Perceiving virtual geographical slant: action influences perception.

In 4 experiments, the authors varied the extent and nature of participant movement in a virtual environment to examine the influence of action on estimates of geographical slant. Previous studies showed that people consciously overestimate hill slant but can still accurately guide an action toward the hill (D. R. Proffitt, M. Bhalla, R. Gossweiler, & J. Midgett, 1995). Related studies suggest that one's potential to act may influence perception of slant and that distinct representations may independently inform perceptual and motoric responses. The authors found that in all conditions, perceptual judgments were overestimated and motoric adjustments were more accurate. The virtual environment allowed manipulation of the effort required to walk up simulated hills. Walking with the effort appropriate to the visual slant led to increased perceptual overestimation of slant compared with active walking with the effort appropriate to level ground, while visually guided actions remained accurate.

[1]  Melvyn A. Goodale,et al.  The Effect of Learned Perceptual Associations on Visuomotor Programming Varies with Kinematic Demands , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[2]  Rich Gossweiler,et al.  Perceiving geographical slant , 1995, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[3]  R. Ellis,et al.  The potentiation of grasp types during visual object categorization , 2001 .

[4]  M. A. Goodale,et al.  Grasping after a Delay Shifts Size-Scaling from Absolute to Relative Metrics , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[5]  M. Goodale,et al.  The visual brain in action , 1995 .

[6]  J. R. Simon,et al.  Reactions toward the source of stimulation. , 1969, Journal of experimental psychology.

[7]  S. Jackson,et al.  The Ponzo illusion affects grip-force but not grip-aperture scaling during prehension movements. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  Sarah H. Creem,et al.  Grasping objects by their handles: a necessary interaction between cognition and action. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  M. Goodale,et al.  Does a monocularly presented size-contrast illusion influence grip aperture? , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[10]  M. Fahle,et al.  Grasping Visual Illusions: No Evidence for a Dissociation Between Perception and Action , 2000, Psychological science.

[11]  F. Previc The neuropsychology of 3-D space. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.

[12]  Scott Glover,et al.  Visual illusions affect planning but not control , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[13]  M. Goodale,et al.  The effects of delay on the kinematics of grasping , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[14]  Alex Martin,et al.  Representation of Manipulable Man-Made Objects in the Dorsal Stream , 2000, NeuroImage.

[15]  Wendy D. Zosh,et al.  Seeing Mountains in Mole Hills: Geographical-Slant Perception , 2001, Psychological science.

[16]  S. Glover,et al.  Separate visual representations in the planning and control of action , 2004, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[17]  J A Perrone,et al.  Visual Slant Underestimation: A General Model , 1982, Perception.

[18]  J. Philbeck,et al.  Comparison of two indicators of perceived egocentric distance under full-cue and reduced-cue conditions. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[19]  Sarah H. Creem,et al.  Defining the cortical visual systems: "what", "where", and "how". , 2001, Acta psychologica.

[20]  S. Ellis Pictorial communication in virtual and real environments , 1991 .

[21]  V. Franz,et al.  Action does not resist visual illusions , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[22]  J. Gibson,et al.  The perceived slant of visual surfaces-optical and geographical. , 1952, Journal of experimental psychology.

[23]  David C. Burr,et al.  Separate visual representations for perception and action revealed by saccadic eye movements , 2001, Current Biology.

[24]  Melvyn A. Goodale,et al.  The Effect of Pictorial Illusion on Prehension and Perception , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[25]  L. S. Mark,et al.  The impact of visual exploration of judgments of whether a gap is crossable. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[26]  J. Haxby,et al.  Attribute-based neural substrates in temporal cortex for perceiving and knowing about objects , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[27]  M. Goodale,et al.  Size-contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand , 1995, Current Biology.

[28]  Bruce Bridgeman,et al.  A Spatially Oriented Decision Does Not Induce Consciousness in a Motor Task , 1998, Consciousness and Cognition.

[29]  R. Ellis,et al.  On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[30]  John A. Perrone,et al.  Visual slant underestimation , 1991 .

[31]  M. Fahle,et al.  P M Max−planck−institut Fü R Biologische Kybernetik the Eeects of Visual Illusions on Grasping , 1999 .

[32]  Dennis R. Proffitt,et al.  Two memories for geographical slant: Separation and interdependence of action and awareness , 1998, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[33]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Premotor Cortex Activation during Observation and Naming of Familiar Tools , 1997, NeuroImage.

[34]  D. Carey,et al.  Do action systems resist visual illusions? , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[35]  B. Bridgeman,et al.  Segregation of cognitive and motor aspects of visual function using induced motion , 1981, Perception & psychophysics.

[36]  John M. Hollerbach,et al.  Torso Force Feedback Realistically Simulates Slope on Treadmill-Style Locomotion Interfaces , 2001, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[37]  J. Decety,et al.  Does visual perception of object afford action? Evidence from a neuroimaging study , 2002, Neuropsychologia.

[38]  Anne E. Garing,et al.  Calibration of human locomotion and models of perceptual-motor organization. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[39]  John M. Hollerbach,et al.  Design Specifications for the Second Generation Sarcos Treadport Locomotion Interface , 2000, Dynamic Systems and Control: Volume 2.

[40]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Reorienting attention across the horizontal and vertical meridians: Evidence in favor of a premotor theory of attention , 1987, Neuropsychologia.

[41]  E. Reed The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1989 .

[42]  Peter Shirley,et al.  Geospecific Rendering of Alpine Terrain , 1999, Rendering Techniques.

[43]  W. Epstein The Relationship between Texture Gradient and Perceived Slant-in-Depth: Direct or Mediated? , 1981, Perception.

[44]  D. Proffitt,et al.  Visual-motor recalibration in geographical slant perception. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[45]  Jeanine K. Stefanucci,et al.  The Role of Effort in Perceiving Distance , 2003, Psychological science.

[46]  Melvyn A. Goodale,et al.  Learned perceptual associations influence visuomotor programming under limited conditions: kinematic consistency , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[47]  B. Bridgeman,et al.  Interaction of cognitive and sensorimotor maps of visual space , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[48]  Peter Dixon,et al.  Dynamic effects of the Ebbinghaus illusion in grasping: Support for a planning/control model of action , 2002, Perception & psychophysics.