Challenges in measuring and understanding biological noise

Biochemical reactions are intrinsically stochastic, leading to variation in the production of mRNAs and proteins within cells. In the scientific literature, this source of variation is typically referred to as ‘noise’. The observed variability in molecular phenotypes arises from a combination of processes that amplify and attenuate noise. Our ability to quantify cell-to-cell variability in numerous biological contexts has been revolutionized by recent advances in single-cell technology, from imaging approaches through to ‘omics’ strategies. However, defining, accurately measuring and disentangling the stochastic and deterministic components of cell-to-cell variability is challenging. In this Review, we discuss the sources, impact and function of molecular phenotypic variability and highlight future directions to understand its role.Gene expression is subjected to various random processes (referred to as ‘noise’) that contribute to variability in molecular phenotypes. As Eling, Morgan and Marioni describe, there are various challenges to studying this variability, such as disentangling its multilayered sources, distinguishing it from deterministic influences on cellular variability, modelling it with appropriate statistical methods and understanding its practical consequences.

[1]  Michael J. Ziller,et al.  Locally disordered methylation forms the basis of intratumor methylome variation in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. , 2014, Cancer cell.

[2]  Carsten Marr,et al.  Early myeloid lineage choice is not initiated by random PU.1 to GATA1 protein ratios , 2016, Nature.

[3]  Adam P Arkin,et al.  Orthogonal control of expression mean and variance by epigenetic features at different genomic loci , 2015, Molecular systems biology.

[4]  Peter G. Wolynes,et al.  Deciding fate in adverse times: Sporulation and competence in Bacillus subtilis , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  P. Swain,et al.  Stochastic Gene Expression in a Single Cell , 2002, Science.

[6]  J. Marioni,et al.  Heterogeneity in Oct4 and Sox2 Targets Biases Cell Fate in 4-Cell Mouse Embryos , 2016, Cell.

[7]  R. Medema,et al.  Assessing kinetics from fixed cells reveals activation of the mitotic entry network at the S/G2 transition. , 2014, Molecular cell.

[8]  Richard A. Muscat,et al.  Single-cell profiling of the developing mouse brain and spinal cord with split-pool barcoding , 2018, Science.

[9]  Aleksandra A. Kolodziejczyk,et al.  The technology and biology of single-cell RNA sequencing. , 2015, Molecular cell.

[10]  G. Sanguinetti,et al.  scNMT-seq enables joint profiling of chromatin accessibility DNA methylation and transcription in single cells , 2018, Nature Communications.

[11]  Jean Sippy,et al.  Decision Making at a Subcellular Level Determines the Outcome of Bacteriophage Infection , 2010, Cell.

[12]  Rudiyanto Gunawan,et al.  Single-Cell-Based Analysis Highlights a Surge in Cell-to-Cell Molecular Variability Preceding Irreversible Commitment in a Differentiation Process , 2016, PLoS biology.

[13]  Alexander van Oudenaarden,et al.  Variability in gene expression underlies incomplete penetrance , 2009, Nature.

[14]  Lucas Pelkmans,et al.  Multiplexed protein maps link subcellular organization to cellular states , 2018, Science.

[15]  Hannah H. Chang,et al.  Transcriptome-wide noise controls lineage choice in mammalian progenitor cells , 2008, Nature.

[16]  Alexander van Oudenaarden,et al.  Stochastic Cytokine Expression Induces Mixed T Helper Cell States , 2013, PLoS biology.

[17]  Michelle Girvan,et al.  Single-cell systems biology: probing the basic unit of information flow. , 2018, Current opinion in systems biology.

[18]  P. Nurse,et al.  A Coordinated Global Control over Cellular Transcription , 2010, Current Biology.

[19]  P. Wittkopp,et al.  Selection on noise constrains variation in a eukaryotic promoter , 2015, Nature.

[20]  S. Kauffman,et al.  Cancer attractors: a systems view of tumors from a gene network dynamics and developmental perspective. , 2009, Seminars in cell & developmental biology.

[21]  Prakash Kulkarni,et al.  Phenotypic Plasticity and Cell Fate Decisions in Cancer: Insights from Dynamical Systems Theory , 2017, Cancers.

[22]  J. Raser,et al.  Noise in Gene Expression: Origins, Consequences, and Control , 2005, Science.

[23]  John R. Haliburton,et al.  Abseq: Ultrahigh-throughput single cell protein profiling with droplet microfluidic barcoding , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[24]  J. Bähler,et al.  Tuning gene expression to changing environments: from rapid responses to evolutionary adaptation , 2008, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[25]  Jung Kyoon Choi,et al.  Epigenetic regulation and the variability of gene expression , 2008, Nature Genetics.

