Prestimulus dynamics blend with the stimulus in neural variability quenching

Neural responses to the same stimulus show significant variability over trials, with this variability typically reduced (quenched) after a stimulus is presented. This trial-to-trial variability (TTV) has been much studied, however how this neural variability quenching is influenced by the ongoing dynamics of the prestimulus period is unknown. Utilizing a human intracranial stereo-electroencephalography (sEEG) data set, we investigate how prestimulus dynamics, as operationalized by standard deviation (SD), shapes poststimulus activity through trial-to-trial variability (TTV). We first observed greater poststimulus variability quenching in those real trials exhibiting high prestimulus variability as observed in all frequency bands. Next, we found that the relative effect of the stimulus was higher in the later (300-600ms) than the earlier (0-300ms) poststimulus period. Lastly, we replicate our findings in a separate EEG dataset and extend them by finding that trials with high prestimulus variability in the theta and alpha bands had faster reaction times. Together, our results demonstrate that stimulus-related activity, including its variability, is a blend of two factors: 1) the effects of the external stimulus itself, and 2) the effects of the ongoing dynamics spilling over from the prestimulus period - the state at stimulus onset - with the second dwarfing the influence of the first.

[1]  S. MacDonald,et al.  Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews Review Moment-to-moment Brain Signal Variability: a next Frontier in Human Brain Mapping? , 2022 .

[2]  Rui Dai,et al.  Is There a Nonadditive Interaction Between Spontaneous and Evoked Activity? Phase‐Dependence and Its Relation to the Temporal Structure of Scale‐Free Brain Activity , 2015, Cerebral cortex.

[3]  G. Northoff,et al.  Interindividual neural differences in moral decision-making are mediated by alpha power and delta/theta phase coherence , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[4]  Karl J. Friston.  The free-energy principle: a unified brain theory? , 2010, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[5]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Spontaneous network activity accounts for variability in stimulus-induced gamma responses , 2018, bioRxiv.

[6]  Lin Wang,et al.  Automatic and Precise Localization and Cortical Labeling of Subdural and Depth Intracranial Electrodes , 2017, Front. Neuroinform..

[7]  Amy L. Daitch,et al.  Spatial and temporal heterogeneity of neural responses in human posteromedial cortex , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  Tatiana Pasternak,et al.  Trial-to-trial variability of the prefrontal neurons reveals the nature of their engagement in a motion discrimination task , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  Gregor Thut,et al.  The role of brain oscillations in predicting self-generated sounds , 2017, NeuroImage.

[10]  Christopher W. Pleydell-Pearce,et al.  The phase of pre-stimulus alpha oscillations influences the visual perception of stimulus timing , 2016, NeuroImage.

[11]  W. Klimesch,et al.  Pre-stimulus alpha phase-alignment predicts P1-amplitude , 2011, Brain Research Bulletin.

[12]  Ilan Dinstein,et al.  The Magnitude of Trial-By-Trial Neural Variability Is Reproducible over Time and across Tasks in Humans , 2016, eNeuro.

[13]  Nicholas J. Priebe,et al.  The Emergence of Contrast-Invariant Orientation Tuning in Simple Cells of Cat Visual Cortex , 2007, Neuron.

[14]  Kenneth D. Harris,et al.  The impact of bilateral ongoing activity on evoked responses in mouse cortex , 2018 .

[15]  Gregor Thut,et al.  Prestimulus EEG Power Predicts Conscious Awareness But Not Objective Visual Performance , 2017, eNeuro.

[16]  Kathryn Bonnen,et al.  Beyond Trial-Based Paradigms: Continuous Behavior, Ongoing Neural Activity, and Natural Stimuli , 2018, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[17]  Biyu J. He.  Spontaneous and Task-Evoked Brain Activity Negatively Interact , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[18]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  Cortical activity is more stable when sensory stimuli are consciously perceived , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  Melina R. Uncapher,et al.  Memory failure predicted by attention lapsing and media multitasking , 2020, Nature.

[20]  Zheng Ji,et al.  Multiple characteristics analysis of Alzheimer’s electroencephalogram by power spectral density and Lempel–Ziv complexity , 2015, Cognitive Neurodynamics.

[21]  I. Dinstein,et al.  The Relationship between Trial-by-Trial Variability and Oscillations of Cortical Population Activity , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[22]  Michael X. Cohen,et al.  Individual Alpha Peak Frequency Predicts 10 Hz Flicker Effects on Selective Attention , 2017, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[23]  Andrew M. Clark,et al.  Stimulus onset quenches neural variability: a widespread cortical phenomenon , 2010, Nature Neuroscience.

[24]  Georg Northoff,et al.  Atypical Temporal Dynamics of Resting State Shapes Stimulus-Evoked Activity in Depression—An EEG Study on Rest–Stimulus Interaction , 2019, Front. Psychiatry.

[25]  Biyu J. He,et al.  Average Is Optimal: An Inverted-U Relationship between Trial-to-Trial Brain Activity and Behavioral Performance , 2013, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[26]  K. Harris,et al.  A Simple Model of Cortical Dynamics Explains Variability and State Dependence of Sensory Responses in Urethane-Anesthetized Auditory Cortex , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[27]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[28]  Guillaume Hennequin,et al.  The Dynamical Regime of Sensory Cortex: Stable Dynamics around a Single Stimulus-Tuned Attractor Account for Patterns of Noise Variability , 2018, Neuron.

[29]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[30]  M. Carandini,et al.  Cortical State Determines Global Variability and Correlations in Visual Cortex , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[31]  M. Sahani,et al.  State-Dependent Population Coding in Primary Auditory Cortex , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[32]  David J. Heeger,et al.  Neural variability: friend or foe? , 2015, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[33]  M. Tangermann,et al.  Automatic Classification of Artifactual ICA-Components for Artifact Removal in EEG Signals , 2011, Behavioral and Brain Functions.

