from observed image line segments in a multi view setup.

[1]  Christian Gebken Conformal geometric algebra in stochastic optimization problems of 3D-vision applications , 2009 .

[2]  James Bethel,et al.  ISPRS journal of photogrammetry and remote sensing, report for the period 1996-2000 , 2000 .

[3]  Adrien Bartoli,et al.  Nonlinear estimation of the fundamental matrix with minimal parameters , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[4]  Stephan Heuel,et al.  Uncertain Projective Geometry: Statistical Reasoning for Polyhedral Object Reconstruction , 2004, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[5]  Pau Gargallo,et al.  Conic Fitting Using the Geometric Distance , 2007, ACCV.

[6]  Jitendra Malik,et al.  Tracking people with twists and exponential maps , 1998, Proceedings. 1998 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (Cat. No.98CB36231).

[7]  J. Chris McGlone,et al.  Manual of photogrammetry , 2004 .

[8]  Hans-Peter Seidel,et al.  Exploiting global connectivity constraints for reconstruction of 3D line segments from images , 2010, 2010 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[9]  金谷 健一 Statistical optimization for geometric computation : theory and practice , 2005 .

[10]  David Liebowitz,et al.  Camera Calibration and Reconstruction of Geometry from Images , 2001 .

[11]  W. Förstner,et al.  Reasoning with uncertain points, straight lines, and straight line segments in 2D , 2009 .

[12]  Antonio Criminisi,et al.  Accurate Visual Metrology from Single and Multiple Uncalibrated Images , 2001, Distinguished Dissertations.

[13]  W. Förstner OPTIMAL VANISHING POINT DETECTION AND ROTATION ESTIMATION OF SINGLE IMAGES FROM A LEGOLAND SCENE , 2010 .

[14]  Michael Werman,et al.  How to put probabilities on homographies , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[15]  Karl Åström Using Combinations of Points, Lines and Conics to Estimate Structure and Motion , 1998 .

[16]  Robert T. Collins,et al.  Model acquisition using stochastic projective geometry , 1993 .

[17]  Bodo Rosenhahn,et al.  Monocular Pose Estimation of Kinematic Chains , 2002 .

[18]  H. Pottmann,et al.  Computational Line Geometry , 2001 .

[19]  Edward Hughes,et al.  Engineering Science , 1965 .

[20]  Adrien Bartoli,et al.  Structure-from-motion using lines: Representation, triangulation, and bundle adjustment , 2005, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[21]  Singularity and Nonnormality in the Classification of Compositional Data , 1998 .

[22]  E. Mikhail,et al.  Manual of Photogrammetry, 5th Edition , 2006 .

[23]  Karl-Rudolf Koch,et al.  Parameter estimation and hypothesis testing in linear models , 1988 .