[26]  Evan Z. Macosko,et al.  Highly Parallel Genome-wide Expression Profiling of Individual Cells Using Nanoliter Droplets , 2015, Cell.

[27]  Simon X. Chen,et al.  Emergence of reproducible spatiotemporal activity during motor learning , 2014, Nature.

[28]  Leor S Weinberger,et al.  Cytoplasmic Amplification of Transcriptional Noise Generates Substantial Cell-to-Cell Variability. , 2018, Cell systems.

[29]  Andrew C. Adey,et al.  Comprehensive single cell transcriptional profiling of a multicellular organism by combinatorial indexing , 2017 .

[30]  C. Pesce,et al.  Regulated cell-to-cell variation in a cell-fate decision system , 2005, Nature.

[31]  Ryan A. Kellogg,et al.  Digital signaling decouples activation probability and population heterogeneity , 2015, eLife.

[32]  Wolfgang Huber,et al.  Cell-to-cell expression variability followed by signal reinforcement progressively segregates early mouse lineages , 2013, Nature Cell Biology.

[33]  J. Marioni,et al.  Inferring the kinetics of stochastic gene expression from single-cell RNA-sequencing data , 2013, Genome Biology.

[34]  Drew Endy,et al.  Determination of cell fate selection during phage lambda infection , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[35]  Daniel S. Day,et al.  Comprehensive analysis of promoter-proximal RNA polymerase II pausing across mammalian cell types , 2016, Genome Biology.

[36]  A. Oudenaarden,et al.  Feedback Control of Gene Expression Variability in the Caenorhabditis elegans Wnt Pathway , 2013, Cell.

[37]  C. J. Zopf,et al.  Cell-Cycle Dependence of Transcription Dominates Noise in Gene Expression , 2013, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[38]  Roman Schefzik,et al.  Onset of differentiation is posttranscriptionally controlled in adult neural stem cells , 2018, bioRxiv.

[39]  Alfonso Martinez Arias,et al.  Filtering transcriptional noise during development: concepts and mechanisms , 2006, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[40]  M. Kirschner,et al.  Dynamics extracted from fixed cells reveal feedback linking cell growth to cell cycle , 2013, Nature.

[41]  Keji Zhao,et al.  Intrinsic Dynamics of a Human Gene Reveal the Basis of Expression Heterogeneity , 2019, Cell.

[42]  J. R. Chubb,et al.  Promoter-mediated diversification of transcriptional bursting dynamics following gene duplication , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[43]  D. Latchman Transcription factors: an overview. , 1997, The international journal of biochemistry & cell biology.

[44]  S. Richardson,et al.  Correcting the Mean-Variance Dependency for Differential Variability Testing Using Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Data , 2018, Cell systems.

[45]  Aleksandra A. Kolodziejczyk,et al.  Accounting for technical noise in single-cell RNA-seq experiments , 2013, Nature Methods.

[46]  Gioele La Manno,et al.  Quantitative single-cell RNA-seq with unique molecular identifiers , 2013, Nature Methods.

[47]  Kevin A. Pelphrey,et al.  Genome-Wide Detection of Single-Nucleotide and Copy-Number Variations of a Single Human Cell , 2012 .

[48]  A. Raj,et al.  Single mammalian cells compensate for differences in cellular volume and DNA copy number through independent global transcriptional mechanisms. , 2015, Molecular cell.

[49]  Fabian J Theis,et al.  An atlas of the aging lung mapped by single cell transcriptomics and deep tissue proteomics , 2018, Nature Communications.

[50]  Joseph L. Herman,et al.  Characterizing transcriptional heterogeneity through pathway and gene set overdispersion analysis , 2015, Nature Methods.

[51]  P. Sorger,et al.  Non-genetic origins of cell-to-cell variability in TRAIL-induced apoptosis , 2009, Nature.

[52]  Andre J. Faure,et al.  Systematic Analysis of the Determinants of Gene Expression Noise in Embryonic Stem Cells. , 2017, Cell systems.

[53]  H. Swerdlow,et al.  Large-scale simultaneous measurement of epitopes and transcriptomes in single cells , 2017, Nature Methods.

[54]  Jürg Bähler,et al.  Tuning gene expression to changing environments: from rapid responses to evolutionary adaptation , 2009, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[55]  N. Barkai,et al.  A genetic signature of interspecies variations in gene expression , 2006, Nature Genetics.

[56]  Manuel Serrano,et al.  The Hallmarks of Aging , 2013, Cell.