[34]  Niels A. Kloosterman,et al.  Behavior needs neural variability , 2021, Neuron.

[35]  Brent Doiron,et al.  Circuit Models of Low-Dimensional Shared Variability in Cortical Networks , 2019, Neuron.

[36]  C. Koch,et al.  The origin of extracellular fields and currents — EEG, ECoG, LFP and spikes , 2012, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[37]  József Fiser,et al.  Suppression of cortical neural variability is stimulus- and state-dependent. , 2012, Journal of neurophysiology.

[38]  Tom Holroyd,et al.  A dual role of prestimulus spontaneous neural activity in visual object recognition , 2019, Nature Communications.

[39]  Gian Luca Romani,et al.  Intertrial Variability in the Premotor Cortex Accounts for Individual Differences in Peripersonal Space , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[40]  Opher Donchin,et al.  Individual Movement Variability Magnitudes Are Explained by Cortical Neural Variability , 2017, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[41]  Brian Maniscalco,et al.  Initial-state-dependent, robust, transient neural dynamics encode conscious visual perception , 2017, bioRxiv.

[42]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Reproducibility Distinguishes Conscious from Nonconscious Neural Representations , 2010, Science.

[43]  Stephen J. Anderson,et al.  Elsevier Editorial System(tm) for Brain Research Manuscript Draft Response Letter Reviewer Number 1 Attentional Changes in Pre-stimulus Oscillatory Activity within Early Visual Cortex Are Predictive of Human Visual Performance , 2007 .

[44]  Mahsa Shoaran,et al.  Neural variability quenching during decision-making: Neural individuality and its prestimulus complexity , 2019, NeuroImage.

[45]  Lyle J. Graham,et al.  Orientation and Direction Selectivity of Synaptic Inputs in Visual Cortical Neurons A Diversity of Combinations Produces Spike Tuning , 2003, Neuron.

[46]  Niall W. Duncan,et al.  Dissociation between anterior and posterior cortical regions during self‐specificity and familiarity: A combined fMRI–meta‐analytic study , 2012, Human brain mapping.

[47]  V. Lamme,et al.  No-Report Paradigms: Extracting the True Neural Correlates of Consciousness , 2015, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[48]  M. Carandini,et al.  The Nature of Shared Cortical Variability , 2015, Neuron.

[49]  A. Pouget,et al.  Variance as a Signature of Neural Computations during Decision Making , 2011, Neuron.

[50]  A. Grinvald,et al.  Dynamics of Ongoing Activity: Explanation of the Large Variability in Evoked Cortical Responses , 1996, Science.

[51]  Thomas Stieglitz,et al.  Context-specific modulation of intrinsic coupling modes shapes multisensory processing , 2019, Science Advances.

[52]  Rui Dai,et al.  Disrupted neural variability during propofol‐induced sedation and unconsciousness , 2018, Human brain mapping.

[53]  T. Womelsdorf,et al.  Neural overlap between resting state and self-relevant activity in human subcallosal cingulate cortex – Single unit recording in an intracranial study , 2014, Cortex.

[54]  G. La Camera,et al.  Stimuli Reduce the Dimensionality of Cortical Activity , 2015, bioRxiv.

[55]  Luca Berdondini,et al.  State-dependent representation of stimulus-evoked activity in high-density recordings of neural cultures , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[56]  Jorge A Gonzalez-Martinez,et al.  The Stereo-Electroencephalography: The Epileptogenic Zone , 2016, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[57]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Spontaneous fluctuations in posterior alpha-band EEG activity reflect variability in excitability of human visual areas. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[58]  K. Harris,et al.  Gating of Sensory Input by Spontaneous Cortical Activity , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[59]  Tirin Moore,et al.  Dissociation of Response Variability from Firing Rate Effects in Frontal Eye Field Neurons during Visual Stimulation, Working Memory, and Attention , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[60]  G. Northoff,et al.  Rest-stimulus interaction in the brain: a review , 2010, Trends in Neurosciences.

[61]  Birte U. Forstmann,et al.  Probing the neural signature of mind wandering with simultaneous fMRI-EEG and pupillometry , 2020, NeuroImage.

[62]  Biyu J. He,et al.  Electrophysiological correlates of the brain's intrinsic large-scale functional architecture , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[63]  G. Gerstein,et al.  Trial-to-Trial Variability and State-Dependent Modulation of Auditory-Evoked Responses in Cortex , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[64]  Nitzan Censor,et al.  Neural Variability Quenching Predicts Individual Perceptual Abilities , 2017, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[65]  Josef Parvizi,et al.  Promises and limitations of human intracranial electroencephalography , 2018, Nature Neuroscience.

[66]  S. Dalal,et al.  Prestimulus Oscillatory Phase at 7 Hz Gates Cortical Information Flow and Visual Perception , 2013, Current Biology.

[67]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Partitioning neuronal variability , 2014, Nature Neuroscience.

[68]  Jack J. Lin,et al.  Neural Mechanisms of Sustained Attention Are Rhythmic , 2018, Neuron.

[69]  Guglielmo Foffani,et al.  Trial-to-trial variability in the responses of neurons carries information about stimulus location in the rat whisker thalamus , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[70]  Stephanie Brandl,et al.  Robust artifactual independent component classification for BCI practitioners , 2014, Journal of neural engineering.

[71]  G. La Camera,et al.  Dynamics of Multistable States during Ongoing and Evoked Cortical Activity , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.