The Impact of Internal and External Characteristics on the Adoption of Climate Mitigation Policies by US Municipalities

Many US municipalities are engaged in climate mitigation planning, or efforts to reduce their communities' greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions through land-use, transportation, and energy planning. However, they face a number of procedural and institutional obstacles that limit the adoption and implementation of those plans. The literature identifies some of the factors that lead municipalities to join relevant policy networks, but provides little guidance for overcoming the aforementioned obstacles and adopting policies to reduce community-wide GHG emissions. With this study I increase the understanding of climate mitigation planning by examining whether the adoption of these plans and policies is driven primarily by local demographic, economic, environmental, or political – institutional characteristics. My research is based upon a survey of 255 US municipalities. I combine the survey responses with secondary data and use multiple regression techniques to estimate the impact of fifteen demographic, political – institutional, economic, and environmental variables on the adoption of climate mitigation plans and policies. The influence of neighboring jurisdictions, the presence of staff members assigned to energy or climate planning, and the level of community environmental activism are found to have the greatest impact on climate mitigation policy adoption. These findings support the conclusion that the extent of climate mitigation planning is driven primarily by internal processes, and municipalities that are successful in this area do not fit any one profile according to their demographic, economic, or environmental characteristics.

[1]  R. Slocum.  Consumer Citizens and the Cities for Climate Protection Campaign , 2004 .

[2]  William D. Berry,et al.  State Lottery Adoptions as Policy Innovations: An Event History Analysis , 1990, American Political Science Review.

[3]  E. Hertwich,et al.  The case for consumption-based accounting of greenhouse gas emissions to promote local climate action , 2009 .

[4]  T. Panayotou,et al.  Demystifying the environmental Kuznets curve: turning a black box into a policy tool , 1997, Environment and Development Economics.

[5]  Frank Southworth,et al.  Mitigating Climate Change through Green Buildings and Smart Growth , 2008 .

[6]  Harriet Bulkeley,et al.  Discourse Coalitions and the Australian Climate Change Policy Network , 2000 .

[7]  Michele M. Betsill,et al.  Mitigating Climate Change in US Cities: Opportunities and obstacles , 2001 .

[8]  S. Brody,et al.  Vulnerability and Capacity: Explaining Local Commitment to Climate-Change Policy , 2008 .

[9]  F. Southworth,et al.  The Transportation Energy and Carbon Footprints of the 100 Largest U.S. Metropolitan Areas , 2008 .

[10]  P. Robinson,et al.  Barriers to Canadian Municipal Response to Climate Change , 2005 .

[11]  M. Betsill,et al.  Transnational Networks and Global Environmental Governance: The Cities for Climate Protection Program , 2004 .

[12]  Joyeeta Gupta,et al.  National efforts to enhance local climate policy in the Netherlands , 2007 .

[13]  G. Lindseth.  The Cities for Climate Protection Campaign (CCPC) and the framing of Local Climate Policy , 2004 .

[14]  Brent Yarnal,et al.  Universities and Climate Change Mitigation: Advancing Grassroots Climate Policy in the US , 2007 .

[15]  M. Betsill,et al.  Cities and climate change , 2002 .

[16]  C. Holgate.  Factors and Actors in Climate Change Mitigation: A Tale of Two South African Cities , 2007 .

[17]  Stephen H. Schneider,et al.  Global climate policy: will cities lead the way? , 2003 .

[18]  I. Vasi.  Organizational Environments, Framing Processes, and the Diffusion of the Program to Address Global Climate Change Among Local Governments in the United States , 2006 .

[19]  S. Brody,et al.  Risk, Stress, and Capacity , 2008 .

[20]  Michele M. Betsill,et al.  Cities and the Multilevel Governance of Global Climate Change , 2006, Understanding Global Cooperation.

[21]  J. Gupta.  The multi-level governance challenge of climate change , 2007 .

[22]  J. Randolph,et al.  Identifying Obstacles to Community Climate Protection Planning , 2009 .

[24]  I. Elander,et al.  Multilevel Governance, Networking Cities, and the Geography of Climate-Change Mitigation: Two Swedish Examples , 2009 .

[25]  J. Levit,et al.  The Scale of Networks? Local Climate Change Coalitions , 2007 .

[26]  D. Goodin,et al.  Changing places, changing emissions: The cross‐scale reliability of greenhouse gas emission inventories in the US , 1998 .

[27]  R. Ewing,et al.  Urban development and climate change , 2008 .

[28]  Henrik Selin.  Changing Climates in North American Politics : Institutions, Policymaking, and Multilevel Governance , 2009 .

[29]  M. Granberg,et al.  Local Governance and Climate Change: Reflections on the Swedish Experience , 2007 .

[30]  M. Betsill,et al.  Looking Back and Thinking Ahead: A Decade of Cities and Climate Change Research , 2007 .

[31]  Ute Collier,et al.  Local authorities and climate protection in the European union: Putting subsidiarity into practice? , 1997 .

[32]  Brian Stone,et al.  Is Compact Growth Good for Air Quality? , 2007 .

[33]  I. Rowlands,et al.  City Partners Maintain Climate Change Action Despite National Cuts: Residential Energy Efficiency Programme Valued at Local Level , 2007 .

[34]  D. Satterthwaite.  Cities' contribution to global warming: notes on the allocation of greenhouse gas emissions , 2008 .

[35]  Marilyn A. Brown,et al.  The Residential Energy and Carbon Footprints of the 100 Largest U.S. Metropolitan Areas , 2008 .

[36]  P. R. Lankao.  How do Local Governments in Mexico City Manage Global Warming , 2007 .

[37]  Sofie Storbjörk,et al.  Governing Climate Adaptation in the Local Arena: Challenges of Risk Management and Planning in Sweden , 2007 .