[57]  Michael L. Simpson,et al.  A Post-Transcriptional Feedback Mechanism for Noise Suppression and Fate Stabilization , 2018, Cell.

[58]  Sui Huang Non-genetic heterogeneity of cells in development: more than just noise , 2009, Development.

[59]  M. Elowitz,et al.  Functional roles for noise in genetic circuits , 2010, Nature.

[60]  Marc Hafner,et al.  Fractional killing arises from cell-to-cell variability in overcoming a caspase activity threshold , 2015, Molecular Systems Biology.

[61]  J. Raser,et al.  Control of Stochasticity in Eukaryotic Gene Expression , 2004, Science.

[62]  Ertugrul M. Ozbudak,et al.  Regulation of noise in the expression of a single gene , 2002, Nature Genetics.

[63]  Nathan C. Sheffield,et al.  Multi-Omics of Single Cells: Strategies and Applications , 2016, Trends in biotechnology.

[64]  Alistair N Boettiger,et al.  Synchronous and Stochastic Patterns of Gene Activation in the Drosophila Embryo , 2009, Science.

[65]  A. Arkin,et al.  Stochastic kinetic analysis of developmental pathway bifurcation in phage lambda-infected Escherichia coli cells. , 1998, Genetics.

[66]  Scott A. Rifkin,et al.  Genetic Properties Influencing the Evolvability of Gene Expression , 2007, Science.

[67]  J. Workman,et al.  Signals and combinatorial functions of histone modifications. , 2011, Annual review of biochemistry.

[68]  Hana El-Samad,et al.  Cellular noise regulons underlie fluctuations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2012, Molecular cell.

[69]  Debora S. Marks,et al.  MicroRNA control of protein expression noise , 2015, Science.

[70]  Fabian J Theis,et al.  Computational analysis of cell-to-cell heterogeneity in single-cell RNA-sequencing data reveals hidden subpopulations of cells , 2015, Nature Biotechnology.

[71]  Francesco Vallania,et al.  Single-Cell Chromatin Modification Profiling Reveals Increased Epigenetic Variations with Aging , 2018, Cell.

[72]  Sydney M. Shaffer,et al.  Rare cell variability and drug-induced reprogramming as a mode of cancer drug resistance , 2017, Nature.

[73]  E. Cox,et al.  Real-Time Kinetics of Gene Activity in Individual Bacteria , 2005, Cell.

[74]  Andrew C. Adey,et al.  Single-Cell Transcriptional Profiling of a Multicellular Organism , 2017 .

[75]  L. Pelkmans,et al.  Control of Transcript Variability in Single Mammalian Cells , 2015, Cell.

[76]  E. O’Shea,et al.  Noise in protein expression scales with natural protein abundance , 2006, Nature Genetics.

[77]  Eli R. Zunder,et al.  Highly multiplexed simultaneous detection of RNAs and proteins in single cells , 2016, Nature Methods.

[78]  K. Polyak,et al.  Intra-tumour heterogeneity: a looking glass for cancer? , 2012, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[79]  Ben Lehner Selection to minimise noise in living systems and its implications for the evolution of gene expression , 2008, Molecular systems biology.

[80]  Aleksandra A. Kolodziejczyk,et al.  Single Cell RNA-Sequencing of Pluripotent States Unlocks Modular Transcriptional Variation , 2015, Cell stem cell.

[81]  J. Widom,et al.  Single-cell nucleosome mapping reveals the molecular basis of gene expression heterogeneity , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[82]  R. Sandberg,et al.  Genomic encoding of transcriptional burst kinetics , 2019, Nature.

[83]  P. Wittkopp,et al.  Fitness effects of altering gene expression noise in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2018, bioRxiv.

[84]  Allon M. Klein,et al.  Droplet Barcoding for Single-Cell Transcriptomics Applied to Embryonic Stem Cells , 2015, Cell.

[85]  Dan S. Tawfik,et al.  Noise–mean relationship in mutated promoters , 2012, Genome research.

[86]  R. Singer,et al.  Transcriptional Pulsing of a Developmental Gene , 2006, Current Biology.

[87]  Gürol M. Süel,et al.  An excitable gene regulatory circuit induces transient cellular differentiation , 2006, Nature.

[88]  Bertrand Z. Yeung,et al.  Cell Hashing with barcoded antibodies enables multiplexing and doublet detection for single cell genomics , 2018, Genome Biology.

[89]  Nir Friedman,et al.  Mapping Differentiation under Mixed Culture Conditions Reveals a Tunable Continuum of T Cell Fates , 2013, PLoS biology.

[90]  Mads Kærn,et al.  Noise in eukaryotic gene expression , 2003, Nature.

