How can LCA support the circular economy?—63rd discussion forum on life cycle assessment, Zurich, Switzerland, November 30, 2016

The concept of circular economy (CE) conceives of a production and consumption systemwith minimal losses of materials and energy through extensive reuse, recycling and recovery (Ellen MacArthur Foundation 2013; European Environment Agency 2014) and is gaining popularity in Europe and elsewhere. Both the recycling of waste and a recycling friendly eco-design are components of CE. In previous studies, however, life cycle assessment has shown that closed loops are not always favourable from an environmental point of view (Laner and Rechberger 2007; Humbert et al. 2009; Geyer et al. 2015). Nevertheless, political initiatives focus on the path towards CE without the use of life cycle assessment (LCA) to evaluate actions and targets. The Swiss LCA Discussion Forum is a platform for the exchange between industry, consulting companies and LCA scientists. The 63rd Swiss LCADiscussion Forum aimed at discussing the following leading questions with representatives from academia, institutional representatives and visionaries: (i) How can LCA support the creation of a circular economy? (ii) How shall substituted materials and products be accounted for, who can claim the benefit, and how is resource quality taken into consideration? (iii) How can wastes and resources be managed to minimise their environmental impacts? To set the stage at the discussion forum, the CE concepts and the political aspects were presented. The following presentations focused on factors relevant for consideration when evaluating the benefits of a CE, such as waste and resource quality aspects and their influence on the recycling system, as well as product quality. Based on these presentations, a panel discussion tackled the leading questions above. Finally, six case studies on CE were shown, highlighting key findings and methodological issues when LCA is used as a tool to assess CE.

[1]  Joel S. Hirschhorn Why the pollution prevention revolution failed—and why it ultimately will succeed , 1997 .

[2]  Stefanie Hellweg,et al.  Influence of Input‐Scrap Quality on the Environmental Impact of Secondary Steel Production , 2017 .

[3]  S. Hellweg,et al.  Do We Have the Right Performance Indicators for the Circular Economy?: Insight into the Swiss Waste Management System , 2017 .

[4]  Arnold Tukker,et al.  Environmental Impacts of Products: A Detailed Review of Studies , 2006 .

[5]  Brandon Kuczenski,et al.  Common Misconceptions about Recycling , 2016 .

[6]  Veronica Martinez-Sanchez,et al.  Life cycle costing of waste management systems: overview, calculation principles and case studies. , 2015, Waste management.

[7]  Manuele Margni,et al.  Life cycle assessment of two baby food packaging alternatives: glass jars vs. plastic pots , 2009 .

[8]  H. Rechberger,et al.  Treatment of cooling appliances: Interrelations between environmental protection, resource conservation, and recovery rates , 2007 .

[9]  Veronica Martinez-Sanchez,et al.  Life-Cycle Costing of Food Waste Management in Denmark: Importance of Indirect Effects. , 2016, Environmental science & technology.

[10]  David Laner,et al.  Material Cycles and Chemicals: Dynamic Material Flow Analysis of Contaminants in Paper Recycling. , 2016, Environmental science & technology.

[11]  Stig Irving Olsen,et al.  Circular economy: To be or not to be in a closed product loop? A Life Cycle Assessment of aluminium cans with inclusion of alloying elements , 2016 .