Constraints on local primordial non-Gaussianity from large scale structure

Recent work has shown that the local non-Gaussianity parameter fNL induces a scale dependent bias, whose amplitude is growing with scale. Here we first rederive this result within the context of the peak–background split formalism and show that it only depends on the assumption of universality of the mass function, assuming that the halo bias only depends on the mass. We then use the extended Press–Schechter formalism to argue that this assumption may be violated and that the scale dependent bias will depend on other properties, such as the merging history of halos. In particular, in the limit of recent mergers we find that the effect is suppressed. Next we use these predictions in conjunction with a compendium of large scale data to put a limit on the value of fNL. When combining all data assuming that the halo occupation depends only on the halo mass, we get a limit of -29 (-65)<fNL<+70 (+93) at 95% (99.7%) confidence. While we use a wide range of data sets, our combined result is dominated by the signal from the SDSS photometric quasar sample. If the latter are modeled as recent mergers then the limits weaken to -31 (-96)<fNL<+70 (+96). These limits are comparable to the strongest current limits from the Wilkinson Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) five-year analysis, with no evidence of a positive signal in fNL. While the method needs to be thoroughly tested against large scale structure simulations with realistic quasar and galaxy formation models, our results indicate that this is a competitive method relative to the cosmic microwave background one and should be further pursued both observationally and theoretically.

[1]  Kazuhiro Shimasaku,et al.  The ugriz Standard-Star System , 2002 .

[2]  M. Kamionkowski,et al.  Statistics of Sunyaev—Zel'dovich cluster surveys , 2001, astro-ph/0110299.

[3]  J. Vieira,et al.  An improved limit on the axion–photon coupling from the CAST experiment , 2007 .

[4]  Volker Bromm,et al.  The contribution of the first stars to the cosmic infrared background , 2001, astro-ph/0111467.

[5]  E. al.,et al.  The Sloan Digital Sky Survey: Technical summary , 2000, astro-ph/0006396.

[6]  Clustering of High Redshift (Z >= 2.9) Quasars from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey , 2007, astro-ph/0702214.

[7]  V. Narayanan,et al.  Spectroscopic Target Selection for the Sloan Digital Sky Survey: The Luminous Red Galaxy Sample , 2001, astro-ph/0108153.

[8]  F. M. Maley,et al.  An Efficient Targeting Strategy for Multiobject Spectrograph Surveys: the Sloan Digital Sky Survey “Tiling” Algorithm , 2001, astro-ph/0105535.

[9]  J. Gunn,et al.  A Photometricity and Extinction Monitor at the Apache Point Observatory , 2001, astro-ph/0106511.

[10]  A comparison of simulated and analytic major merger counts , 2000, astro-ph/0009381.

[11]  Walter A. Siegmund,et al.  The 2.5 m Telescope of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey , 2006, astro-ph/0602326.

[12]  R. Lupton,et al.  Astrometric Calibration of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey , 2002, astro-ph/0211375.

[13]  The Clustering of Massive Halos , 2006, astro-ph/0606699.

[14]  V. Narayanan,et al.  Spectroscopic Target Selection in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey: The Main Galaxy Sample , 2002, astro-ph/0206225.

[15]  S. Roweis,et al.  An Improved Photometric Calibration of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Imaging Data , 2007, astro-ph/0703454.

[16]  Self-consistent theory of halo mergers , 2004, astro-ph/0407136.

[17]  Y. Suto,et al.  The Dependence of Dark Halo Clustering on Formation Epoch and Concentration Parameter , 2006, astro-ph/0610099.

[18]  M. Skrutskie,et al.  2MASS Extended Source Catalog: Overview and Algorithms , 2000, astro-ph/0004318.

[19]  E. Greisen,et al.  The NRAO VLA Sky Survey , 1996 .

[20]  Baryogenesis from gravitational decay of TeV particles in theories with low scale gravity , 2006, hep-ph/0612018.

[21]  J. Maldacena Non-Gaussian features of primordial fluctuations in single field inflationary models , 2002, astro-ph/0210603.

[22]  New generalized Chaplygin gas as a scheme for unification of dark energy and dark matter , 2004, astro-ph/0411221.

[23]  Alfio Bonanno,et al.  Entropy signature of the running cosmological constant , 2007, 0706.0174.

[24]  et al,et al.  The Sloan Digital Sky Survey Photometric Camera , 1998, astro-ph/9809085.

[25]  J. R. Bond,et al.  Radical Compression of Cosmic Microwave Background Data , 2000 .

[26]  R. Becker,et al.  Evidence for Quasar Activity Triggered by Galaxy Mergers in HST Observations of Dust-reddened Quasars , 2007, 0709.2805.

[27]  J. R. Bond,et al.  Extended Mosaic Observations with the Cosmic Background Imager , 2004 .

[28]  M. SubbaRao,et al.  Spectroscopic Target Selection in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey: The Quasar Sample , 2002, astro-ph/0202251.

[29]  L. Verde,et al.  The Abundance of High-Redshift Objects as a Probe of Non-Gaussian Initial Conditions , 2000, astro-ph/0001366.

[30]  U. Chicago,et al.  The Astrophysical Journal, in press Preprint typeset using L ATEX style emulateapj v. 6/22/04 THE DEPENDENCE OF HALO CLUSTERING ON HALO FORMATION HISTORY, CONCENTRATION, AND OCCUPATION , 2005 .

[31]  C. L. Kuo,et al.  Improved measurements of the CMB power spectrum with ACBAR , 2007 .

[32]  Alexander S. Szalay,et al.  The Shape of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Data Release 5 Galaxy Power Spectrum , 2007 .