[91]  Sean C. Bendall,et al.  Single-Cell Mass Cytometry of Differential Immune and Drug Responses Across a Human Hematopoietic Continuum , 2011, Science.

[92]  M. Ko,et al.  A stochastic model for gene induction. , 1991, Journal of theoretical biology.

[93]  Ben Lehner,et al.  Empirical noise-mean fitness landscapes and the evolution of gene expression , 2018, bioRxiv.

[94]  J. Marioni,et al.  Single-Cell Landscape of Transcriptional Heterogeneity and Cell Fate Decisions during Mouse Early Gastrulation , 2017, Cell reports.

[95]  D. Tranchina,et al.  Stochastic mRNA Synthesis in Mammalian Cells , 2006, PLoS biology.

[96]  M. Lieb THE ESTABLISHMENT OF LYSOGENICITY IN ESCHERICHIA COLI , 1953, Journal of bacteriology.

[97]  Eran Segal,et al.  Probing the effect of promoters on noise in gene expression using thousands of designed sequences , 2014, Genome research.

[98]  J. Peccoud,et al.  Markovian Modeling of Gene-Product Synthesis , 1995 .

[99]  A. Oudenaarden,et al.  Cellular Decision Making and Biological Noise: From Microbes to Mammals , 2011, Cell.

[100]  P. Swain,et al.  Intrinsic and extrinsic contributions to stochasticity in gene expression , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[101]  J. Derisi,et al.  Single-cell proteomic analysis of S. cerevisiae reveals the architecture of biological noise , 2006, Nature.

[102]  X. Xie,et al.  Genome-Wide Detection of Single-Nucleotide and Copy-Number Variations of a Single Human Cell , 2012, Science.

[103]  A. Oudenaarden,et al.  Nature, Nurture, or Chance: Stochastic Gene Expression and Its Consequences , 2008, Cell.

[104]  Ido Golding,et al.  Genetic Determinants and Cellular Constraints in Noisy Gene Expression , 2013, Science.

[105]  Paul A. Wiggins,et al.  Noise in a phosphorelay drives stochastic entry into sporulation in Bacillus subtilis , 2017, The EMBO journal.

[106]  J. Buhmann,et al.  Highly multiplexed imaging of tumor tissues with subcellular resolution by mass cytometry , 2014, Nature Methods.

[107]  L. Cai,et al.  In Situ Transcription Profiling of Single Cells Reveals Spatial Organization of Cells in the Mouse Hippocampus , 2016, Neuron.

[108]  Jane Kondev,et al.  Regulation of noise in gene expression. , 2013, Annual review of biophysics.

[109]  Michael Levine,et al.  Enhancer Control of Transcriptional Bursting , 2016, Cell.

[110]  D. J. Kiviet,et al.  Stochasticity of metabolism and growth at the single-cell level , 2014, Nature.

[111]  X. Zhuang,et al.  Spatially resolved, highly multiplexed RNA profiling in single cells , 2015, Science.

[112]  Michael Lässig,et al.  Gene expression variability across cells and species shapes innate immunity , 2018, Nature.

[113]  François Nédélec,et al.  Asymmetric division of contractile domains couples cell positioning and fate specification , 2016, Nature.

[114]  A. Oudenaarden,et al.  Validation of noise models for single-cell transcriptomics , 2014, Nature Methods.

[115]  Andrew C. Adey,et al.  Multiplex single-cell profiling of chromatin accessibility by combinatorial cellular indexing , 2015, Science.

[116]  J. P. McCoy,et al.  Systematic Analysis of Cell-to-Cell Expression Variation of T Lymphocytes in a Human Cohort Identifies Aging and Genetic Associations. , 2016, Immunity.

[117]  C. Ponting,et al.  G&T-seq: parallel sequencing of single-cell genomes and transcriptomes , 2015, Nature Methods.

[118]  Andrew C. Adey,et al.  Sequencing thousands of single-cell genomes with combinatorial indexing , 2017, Nature Methods.

[119]  S. Quake,et al.  Single-Cell Analysis of Human Pancreas Reveals Transcriptional Signatures of Aging and Somatic Mutation Patterns , 2017, Cell.

[120]  Rob Phillips,et al.  Promoter architecture dictates cell-to-cell variability in gene expression , 2014, Science.

[121]  J. Marioni,et al.  CpG island composition differences are a source of gene expression noise indicative of promoter responsiveness , 2018, Genome Biology.

[122]  Koichi Takahashi,et al.  Modeling Cellular Noise Underlying Heterogeneous Cell Responses in the Epidermal Growth Factor Signaling Pathway , 2016, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[123]  M. Esteller,et al.  Epigenetic modifications and human disease , 2010, Nature Biotechnology.

