Generic Dry-Contact Ear-EEG

Generic dry-contact ear-EEG allows for discreet, user-friendly, unobtrusive, cost-effective and convenient recordings of EEG in real-life settings. In this study we introduce a new generic earpiece design with larger internal ear electrode distances, resulting in an increased spatial coverage compared to previous generic earpiece designs. The signal quality of ear-Fpz, within-ear (the measuring and reference electrode located in the same ear) and cross-ear (the measuring electrodes located in one ear and the reference electrode in the opposite ear) electrode configurations of the developed generic earpiece was evaluated with auditory steady-state responses (ASSR) and compared to dry-contact cEEGrid. Ten subjects with different ear sizes were included. The recordings were performed in a sleep setup, where the subjects were lying on a bed and the effect of sleeping position (back vs. sides) was investigated. We found that the generic earpiece attained statistically significant ASSRs with ear-Fpz, within-ear and cross-ear electrode configurations. However, the dry-contact cEEGrid achieved significantly higher average ASSR signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) compared to the generic earpiece. Additionally, this study showed no significant difference between back and side positions for the ear-EEG.

[1]  M. Don,et al.  A direct approach for the design of chirp stimuli used for the recording of auditory brainstem responses. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  Preben Kidmose,et al.  Automatic sleep staging using ear-EEG , 2017, BioMedical Engineering OnLine.

[3]  Thomas Lunner,et al.  Toward EEG-Assisted Hearing Aids: Objective Threshold Estimation Based on Ear-EEG in Subjects With Sensorineural Hearing Loss , 2018, Trends in Hearing.

[4]  Preben Kidmose,et al.  Real-Life Dry-Contact Ear-EEG , 2018, 2018 40th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[5]  Kaare B. Mikkelsen,et al.  EEG Recorded from the Ear: Characterizing the Ear-EEG Method , 2015, Front. Neurosci..

[6]  Joong Hoon Lee,et al.  CNT/PDMS-based canal-typed ear electrodes for inconspicuous EEG recording. , 2014, Journal of neural engineering.

[7]  Preben Kidmose,et al.  In-Ear EEG From Viscoelastic Generic Earpieces: Robust and Unobtrusive 24/7 Monitoring , 2016, IEEE Sensors Journal.

[8]  B. Moreno,et al.  On the use of outer ear images for personal identification in security applications , 1999, Proceedings IEEE 33rd Annual 1999 International Carnahan Conference on Security Technology (Cat. No.99CH36303).

[9]  D. P. Mandic,et al.  The In-the-Ear Recording Concept: User-Centered and Wearable Brain Monitoring , 2012, IEEE Pulse.

[10]  Preben Kidmose,et al.  A Study of Evoked Potentials From Ear-EEG , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[11]  Preben Kidmose,et al.  Ear-EEG from generic earpieces: A feasibility study , 2013, 2013 35th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[12]  Farnoush Banaei Kashani,et al.  A Lightweight and Inexpensive In-ear Sensing System For Automatic Whole-night Sleep Stage Monitoring , 2016, SenSys.

[13]  Stefan Debener,et al.  Identifying auditory attention with ear-EEG: cEEGrid versus high-density cap-EEG comparison , 2016, Journal of neural engineering.

[14]  Preben Kidmose,et al.  Dry-Contact Electrode Ear-EEG , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.