A Novel Image Quality Assessment Index for EdgeAware Noise Reduction in Low-Dose Fluoroscopy:Preliminary Results

X-ray fluoroscopy is a medical imaging modality that provides continuous real-time screening of patient’s organs and various radiopaque surgical objects. Fluoroscopy usually requires long and unpredictable exposure times, thus radiation intensity must be heavily reduced to limit patient’s dose. This gives rise to the well-known Poisson noise, which results in very poor image quality. Commercial fluoroscopes usually improve image quality via real-time temporal averaging, which produces motion blur in moving scenes. The Noise Variance Conditioned Average (NVCA) algorithm exploits the a priori knowledge of Poisson noise statistics to provide efficient noise reduction, while preserving the edges of moving objects. However, accurate setting of NVCA parameters is required to achieve the best results, and this could be supported by image quality assessment (IQA) indices. This study presents a novel, edge-aware IQA index, named Sensitivity of Edge Detection (SED), and compares it against the well-established Feature Similarity (FSIM) index, to assess their efficiency in determining the optimal parameters for NVCA. The preliminary results obtained in this study suggest SED could be more efficient than FSIM in identifying the best trade-off between noise reduction and edge preservation, and could be also used to determine the optimal parameters of other denoising algorithms.

[1]  Mostafa Kaveh,et al.  Anisotropic diffusion with monotonic edge-sharpening , 2010, Electronic Imaging.

[2]  P Bifulco,et al.  Advanced template matching method for estimation of intervertebral kinematics of lumbar spine. , 2011, Medical engineering & physics.

[3]  Luigi Paura,et al.  X-ray fluoroscopy noise modeling for filter design , 2013, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[4]  Maria Romano,et al.  A continuous description of intervertebral motion by means of spline interpolation of kinematic data extracted by videofluoroscopy. , 2012, Journal of biomechanics.

[5]  Paolo Bifulco,et al.  A Comparison of Denoising Algorithms for Effective Edge Detection in X-Ray Fluoroscopy , 2019 .

[6]  Paolo Bifulco,et al.  An FPGA-Oriented Algorithm for Real-Time Filtering of Poisson Noise in Video Streams, with Application to X-Ray Fluoroscopy , 2019, Circuits Syst. Signal Process..

[7]  Nilanjan Dey,et al.  Medical Imaging and Its Objective Quality Assessment: An Introduction , 2018 .

[8]  David L. Wilson,et al.  X-ray fluoroscopy spatio-temporal filtering with object detection , 1995, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[9]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[10]  Maria Romano,et al.  Hardware implementation of a spatio-temporal average filter for real-time denoising of fluoroscopic images , 2015, Integr..

[11]  Gabor Fichtinger,et al.  Seed localization in Ultrasound and Registration to C-Arm Fluoroscopy Using Matched Needle Tracks for Prostate Brachytherapy , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[12]  Qingguo Li,et al.  Poisson Noise Removal Scheme Based on Fourth-Order PDE by Alternating Minimization Algorithm , 2012 .

[13]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  The Essential Guide to Image Processing , 2009, J. Electronic Imaging.

[14]  David Zhang,et al.  FSIM: A Feature Similarity Index for Image Quality Assessment , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[15]  Lei Zhang,et al.  Non-Shift Edge Based Ratio (NSER): An Image Quality Assessment Metric Based on Early Vision Features , 2011, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[16]  John F. Canny,et al.  A Computational Approach to Edge Detection , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[17]  Yong Ding,et al.  Visual Quality Assessment for Natural and Medical Image , 2018 .

[18]  Hideki Yoshikawa,et al.  Improvement of depth position in 2-D/3-D registration of knee implants using single-plane fluoroscopy , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[19]  Asadollah Shahbahrami,et al.  EBIQA: An Edge Based Image Quality Assessment , 2011, 2011 7th Iranian Conference on Machine Vision and Image Processing.

[20]  Jian Yu,et al.  A Dictionary Learning Approach for Poisson Image Deblurring , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[21]  Raveendran Paramesran,et al.  Review of medical image quality assessment , 2016, Biomed. Signal Process. Control..

[22]  M. Tapiovaara SNR and noise measurements for medical imaging. II. Application to fluoroscopic X-ray equipment , 1993 .

[23]  P. Bifulco,et al.  Real-time algorithm for Poissonian noise reduction in low-dose fluoroscopy: performance evaluation , 2019, BioMedical Engineering OnLine.

[24]  Jürgen Weese,et al.  Voxel-based 2-D/3-D registration of fluoroscopy images and CT scans for image-guided surgery , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[25]  Lei Zhu,et al.  Noise reduction in low-dose x-ray fluoroscopy for image-guided radiation therapy. , 2009, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[26]  J Wang,et al.  The AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents: X-ray image intensifiers for fluoroscopy. , 2000, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[27]  Maria Romano,et al.  2D-3D Registration of CT Vertebra Volume to Fluoroscopy Projection: A Calibration Model Assessment , 2010, EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process..

[28]  Petros Maragos,et al.  Bayesian Inference on Multiscale Models for Poisson Intensity Estimation: Applications to Photon-Limited Image Denoising , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[29]  Paolo Bifulco,et al.  A comparison of denoising methods for X-ray fluoroscopic images , 2012, Biomed. Signal Process. Control..