[124]  Robert Langer,et al.  CRISPR-Cas9 Knockin Mice for Genome Editing and Cancer Modeling , 2014, Cell.

[125]  Uniform gene expression in embryos is achieved by temporal averaging of transcription noise. , 2017, Genes & development.

[126]  J. R. Chubb,et al.  Generation of Single-Cell Transcript Variability by Repression , 2017, Current Biology.

[127]  C. Ponting,et al.  Single-Cell Multiomics: Multiple Measurements from Single Cells , 2017, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[128]  Andrew C. Adey,et al.  Highly scalable generation of DNA methylation profiles in single cells , 2018, Nature Biotechnology.

[129]  W. Reik,et al.  Single-cell epigenomics: powerful new methods for understanding gene regulation and cell identity , 2016, Genome Biology.

[130]  T. Hiiragi,et al.  Symmetry Breaking in the Mammalian Embryo. , 2018, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[131]  Roman Schefzik,et al.  Onset of differentiation is post-transcriptionally controlled in adult neural stem cells , 2019, Nature.

[132]  Alex K. Shalek,et al.  Heterogeneity in immune responses: from populations to single cells. , 2014, Trends in immunology.

[133]  Takashi Hiiragi,et al.  Stochastic patterning in the mouse pre-implantation embryo , 2007, Development.

[134]  C. Ponting,et al.  Parallel single-cell sequencing links transcriptional and epigenetic heterogeneity , 2015, Nature Methods.

[135]  Hannah H. Chang,et al.  Cell Fate Decision as High-Dimensional Critical State Transition , 2016, bioRxiv.

[136]  M. Hemberg,et al.  Challenges in unsupervised clustering of single-cell RNA-seq data , 2019, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[137]  Aleksandra A. Kolodziejczyk,et al.  Flipping between Polycomb repressed and active transcriptional states introduces noise in gene expression , 2017, bioRxiv.

[138]  A. Graham,et al.  Instructed subsets or agile swarms: how T-helper cells may adaptively counter uncertainty with variability and plasticity. , 2017, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[139]  N. Barkai,et al.  Two strategies for gene regulation by promoter nucleosomes. , 2008, Genome research.

[140]  D. Volfson,et al.  Origins of extrinsic variability in eukaryotic gene expression , 2006, Nature.

[141]  Siddharth S. Dey,et al.  Integrated genome and transcriptome sequencing from the same cell , 2014, Nature Biotechnology.

[142]  A. Oudenaarden,et al.  Single-molecule mRNA detection and counting in mammalian tissue , 2013, Nature Protocols.

[143]  Deborah A. Flusberg,et al.  Surviving apoptosis: life-death signaling in single cells. , 2015, Trends in cell biology.

[144]  A. Valencia,et al.  Epigenetic and Transcriptional Variability Shape Phenotypic Plasticity , 2018, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[145]  A. Daar,et al.  South Africa: from species cradle to genomic applications , 2008, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[146]  G. Lahav,et al.  Cell-to-Cell Variation in p53 Dynamics Leads to Fractional Killing , 2016, Cell.

[147]  Rona S. Gertner,et al.  Single cell RNA Seq reveals dynamic paracrine control of cellular variation , 2014, Nature.

[148]  A. Raj,et al.  Transcriptional Burst Initiation and Polymerase Pause Release Are Key Control Points of Transcriptional Regulation. , 2019, Molecular cell.

[149]  David A. Weitz,et al.  Scaling by shrinking: empowering single-cell 'omics' with microfluidic devices , 2017, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[150]  Daniel R. Larson,et al.  A single molecule view of gene expression. , 2009, Trends in cell biology.

[151]  Catalina A. Vallejos,et al.  BASiCS: Bayesian Analysis of Single-Cell Sequencing Data , 2015, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[152]  Sarah A. Teichmann,et al.  Aging increases cell-to-cell transcriptional variability upon immune stimulation , 2017, Science.

[153]  D. Larson,et al.  Single-RNA counting reveals alternative modes of gene expression in yeast , 2008, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[154]  S. Itzkovitz,et al.  Nuclear Retention of mRNA in Mammalian Tissues , 2015, Cell reports.

[155]  F. Bruggeman,et al.  The volumes and transcript counts of single cells reveal concentration homeostasis and capture biological noise , 2015, Molecular biology of the cell.

[156]  Hanspeter Herzel,et al.  Adequate immune response ensured by binary IL-2 and graded CD25 expression in a murine transfer model , 2016, eLife.